Quantcast
Channel: Pension Pulse
Viewing all 2816 articles
Browse latest View live

Canada's Pensions Staying The Course?

$
0
0
Mark Machin, President & CEO of CPP Investments, updated Canadians telling them to take comfort, the CPP Fund is built for the long haul:
As the head of CPP Investments, the organization that invests the Canada Pension Plan Fund in the best interests of millions of Canadians, I spend a lot of my time thinking about long-term risks that could affect the safety of our investments, risk in relation to opportunity, and the potential risks we can’t foresee that spring up suddenly.

The COVID-19 pandemic currently roiling markets worldwide falls squarely in that last category. While the possibility for widespread contagion is ever present, a few short months ago it was still a theoretical risk. No longer.

This coronavirus presents a serious challenge to communities and people everywhere and is forcing profound changes in our daily lives.

At CPP Investments, we’re taking all precautions to prevent community spread and are encouraging others to do the same. We’ve stopped all non-essential travel, enabled our employees to work from home, and are doing our part to maintain essential services to Canadians.

For us, that means continuing to help protect the Canada Pension Plan, which is the base layer of retirement savings for most Canadians. Canadians are focused, as they should be, on keeping their families healthy. We remain focused on safeguarding the financial health of the CPP Fund. I can assure you that, even in the aftermath of the stock market declines in recent days, the sustainability of your CPP Fund remains secure.

In the coming months, many businesses, will experience levels of stress they have not seen in years – or in fact, may have never seen. We take a long-term view. We have weathered crises before, and we know that heightened stress makes it ever more important to keep our focus on the long term.

Our job is to deliver strong financial performance for multiple generations. That’s why we evaluate every investment we make on its ability to generate returns for decades, not on the likelihood of an up or down price movement in the next quarter.

Of course, we will continue to stress test our portfolio, looking at investment outcomes under a variety of extreme scenarios so we can be confident that, whatever happens over the coming weeks and months, the necessary funds will always be available for CPP benefits payments.

With this long-term view, we pursue an active, long-term investing strategy. Starting most crucially with diversification, both in where and how we invest. We invest across sectors, strategies and markets that span the globe. This diversification ensures our access to the best opportunities, reduces risk from overexposure to any one market or asset class, and lets us buy and hold when others can be distracted by short-term volatility.

Another critical strength is our size, soundness and governance structure, which allows us to navigate market volatility unlike many other investors. We’ve weathered through trouble before, not allowing short-term drops to distract us from focusing on long-term gains. During the Global Financial Crisis, the CPP Fund lost 18.8% in value in one year, but just six years later the CPP Fund’s investments gained 18.3% in one year alone. What matters is our performance over a much longer horizon. Our 10-year performance, reported in December, was well over 10%.


Over the past 21 years, we’ve grown the CPP Fund from $36.9 billion to $420.4 billion; and the most recent report by the Chief Actuary of Canada, released in December 2019, states the Fund continues to be sustainable for more than 75 years. This performance was made possible by the diverse skills, deep expertise, and network of relationships we’ve built over the years.

We don’t yet know the full impact of COVID-19. It will continue to affect the global economy and like other global investors, we will not be immune. We believe strongly, however, that our long-term investing view, our deep bench of talent and expertise, and our highly-diversified portfolio will continue to serve the Canadians who depend on us for the safety of their retirements. To all 20 million Canadians who participate in the CPP – it is with kindness to one another and confidence in the systems in place, like the CPP, that we will endure.
Dr. Mark Machin tells it like it is and he's spot on, the CPP Fund isn't immune to the downturn -- no pension is -- but it has the right governance and long-term view to invest across public and private markets all over the world, and it will weather this storm as it has weathered previous ones.

I'm not too worried about Canada's large pensions, not only to they have the right governance, long-term focus and skill set to weather this crisis, they also have great balance sheets and can leverage up their portfolios to take advantage of dislocations in the markets.

Yesterday, I had a chat with HOOPP's soon-to-be retired CEO Jim Keohane on that organization's stellar 2019 results. Jim told me they got hit this quarter but their surplus allows them to absorb these losses and they remain full funded.

He also told me they are holding daily management meetings to discuss dislocations in markets and where to take risks to obtain the best risk-adjusted returns.

I guarantee you the same thing is happening at all of Canada's large pensions which are all liquidity providers.

Yaelle Gang of the Canadian Investment Review reports on how OPTrust's CIO, James Davis is keeping calm and sticking to the plan:
Although the markets are changing quickly due to the impacts of coronavirus, the OPSEU Pension Trust is a long-term investor and its overall investment strategy hasn’t changed, says James Davis, the fund’s chief investment officer.

The plan’s portfolio was constructed to be resilient and withstand events similar to what’s happening in today’s markets, he says, noting the portfolio is broken down into three sections: risk mitigation, return seeking and liability hedging.

“The liability-hedge portfolio, which is comprised mostly of bonds is doing very well,” says Davis. “The risk-mitigation portfolio is doing even better because there we’ve got exposure not only to bonds but to [trend strategies] and also to defensive currencies and we have some gold in that portfolio as well . . .The return-seeking portfolio, on the other hand, of course, has more exposure to risk. You need to take that exposure to risk in order to earn the returns to pay pensions. And that is the part of the portfolio that is experiencing drawdown at the moment.”

That said, since the OPTrust is a relatively mature pension plan, its portfolio has been designed with the objective of earning the return required to pay pensions at the lowest risk possible, so its risk exposure is low.

However, while the plan is in a good position, some worrisome things are playing out in the market, he adds, noting correlations that are a reflection of illiquidity.

“The markets, at this point in time, are experiencing something not dissimilar to 2008, and central bankers are doing what they can to unclog the plumbing. But I think that, coupled with a lot of quantitative strategies that are essentially position-sized on the basis of volatility, as volatility has risen, they’ve had to unwind some of those positions and that has added to the illiquidity in the market because there’s simply not enough buyers and too many sellers.”

The OPTrust, in particular, is quite flush with liquidity because it set its investment strategy up with this in mind. “Now, with markets in the state that they’re in, opportunities are presenting themselves on a daily basis and we have the ability to provide liquidity to the markets and take advantage of some of those opportunities.”

But Davis does acknowledge that the plan isn’t a market-timer, adding he doesn’t know when the bottom will be hit. “We’ve looked at bear markets since 1900 and what we’ve seen now is not as bad as it can be and it’s certainly too short to call an end to it. So we have to be mindful that this can get worse before it gets better.”

At times like this, it’s important for plan sponsors to stay focused on the amount of risk they’re taking and avoid excessive risk, says Davis, though with interest rates falling over the last several years, central banks have been pushing investors out on the risk curve.

As a result, investors have used leverage to achieve higher rates of return because risk premia have been relatively low.

“I think that’s what’s causing some of the stress in the markets, but I believe being a long-term investor puts us in a really good position,” he says. “And being able to think long term like pension plans can and being able to provide liquidity to the market is a real advantage. That’s really what the Canadian model has been able to do over the past couple of decades.”
Canada's large liquidity providers are all thinking the same way: where do we put money at risk to generate the best risk-adjusted returns over the long run?

And there are endless opportunities out there right now: corporate bonds, European banks, emerging markets, etc.

As far as the bottom, the man who scored big during the 2008 crisis came out this morning stating the stock market could be near a bottom:



And we know how the day ended, the Dow rebounded more than 11% in its best day since 1933 as Congress nears coronavirus stimulus deal:




Is this "the" bottom everyone has been waiting for? Nobody knows, it could be a massive short squeeze giving the bears plenty of ammunition to pounce again.

But I was talking to two smart hedge fund managers earlier today who told me "the amount of fiscal and monetary stimulus going on all over the world is unprecedented" and it's hard to imagine we won't bounce back strong.

Still, I warn you, it's early innings for us in North America and while Trump wants to restart the economy ASAP, others think he's dreaming:





Pay close attention to Bill Gates, he has been warning the world that it's not ready for the next pandemic for years, and he's spot on when he states this:
“It’s very tough to say to people, ‘Hey keep going to restaurants, go buy new houses, ignore that pile of bodies over in the corner, we want you to keep spending because there’s some politician that thinks GDP growth is what counts,’” Gates said. “It’s hard to tell people during an epidemic … that they should go about things knowing their activity is spreading this disease.”
What else? An FT article came out highlighting an Oxford study stating half the UK population may be infected with coronavirus:



Here's is what a friend of mine, an expert physician in the US, shared with me on this article:
This could be true but it doesn’t change the fact that the hospital systems were overwhelmed in China and Italy because a much larger fraction of cases (10% ) than the flu need hospitalization across the age spectrum (it’s not just the mortality rate) and from those that need hospitalization because they need oxygen, you have no idea who will progress to death vs improve.

If this is true, the good news is that after a few months a large fraction of the population will be immune (i.e. the herd immunity) but you still have to go through a lot of pain in the first few months and flattening the curve makes the most sense to give everyone a chance at a ventilator. I think the authors acknowledge this.

No proof until large scale serologic studies are completed.

Stay safe.
That's my advice to everyone, stay safe, we need to accept this new reality for at least six to nine weeks and probably longer.

Below, Mark Machin, President & CEO of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and FCLTGlobal Board Member, discusses how to align asset owners and asset managers for the long term by optimizing investment mandates (2018).

More recently, FCLTGlobal is developing practical tools to address the issue of balancing long- and short-term risks. Hear from their members on how they assess, manage, and plan for investment risk.


Coronavirus Slams Norway's Giant Fund

$
0
0
Terje Solsvik and Gwladys Fouche of Reuters report that a hedge fund manager to lead Norway sovereign fund after $124 billion loss:
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the world’s largest, named a London-based hedge fund manager as its new chief executive on Thursday and said it had lost $124 billion this year as stock markets tanked due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Norwegian-born Nicolai Tangen, until now chief executive of AKO Capital, which he established in 2005, will take the helm in September, succeeding Yngve Slyngstad who announced his resignation last year.

“Tangen has built up one of Europe’s leading investment firms and has delivered very good financial results as an international investment manager,” Norwegian central bank Governor Oeystein Olsen said while announcing the appointment.

“He has extensive experience with equity management, which is the fund’s largest asset class,” Olsen told a news conference in Oslo.

The AKO Capital partnership has around 70 employees, managing around $16.4 billion, according to its own website.

By contrast, the Norwegian wealth fund is worth $930 billion - though that is down from $1.17 trillion in early February, before stock markets fell.

The wealth fund has huge market influence because it owns in region of 1.5% of the world’s listed shares. However it has seen the limit of its clout this year as the pandemic has wrought havoc.

Its investment portfolio dropped 16.2%, all but erasing the 20% gains made last year, while its stock market portfolio - its main asset class - has lost 22.8% of its value, it said.

The wealth fund, a unit of the central bank, is formally known as Norges Bank Investment Management. It invests the proceeds of Norway’s oil and gas industry in foreign stocks, bonds and real estate.

LIKE JOINING MAN UNITED

“This is not only a dream job, this is my boyhood dream job,” said Tangen via video link from London, comparing it to fellow Norwegian Ole Gunnar Solskjaer taking the job of manager at English Premier League soccer club Manchester United.

Asked what was his motivation for taking on the job given that he would be earning less money, Tangen told Reuters: “It is clearly not the money even though the salary is a very good leadership salary in Norway.”

“As a Norwegian this is a huge thing,” he said in a phone interview from London. “It is a huge honor to be asked and it is a huge responsibility to safeguard the capital of the country and the wealth of future generations.”

He declined to comment on the coronavirus outbreak, saying Slyngstad remained CEO until he took over in September.

Tangen will move back to Norway, where he is perhaps best known for donating a collection of modern art to his home town of Kristiansand, which plans to house it in a converted grain silo.

Norwegian business magazine Kapital last year estimated Tangen’s net worth to be 5.5 billion Norwegian crowns ($519 million). He could face the prospect of paying annual wealth taxes of 60-70 million crowns, likely far exceeding the salary from his new position.

Outgoing CEO Slyngstad earned 6.7 million crowns last year. He is stepping down after 12 years on the job, during which the fund’s value rose sharply thanks to rising stock markets and solid income from Norway’s energy sector.
I don't know much about Nicolai Tangen but I like what I am reading on his hedge fund's website:
We are long-term, patient and responsible investors, taking stakes in high quality, listed companies with outstanding managers. We have a rigorous, proprietary research-driven investment process.

By these means, we aim to achieve returns that materially outperform the market with lower volatility. Using estimates as at 24 March 2020, our European long-short fund has compounded at three times the rate of the market (9.9% versus the market 3.1%) since its inception nearly 15 years ago. Additionally, our European long-only fund has outperformed the market by more than 4% per annum (9.8% versus the market 5.5%). As at February 2020, we had generated more than $8.6bn in profits for our clients across all AKO funds.
Now you understand why Mr. Tangen is one of the wealthiest Norwegians in the world, his fund has delivered great results for his clients over the long run.

He's obviously not taking over the helm of Norway's sovereign wealth fund for money but for the challenge of steering this giant ship through challenging times.

I've repeatedly said that Norway has a giant beta problem. Beta is great on the way up, like last year when Norway's Fund soared 20%, but it really bites you hard on the way down, like Q1 2020 which will be one of the worst the Fund ever experiences (we shall see, it's not over yet).

Let me be more specific, Norway takes on too much public equity risk which exposes the fund to too much volatility. Who cares? It has a long-term focus and can absorb all this volatility.

True, but it can and should do a lot more to deliver more consistent and higher risk-adjusted returns over the long run.

Let me give you an example. Look at CPPIB's asset mix as at March 31, 2019:


Even though it's a year old, it hasn't changed much. Just like Norway's Fund, the CPP Fund also takes equity risk, lots of it, but it spreads it more evenly between private (24%) and public equities (33%).

More importantly, it invests and co-invests with top private equity partners all over the world, ensuring great long-term performance and significantly reducing its fee drag.

It also invests in infrastructure, real estate and private debt all over the world, further diversifying its portfolio.

Now, don't get me wrong, CPPIB and other Canadian pensions aren't immune to what is going on out there with this pandemic. Private equity, real estate and infrastructure investments are getting hit too.

For example, CPPIB owns 50% of Highway 407 and it will take a hit from the fact that this toll road won't generate the toll revenue over the next few months. OTPP owns major stakes in European airports, it too will get hit on these infrastructure investments over the short run.

Longer term, however, these investments will generate significant cash flows and even if they are marked down temporarily, they will bounce back.

The same thing for real estate and private equity investments. Of course they aren't immune and even if they're not marked to market, they too will experience significant losses, but over the long run, they will bounce back.

By the way, private equity firms have a record $1.5 trillion in cash ready to deploy and have been actively seeking deals across the struggling travel, entertainment and energy industries. They have been waiting for this type of market dislocation for a long time:



I was talking to someone earlier today who told me "this year will be a great vintage year" for PE firms and I agree.

But Norway's giant fund doesn't invest in private equity or infrastructure, only a bit in listed and unlisted real estate (less than 3%), so its portfolio is marked to market and that means it's much more susceptible to large market swings.

Now, I don't want to belabor the point of market swings because every large pension and sovereign wealth fund will experience huge losses in Q1 2020, as will well-known investors getting crushed in these markets:




But Berkshire has $120 billion in cash to deploy and I'm sure Buffett is buying up great companies. I can say the same about Norway, CPPIB and other large funds, they will be buying great companies at deep discounts.

But it is a very challenging environment and all sorts of gurus are coming out to make their prognostications:



For what it's worth, here is mine, I wouldn't get too excited about this week's snapback relief rally.

Why? It's end of quarter, a lot of pensions and sovereign wealth funds are rebalancing, selling bonds and buying up equities, so I expected a big bounce but is it sustainable?

Here are a couple of charts I posted earlier today on LinkedIn stating: "Notice the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) rallied back to its 200-week moving average (and close to its 20-day EMA) but here is where things will get sticky folks so temper your enthusiasm, this is as much of a V-shaped recovery as you will see for the time being":



Stocks are experiencing a great week but we all expected a big relief rally and these are the easy gains. It remains to be seen how sustainable these rallies are in the face of a coravirus pandemic where the US economy is getting hit hard:





No doubt, stocks move in anticipation of a recovery, but it's way too early to talk recovery given we're in the eye of the storm.

Moreover, it's important to note that this horrific jobless claims report is actually worse than meets the eye, it's only the beginning of a deluge of negative economic news and the economy won't bounce back quickly:
“There will be a very significant drop back in unemployment when the number of new coronavirus infections fall and the economy begins to reopen, but it won’t reverse all of these losses,” Capital Economics’ Ashworth said. “The unemployment rate could remain elevated for years.”
Lastly, it really irritates me when some private equity boss slams the German government for its response to the cornavirus outbreak, stating "I'd rather have the flu than I would a broken economy":



Unbelievably, this guy is a former surgeon who should know better (he comes across as an arrogant jerk!):
The 60-year-old Dibelius, who began his career as a surgeon, appeared to be an adherent of the herd immunity strategy. This involves allowing parts of society who would likely suffer mild illness from the virus to become immune.

«I'm more afraid of the collective shutdown of the economy and social welfare, conducted with nearly no discussion and with the argument of morality, than I am of the virus itself,» Dibelius said. «I'd rather have a flu than I would a broken economy.»
I'm not saying he's completely out to lunch but herd immunity is a dangerous strategy which can backfire in a spectacular way, which is why the UK did a 180 degree turn and dropped it.

This is also why governments are desperately trying to flatten the curve not to overwhelm their healthcare system. From what we know, this virus is hitting a lot of younger people in New York where the hospitalization rate (18% in article but 40% today) is twice as high as the global average, so I'm not so sure "herd immunity" would have worked there:



Luckily, more informed voices are stating we need an "extreme shutdown" to deal with this outbreak and I think they are right as are the experts who state "the virus sets the timeline" of when the economy can reopen safely:





On that note, it's a good time to remind my subscribers that Pension Pulse runs on donations, not government handouts. I thank those of you who take the time to donate and/or subscribe using the PayPal options on the top left-hand side of this blog. Stay safe everyone.

Below, hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones, founder of Tudor Investment and JUST Capital, tells CNBC's "Squawk Box" that he thinks the market could be higher as soon as three months from now despite what he sees as a turbulent month ahead.

Niall Ferguson, Milbank Family Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, joins"Closing Bell" to discuss the coronavirus outbreak and why Paul Tudor Jones is wrong stating 40K will die in a worst case scenario.

I think Ferguson is right, this isn't the flu (hate idiots who claim so) and we still don't know how this virus will play out in the coming weeks and months.

Also, if you heard Dr. Anthony Fauci on CNN last night, he stated there will be second and third waves and that Africa and Australia are going into their winter season and this virus will erupt there and lurk. He's also right: "the virus sets the timeline" (I also like what he says about vitamin D, it doesn't hurt and I take 20,000 IUs once a week).

All this to say, stop listening to hedge fund gurus or brokers, when it comes to COVID-19, I only listen to infectious disease experts like Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx and a few others like professor Hugh Montgomery who thinks the UK will be unable to cope with the 'tsunami' of coronavirus cases.




Canada's Top 10 Pensions in Big Trouble?

$
0
0
Zane Schwartz of The Logic reports Canada’s 10 biggest pension funds have lost an estimated $104 billion in public equity amid market chaos:
When the S&P 500 closed at a record high on February 19, Canada’s major pension plans, with more than a quarter of their investments in stocks, were in a comfortable position in spite of the looming coronavirus pandemic.

Five weeks later, Canada’s 10 largest pension funds — upon which millions of Canadians are relying for retirement—have lost an estimated $104 billion, according to an analysis by The Logic.

But not all pensions are created equal, and while some—including the country’s largest, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB)—have high exposure to public markets, others have managed to mostly skirt the crash that has seen the S&P 500 lose roughly US$8 trillion this year.

Canada’s 10 largest pension funds have an average of 27 per cent of their assets invested in the public markets, based on an analysis of each firm’s disclosed asset allocation when last reporting their finances. With a combined $1.7 trillion in assets, they have more than $500 billion invested in public equity markets.


It’s not just public equity that can impact the health of pensions. They are also vulnerable to swings in other asset classes, such as fixed income, private equity, real estate and infrastructure, areas that have also taken a hit in the crisis. Mortgage applications in the U.S. dropped 29.4 per cent last week and capital from seed-stage funding has decreased about 22 per cent globally since January. Currency fluctuations are also a risk, particularly the Canadian-to-U.S.-dollar exchange, which has dropped about 30 per cent since its 2011 high.

While all 10 funds are long-term investors with diversified portfolios, some are more susceptible to market swings than others.

British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (BCI), which manages funds for over 2.3 million people, is the most exposed to public equity, which represents 41 per cent of its $153.4 billion in assets. Asked to comment on The Logic’s estimate it has lost about $8.5 billion in public equities since it last reported, external communications manager Ben O’Hara-Byrne said the fund was looking for long-term returns.

“BCI had been anticipating and prepared for a market downturn by defensively positioning and diversifying our clients’ portfolios,” said O’Hara-Byrne.


CPPIB had $140.8 billion invested in public equity as of Dec. 31, 2019, or about 27 per cent of its portfolio. It declined to share how much it had in public equity after the market drop. “The Fund is not immune to occasional, severe drops in the value of stocks. Indeed, of course, the current situation is impacting the Fund,” said Michel Leduc, global head of communications.

“The Fund is demonstrating significant resilience relative to much sharper drops observed in public equity markets globally.”

The Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec has the second-largest dollar amount invested in public equity: $116.9 billion, representing 34 per cent of its assets.

“The world and the markets are obviously facing challenging times,” said Maxime Chagnon, head of global media relations. “We are monitoring our portfolio and various asset classes very closely in this exceptional situation.”

Not all of the big 10 pension funds are so exposed to public equity. The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan’s public equity holdings comprised just 10 per cent of its assets, according to its most recent financial report. Asked for comment, Teachers’ said that its 2019 results will be reported next week.

“Teachers’ is a more mature plan when you compare it to their peers. Their population is older. Their pensioner-to-active ratio is shrinking. They’re very much looking to manage risk within a different tolerance,” said Andrew Whale, a principal at consulting firm Mercer Canada.

OPTrust, which manages a defined benefit plan for over 96,000 public-sector workers in Ontario, had the least exposure to public equity, at just six per cent.

“Many pension plans around the world tend to have an over-concentration to the equity risk factor. We are very focused on trying to deliver on our pension promise with the lowest risk possible,” James Davis, OPTrust’s chief investment officer, told The Logic, adding that its portfolio is fully funded.

The Alberta Investment Management Corporation’s (AIMCo) public equity holdings made up $41.5 billion when it last reported for the year ended March 31, 2019—36 per cent of the pension’s total holdings. AIMCo said it would report more recent numbers in mid-April.

“The recent volatility in investment markets and decline in economic activity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic is truly unprecedented,” said Dénes Németh, AIMCo’s corporate communication director.

“This has created significant challenges for institutional investment, but adherence to prudent management of our clients’ portfolios, coupled with the long-term investment horizon of our clients and a broadly diversified portfolio both in terms of asset classes and geographies, will allow our clients to weather the market downturn, as we have on their behalf in the past.”

In recent years, Canada’s top pension plans have been widely heralded as global leaders for both their stability and rapid increase in assets. In 2017, the World Bank Group commissioned a report on Canadian pensions to help pension funds in emerging economies model their systems. In November 2019, five Canadian pension funds were ranked among the top 100 global asset managers.

“Canada’s major pensions really are world-class,” said Whale. “They’re set up to report for decades to come, and are set up to get through this kind of short-term volatility.”

“It’s a big loss for such a short period of time. The major pensions are being hammered from all sides right now. Public equities are dropping at the same time government bond yields are at an all time low,” said Whale.

Mercer Canada’s pension health index ended February at 103 per cent, which means pensions were slightly overfunded, with more money than obligations. That’s dropped to 88 per cent as of March 20.

That’s light years ahead of the U.S., whose largest fund, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), has a funding ratio of 70.1 percent, according to the Center for Retirement Research. CalPERS reported last week that it had lost about US$67 billion in market value since January.

When a pension is underfunded, one of three things can happen: employers, workers or both can make more contributions; the pensions can cut benefits; or the fund can earn a higher return on its remaining investments.

For funds that aren’t over-leveraged in public equities, this is a time that can also create value.

“I think taking the opportunity to add modestly to our equity holdings now is the right thing to do,” said OPTrust’s Davis. “But we’re looking at it across all asset classes. And so, my private markets teams have a lot of dry powder, as well, and they’re in a position to be able to add as opportunities present themselves.”
The first thing that went through my mind after reading this article is: "OMG! Ben O’Hara-Byrne was a high school classmate of mine!" (great guy).

Last time I saw Ben was on CTV News covering major news stories so I'm glad he's over at BCI now handling communications. Stay safe Ben, hope you and everyone at BCI are doing well.

Now, let me get to this article which was published in "The Logic" and then the National Post picked it up because that newspaper loves slamming Canada's large public pensions.

Canadian pensions getting clobbered by coronavirus? You don't say, eh?

Let me be clear here folks, the great coronavirus unwinding is slamming everyone except for short sellers preparing for a market crash.

No pension fund is immune to what is going on in these markets.

Yesterday, I covered how Norway's giant sovereign wealth fund is getting clobbered because it's asset mix is 65% global stocks, 30% bonds and roughly 5% real estate (listed and unlisted).

I stated the following:
I've repeatedly said that Norway has a giant beta problem. Beta is great on the way up, like last year when Norway's Fund soared 20%, but it really bites you hard on the way down, like Q1 2020 which will be one of the worst the Fund ever experiences (we shall see, it's not over yet).

Let me be more specific, Norway takes on too much public equity risk which exposes the fund to too much volatility. Who cares? It has a long-term focus and can absorb all this volatility.

True, but it can and should do a lot more to deliver more consistent and higher risk-adjusted returns over the long run.

Let me give you an example. Look at CPPIB's asset mix as at March 31, 2019:



Even though it's a year old, it hasn't changed much. Just like Norway's Fund, the CPP Fund also takes equity risk, lots of it, but it spreads it more evenly between private (24%) and public equities (33%).

More importantly, it invests and co-invests with top private equity partners all over the world, ensuring great long-term performance and significantly reducing its fee drag.

It also invests in infrastructure, real estate and private debt all over the world, further diversifying its portfolio.

Now, don't get me wrong, CPPIB and other Canadian pensions aren't immune to what is going on out there with this pandemic. Private equity, real estate and infrastructure investments are getting hit too.

For example, CPPIB owns 50% of Highway 407 and it will take a hit from the fact that this toll road won't generate the toll revenue over the next few months. OTPP owns major stakes in European airports, it too will get hit on these infrastructure investments over the short run.

Longer term, however, these investments will generate significant cash flows and even if they are marked down temporarily, they will bounce back.

The same thing for real estate and private equity investments. Of course they aren't immune and even if they're not marked to market, they too will experience significant losses, but over the long run, they will bounce back.
Earlier this week, I covered how Canadian pensions are staying the course, taking a long-term view on their investments, diversifying across public and private markets all over the world and doing as many direct deals as possible (primarily through co-investments).

Mark Machin, CEO of CPPIB, updated Canadians stating CPP Fund is built for the long haul, and he ended on this note:
Over the past 21 years, we’ve grown the CPP Fund from $36.9 billion to $420.4 billion; and the most recent report by the Chief Actuary of Canada, released in December 2019, states the Fund continues to be sustainable for more than 75 years. This performance was made possible by the diverse skills, deep expertise, and network of relationships we’ve built over the years.

We don’t yet know the full impact of COVID-19. It will continue to affect the global economy and like other global investors, we will not be immune.We believe strongly, however, that our long-term investing view, our deep bench of talent and expertise, and our highly-diversified portfolio will continue to serve the Canadians who depend on us for the safety of their retirements. To all 20 million Canadians who participate in the CPP – it is with kindness to one another and confidence in the systems in place, like the CPP, that we will endure.
Now, it's important to note that CPP Fund will typically underperform its benchmark (which is made up of 85% global stocks and 15% global bonds) when stocks are soaring but outperform it when stocks are sinking.

This is because 55% of its portfolio is made up of private equity, real estate, infrastructure and private debt. Again, these asset classes are not immune to the crisis but they're not marked to market and over the long run, they will perform well and deliver more consistent returns.

The article above is terrible for a lot of reasons. CPPIB, CDPQ, PSP, BCI and AIMCo are pension funds, not pension plans like HOOPP, OTPP, OMERS and OPTrust.

BCI is a pension fund and only recently ramping up its direct PE deals so it's not fair to make big assertions on their asset mix and losses. There's no doubt they're more exposed to public equities but they have been more defensive and are moving to allocate more to private markets.

I hate when people compare Canada's large pensions as if they are all the same, they're not. They have different liabilities, maturities, asset mixes, foreign exchange hedging policies, etc. 

Pension plans have a lot more bonds in their asset mix because they're matching assets with liabilities very closely. Their focus is on asset-liability matching, not maximizing returns without taking undue risks (it's an important nuance).

Bearing this in mind, it doesn't shock me if these large Canadian pension plans do a bit better than large Canadian pension funds when stock markets get hit hard, but who cares? Over the long run, every large Canadian pension is delivering strong results because they all have great governance.

Also, as HOOPP's retiring CEO Jim Keohane told me earlier this week, as long bond yields approach zero, they too need to start investing more in other asset classes like infrastructure to make their target rate-of-return. 

The important point is Canada's large pensions are in great shape, they will get hit due to cornavirus but are able to weather this storm a lot better than their US counterparts, and they will come out ahead once again three, five and ten years down the road.

CalPERS recently disclosed it lost about $67 billion in market value since January as the coronavirus pandemic roiled global financial markets.

If CalPERS is getting hit, everyone is getting hit. 

But unlike Canada's large pensions, many US state pensions are underfunded or chronically underfunded, and the drop in long bond yields coupled with the market rout will place many of them in a very precarious position.

Canadian pensions are well funded, a few are overfunded, so they can absorb these shocks a lot better and are able to take advantage of market dislocations a lot quicker (their governance and the fact that they can leverage their balance sheet also helps them be a lot more aggressive and nimble when needed).

Now, let me be clear, there's no Canadian pension which will escape the carnage from COVID-19. You can stress test your portfolio for a lot of negative shocks, a pandemic isn't one of them.

Importantly, as I keep telling people, a pandemic is deflationary, it will hit all asset classes, public and private with a vengeance except for nominal bonds, which are pretty much the only hedge against deflation.

But the drop in long bond rates to ultra-low record levels leaves many pensions in a bind, they cannot make their required rate-of-return investing in long bonds so they need to take intelligent risks across public and private markets and manage their costs a lot better.

Lastly, I believe COVID-19 is a wake-up call for global policymakers, the entire world was ill-prepared for it and we need to do a much better job preparing for the next pandemic.

Pensions losses will eventually be made up, lives lost won't so please stop focusing on negative articles on Canada's pensions which are among the best in the world and start listening to medical experts. Stay safe and stay home!!

Below, Finance Minister Bill Morneau and Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz hold a news conference in Ottawa following the central bank's announcement that it is lowering its key interest rate to 0.25% in response to the economic impact of the ongoing COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic as well as the decline in global oil prices.

It is worth noting this from the Bank of Canada's announcement:
Today, the Bank is launching two new programs.

First, the Commercial Paper Purchase Program (CPPP) will help to alleviate strains in short-term funding markets and thereby preserve a key source of funding for businesses. Details of the program will be available on the Bank’s web site.

Second, to address strains in the Government of Canada debt market and to enhance the effectiveness of all other actions taken so far, the Bank will begin acquiring Government of Canada securities in the secondary market. Purchases will begin with a minimum of $5 billion per week, across the yield curve. The program will be adjusted as conditions warrant, but will continue until the economic recovery is well underway. The Bank’s balance sheet will expand as a result of these purchases.
Earlier this week, the Fed cut rates to zero and engaged in QE Infinity worried the US commercial mortgage market was on the brink of collapse. The Bank of Canada had no choice but to follow suit.

Second, Michael Purves of Tallbacken Capital Advisors discusses the major market moves this week, and the stress levels that could keep this from being a more sustainable rally.

I've repeatedly warned my readers, temper your enthusiasm, these relief rallies are powerful and give many the false sense of hope, but this isn't over and we will see wild gyrations in markets as negative news on the economic and health front hit us.

Third, Bill Gates, co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Microsoft, weighs in on what he thinks the world is learning about pandemics from COVID-19 and what the role of the public and private sector is during circumstances like this. Great insights, listen closely to Gates.



The Next Retirement Crisis?

$
0
0
Michael Santoli of CNBC reports the traditional retirement portfolio of stocks and bonds is down 20% for only the fourth time since WWII:
The coronavirus crisis has punished the blameless across the world this year. That includes investors who did the supposed “right thing,” by keeping a balanced portfolio to fund long-term gains, just as the experts advise.

As the stock-market cascaded to its recent lows this month, the traditional portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds suffered a greater than 20% decline from its peak value, for only the fourth time since World War II.

At last Monday’s low, this standard retirement allocation, as represented by the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund, was 22% off its peak Feb. 19 value – driven mostly of course by the 30% tumble in equity indexes that bonds only partially buffered. In fact, near the worst of the stock sell-off bonds were not offsetting the losses by rallying, as everything but cash was liquidated.


Upon request, Ritholtz Wealth Management research director Michael Batnick went back in history to track each time the 60/40 portfolio had taken at least a 20% hit. Such a decline struck initially at only the following points since 1945 (using month-end data for 60% S&P 500 and 40% five-year Treasuries): August 1974, September 2002 and January 2009.

The fact that the 60/40 autopilot approach has only retreated by 20% on a monthly basis four times in 75 years is itself a testament to the smoothing effects of offsetting equity-fixed income interplay.

What happened next after the prior 20% setbacks? Those months were all within months of the trough of major bear markets, though in each case the ultimate low for the stock indexes was still to come.

Batnick calculates that in those three instances in 1974, 2002 and 2009, it took between 10 and 20 months for this portfolio to recover back to its peak level.

An investor who kept to the disciplined approach and rebalanced holdings back to the 60/40 asset split at the end of the month when a 20% decline was first registered would have been positioned for attractive returns in subsequent years.

In those three instances, the average annual total return from the 60/40 portfolio was close to 12% over the following five years. That’s a healthy advantage over the very long-term average yearly return of around 9% for this asset allocation.

This is perhaps comforting, if not terribly surprising. Any investment discipline that triggers a move to take advantage of steep underperformance in one asset classes tends to be rewarded over time. And rebalancing after big declines in a blended-asset portfolio has generally been about buying nasty breaks in stock indexes.

Is 60/40 stance broken?

On a more opportunistic, shorter-term basis, strategist Terry Gardner of C.J. Lawrence last week noted that simply buying the S&P 500 the last three times it’s dropped 25% from a peak (1987, 2001 and 2008), as it did this month, has always led to positive returns over the next year – even though in none of those instances did the minus-25% level represent the ultimate low for stocks. Those returns one year out were 20% after 1987, 2.5% after 2001 and 18% after 2008.

Are there reasons to be skeptical that holding fast to the 60/40 stance this time will not fare as well as in past decades? Some investment professionals have discussed for some time that the essential premise of the 60/40 mix has been challenged due to extremely low bond yields that leave far less room for bonds to appreciate in an economic slowdown or crisis, mitigating their value as ballast to stocks.

Goldman Sachs strategists last week sounded a cautious note on this front last week with regard to the present market skid. “In addition to the sharper-than-normal equity correction, diversification in 60/40 portfolios has been less good,” the firm said. “With bond yields at all-time lows now and close to the effective lower bound, there is little space for most [developed-market] bonds to buffer equity drawdowns.”

Stretching deeper into history, skeptics might note the 60/40 portfolio carried a 20% loss for longer stretches in the 1930s, when stocks stayed deep underwater during the entire Great Depression.

So perhaps the traditional asset mix will get less help over time from bond yields squeezing lower in tough times (barring a move to negative yields, which would create a whole other set of issues). Still, bonds can still serve the role as cushion against equity losses.

Rebalancing aided the bounce?

The entire issue of rebalancing is hardly just an academic issue. The impulse from pension funds and automated asset-allocation vehicles to shift hundreds of billions in assets from fixed-income to stocks was detailed by strategists across Wall Street and was at least one significant driver of the surge in the S&P 500 into Thursday’s close.

The S&P 500 at its low point last week was underperforming the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index by some 30 percentage points year to date. Bespoke Investment Group notes that this effectively turned a 60/40 portfolio into a 55/45 mix, requiring one of the bigger rebalancing moves in years.

Of course, to the extent that this mechanical reallocation is timed to the quarter’s end, it means one short-term tailwind for the rebound rally has just about abated, as the market bounce leaves the indexes less stretched and investors have celebrated fresh trillions of dollars in support from the Federal Reserve and Congress.

Strategist Tony Dwyer of Canaccord Genuity, who’s been waiting for a retest of last week’s low to get more aggressively positioned, noted Friday, “Over coming days, the market will not be as oversold, the pension rebalancing will be done, and the bulk of monetary and fiscal stimulus will have been announced.”

While those factors could present a test of the immediate resilience of the market’s attempted comeback, they don’t much alter the case for long-term investors to take what the market has served up with its swift retrenchment this month.
It remains to be seen if the market "retests" its low from last Monday or slices right below it.

As of Monday afternoon, stock market indexes are all up led by tech stocks (XLK) and I think investors are taking comfort in the fact the Fed wants everyone to know "the Fed put" is alive and well even if rates are at zero:



“One of the questions asked most frequently is, isn’t the Fed out of ammunition? No, they still have plenty of tricks in their bag. Moving into further purchases of risk assets is one of the things they could do,” said Lauren Goodwin, economist and multi-asset portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments.
But the Fed needs to be careful here because sometimes it makes a situation far worse, like in the mortgage market where bankers warn Fed mortgage purchases unbalanced the market, forcing margin calls:



In its letter to regulators, the MBA said:  “The dramatic price volatility in the market for agency mortgage-backed securities [MBS] over the past week is leading to broker-dealer margin calls on mortgage lenders’ hedge positions that are unsustainable for many such lenders.”

The letter went on to say, “Margin calls on mortgage lenders reached staggering and unprecedented levels by the end of the week. For a significant number of lenders, many of which are well-capitalized, these margin calls are eroding their working capital and threatening their ability to continue to operate.”
Anyway, back to the article on top, it got me thinking of the next major retirement crisis.



One former senior pension fund manager shared this with me:
That article was cherry-picking the peak to trough move, which always makes things seem more extreme.

I find it surprising that markets are not down more. A 60/40 portfolio would be up over 5% from Jan 1, 2019, despite the fact that we are now in something between a recession and depression.

As I said in my email last week, I think there is a lot more downside and that the world in the future will look very different and will certainly be less profitable and less about maximizing shareholder returns. So I don't see how markets will go back to a 20+ multiple. 
The last email he is referring to came after he read my comment on whether Canada's top ten pensions are in trouble, sharing this:
I think that the big Canadian pension plans will be fine, they are well managed and came into this situation in very good financial shape. However this is going to be a disaster for US states and municipal plans. It was just a matter of time for many of them as their pension plans were so poorly funded, even when using completely unrealistic return expectation. 

Now these governments are having to pile on debt to bail out their economies. This may give them political cover to break their pension promises.

One thing that could hurt Canadian pension plans is longer term effects of the coronavirus on the assets they own. Two things come to mind - real estate and some types of infrastructure. This crisis may just hasten the demise of the retail sector and commercial office space. For example, OTPP owns about 17% of Macerich which is a publicly traded US REIT. It is down 92% from the end of 2015. The office sector has been booming in some parts of Canada but that may change if companies decide to take less space in the future as they find that employees can work efficiently from home.

Airports and toll roads are taking a HUGE hit in the short term. Will traffic volumes come all the way back? Did anyone do a worst case scenario for Hwy 407 that saw traffic down 90% for a month or more? These assets may need equity injections to stay viable, and their long term valuations may shrink as globablization reverses and the flight volumes at airports decreases.

I also think that long term equity markets will do less well due to (1) lower long term earnings, and (2) lower P/E multiples. Taxes are going to have to go up to pay for these bailouts and that will have to come from somewhere. Companies, and society, will now focus more on resiliency than efficiency which will hurt profits. Will the Eurozone survive this crisis? And this crisis is showing us that there are a lot of unseen risks in the world and you can't be pricing markets for perfection at a 20 P/E multiple. That just won't work over the long run.

The other risk that I am worried about in the long term is inflation. How are governments going to pay back all of the debt being issued? Do they inflate their way out of this problem?

I have more questions than answers but I think the future will look very different than the last 25 years, and I think we are going back to valuation ratios that we saw from 1880-1995 rather than what we have seen for the last 25 years. And note that we are STILL at high ratios in the US - to get to a P/E10 ratio of 10 markets have to fall by another 50%+. I don't think that will happen but I don't think we are going to see a snap back to an S&P500 of 3300 any time soon.


If you haven't already heard this I suggest you listen to this Recode/Decode podcast featuring Chamath Palihapitiya from last week (click here or here to listen to it).
This person is extremely knowledgeable, has tremendous experience and he is providing my readers with excellent food for thought.

We do not know the long-term effects of coronavirus and if we get into a serious recession or worse, depression, you'd better believe markets are going to feel the pain, even if the Fed goes all BoJ and starts buying up ETFs like the S&P 500 ETF (SPY).

A buddy of mine texted me earlier telling me he loves Microsoft (MSFT) BCE Inc (BCE) and Mastercard (MA), they are "saving his portfolio". I said I love these companies too but also told him to temper his enthusiasm.

Everybody is telling me this stock market crash feels like 1987, the ferocity of the selloff feels a lot like that year.

Then you have all the gurus (Bill Ackman, David Tepper, Paul Tudor Jones) telling us this is the time to get greedy.

Really? Do they have a crystal ball? Are they willing to forego all their massive fees if they're wrong and give money back to their investors?




When I look at the traditional portfolio of 60% stocks/ 40% bonds (VBINX), I see a lot of pain out there:


And unlike Canada's large well governed DB pensions, these retail investors can't pool investment or longevity risk, so if they are retiring soon, they're in big trouble.

What else? Unlike Canada's large well governed DB pensions, retail investors can only invest in stocks and bonds, not private equity, infrastructure, unlisted real estate, private debt, commodities, etc.

They also can't invest in top hedge funds getting bailed out by the Fed and CTAs crushing it as oil prices sink to new lows:





By the way, Pierre Andurand didn't just call the plunge in oil prices right, he also called the entire coronavirus crisis right and early on, he  saw what I saw, namely, a disaster in the making as asymptomatic people spread the virus to everyone.

Anyway, I am worried about two things right now:
  1. Chronically underfunded US state and municipal pensions which are on the brink of collapse
  2. And a generation of people retiring who are condemned to pension poverty
Again, it's not well governed large Canadian pensions I'm worried about, all of them will get hit but they can weather the storm.

It's the pensions which came into this crisis in bad shape with a terrible funded status as well as people with no pensions at all who just saw their retirement accounts get creamed and probably sold at the wrong time.

The next retirement crisis is already upon us. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.

Sure, there's unprecedented fiscal and monetary policies all over the world but that’s a symptom of the crisis at hand.

I might be wrong, markets might continue surprising everyone, climbing the wall of worry, but I think it's highly unlikely, especially since the economic fallout will likely linger for some time.

Who knows? Maybe the market is anticipating a major breakthrough, peak deaths, or whatever, but if you've been listening to Dr. Fauci very closely, you'd better brace for more bad news ahead: 




By the way, Evangelos Momios, Senior Director and Financials Sector Head at PSP Investments, posted three hopeful charts on LinkedIn yesterday from New York Governor Cuomo's press conference:




I thought these were excellent charts and I shared them with some friends.

A friend of mine in New York said this: "Unfortunately I think this is only noise. Deaths peak about three weeks after the beginning of a lockdown so for NYC that would be the end of next week ... it will be ten times that I fear.”

Another close friend of mine, a top physician in the US, shared this with me:
Go here and enter state of New York at the top and you can see they predict peak count of daily deaths in ~9 days. You can compare to other states which are mostly 3-4 weeks away for peak daily deaths. New York is woefully short of beds in the hospitals and ICU…..the worst shortage numbers I have seen for any state at this site. They are and will continue to be triaging ventilators - that means if you need one at the same time as someone else, there will be rationing based on chances of survival (so older subjects with co-morbidities will be let go). New England is generally in a lot of trouble because density of population and lack of beds/ventilators. Florida is OK…... California needs some ventilators, not beds. In general, densely populated states are in worse shape than less densely populated states.
I trust my friend, he's not only a top physician, he's a top epidemiologist who understands the numbers better than anyone else.

I also believe China is blatantly lying about its coronavirus figures. So is Iran and so are others. The only data I trust is from developed countries and even there, it varies between countries and even states/ provinces (some are way ahead of others in terms of testing and tracking).

Lastly, everone is talking about this op-ed on how if everyone wore some sort of mask (not just an N95 mask), it could help flatten the curve.



It makes perfect sense, there's also a video circulating on YouTube on how we all need masks, but I warn you, if you can't make or get masks, it's much more sensible to stay home, stay healthy, and if you venture out, avoid crowds, and wash your hands thoroughly the minute you get back home.

It's annoying, it's painful but next time you whine about it, think about the hell those frontline healthcare workers at our hospitals are witnessing and just stay home, you will potentially be saving lives, including your own.

Remember, even if it's benign for most people, it's deadly to others, and you simply don't know who it will impact and how hard it will impact them. You also don't know if you're carrying it and are asymptomatic and spreading it which is why you need to practice physical distancing and just stay home as much as possible.

This morning, my friend in New York texted me telling his friend was rushed to the hospital and is now on a ventilator in the ICU of the hospital. This is a healthy 48-year old male, a father and husband of a healthcare worker who had high fever that wasn't breaking so his wife rushed him to the hospital.

I just pray they will be able to treat him successfully but I'm sharing this because people need to understand, this virus isn't something to fool around with and everyone needs to their part so we can get past this nightmare, and that's what this is, a total nightmare and some have it a lot worse than others, so please stay home, stay safe and stay healthy!!

Below, Guggenheim Global CIO Scott Minerd joins'Fast Money' to discuss his recent paper and where he thinks the economy could he headed if the coronavirus pandemic continues.

And Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, explains the latest timeline and expectations around COVID-19 in the US as well as Trump’s change of course.

Fully Funded OTPP Gains 10.4% in 2019

$
0
0
The Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan (OTPP) just released its 2019 results, gaining 10.4% for the year as net assets reach $207.4 billion at year-end 2019:
Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (Ontario Teachers’) today announced a total-fund net return of 10.4% for the year. Net assets reached $207.4 billion as of December 31, 2019, a $16.3 billion increase from December 31, 2018. Ontario Teachers’ earned $20.2 billion in investment income in 2019, the most in the organization’s history.

“Ontario Teachers’ diversified, high-quality portfolio achieved a total-fund net return of 10.4% and our net assets reached $207.4 billion to end the year,” said Jo Taylor, President and Chief Executive Officer. “The investment world since then has changed dramatically due to COVID-19, which is having an impact on all of our activities. We are highly focused on the wellbeing of our members and employees, and our team has demonstrated remarkable agility as we adapt the way we work while maintaining our high levels of service.”

As of January 1, 2020, the plan was fully funded using prudent assumptions for a seventh consecutive year, with 100% inflation protection being provided on all pensions.

As at December 31, 2019, Ontario Teachers’ has had an annualized total-fund net return of 9.7% since inception. The five- and ten-year net returns, also as at December 31, 2019, were 7.8% and 9.8%, respectively.

“Each of our asset classes achieved positive returns during the year, showing the value of a well-constructed and diversified portfolio. We had particularly strong returns in equities and fixed income,” said Ziad Hindo, Chief Investment Officer. “This year was a transformational year, with a number of significant transactions conducted globally, the launch of Teachers’ Innovation Platform to invest in disruptive technology, and the creation of Koru, an incubator that partners with our portfolio companies to design and build new digital businesses.”

As often is the case in years when public equity markets have exceptional returns, Ontario Teachers’ diversified portfolio trailed its benchmark. Strong returns in private assets did not keep up with robust public equity markets, many of which were up more than 20% during the year. In 2019, Ontario Teachers’ underperformed its benchmark by 1.8% or $2.7 billion.


Total fund local return was 12.8%. Ontario Teachers’ invests in dozens of global currencies and in more than 50 countries but reports its assets and liabilities in Canadian dollars. In 2019, currency had a negative 1.8% impact on the total fund, resulting in a loss of $3.5 billion. The currency loss was mainly driven by the appreciation of the Canadian dollar relative to various global currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar.

About Ontario Teachers’

The Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board (Ontario Teachers') is the administrator of Canada's largest single-profession pension plan, with $207.4 billion in net assets (all figures at December 31, 2019). It holds a diverse global portfolio of assets, approximately 80% of which is managed in-house, and has earned an annual total-fund net return of 9.7% since the plan's founding in 1990. Ontario Teachers' is an independent organization headquartered in Toronto. Its Asia-Pacific region office is located in Hong Kong and its Europe, Middle East & Africa region office is in London. The defined-benefit plan, which is fully funded, invests and administers the pensions of the province of Ontario's 329,000 active and retired teachers. For more information, visit otpp.com and follow us on Twitter @OtppInfo.
This afternoon, I had a chance to speak with OTPP's CEO, Jo Taylor, to discuss last year's results and to go over the current crisis.

I want to thank Jo for taking some time to speak with me, as well as thank Lori McLeod, Director External Communications, for fixing a little WebEx glitch and calling into me and Jo so we can chat.

Our time was limited but we went over the important points.

Before I begin, however, I think it's important to go over Jo Taylor's report to members in the 2019 Annual Report:
It is a prodigious time to step into the role of CEO at Ontario Teachers', as we celebrate our 30th year of successfully delivering a secure retirement to plan members. As its fourth CEO, I am honoured to be trusted with this important position, and grateful to have benefitted from the accumulated wisdom of those who have held the job previously. This is particularly true of our past CEO, Ron Mock, who gave strong guidance to me and shared reflections on how best to shape Ontario Teachers’ future priorities. Each CEO of Ontario Teachers’ has focused on specific areas during their tenure. This initially included setting up the right governance model to invest and deliver the necessary returns, and then managing through market fluctuations and a global financial crisis. For my role today, there are some challenging dynamics around funding cash flows, member demographics, a low-growth environment, climate change, highly competitive investment markets and now the COVID-19 pandemic.

I plan to focus on three key areas:
  • Growth and International. Assets are growing significantly, and we will have a large amount of capital to manage in a competitive environment. It will be crucial to find the right opportunities, and to expand our international footprint into the right territories.
  • Partnerships and Relationships. This has been one of our key strengths, involving the thoughtful selection of partners who we can learn from, and who value what we bring to the table. This extends to the huge importance placed on working with our stakeholders to deepen these relationships.
  • Talent and Culture. Ontario Teachers’ has to look far into the future, ensuring it has the right skills in place. This means encouraging our agility in thinking and decision making, developing talent and integrating inclusion and diversity at all levels.
Growing assets, expanding our international footprint

I have set the challenge to colleagues to build a strategy to grow the plan’s assets under management to $300 billion by the end of 2030. Investing this capital in a low-interest and lower-growth environment will require the team to have a bold and ambitious mindset. In 2019, we were able to design a clear international road map for our investment activities and identify where we needed to build execution capabilities. The expected outcome of this effort will be to rebalance our portfolio and returns more evenly between North America and the rest of the world.

The value of local expertise can’t be overstated, which is something I can attest to, having formerly led both Ontario Teachers’ London and Hong Kong offices. Careful consideration has been given to the value of having another office in Asia-Pacific, and given the uncertainties and challenges in Hong Kong, it is the right time for us to open a Singapore office, which we currently expect to be operational in the third quarter of this year. Latin America also remains an important region, and we will be exploring models to enhance our local execution capabilities there.

Selective partnerships and deeper relationships

Ontario Teachers’ is distinct from most other investors in the way it approaches partnerships. This is because our model is highly focused with a select number of partners that we choose to work with. This allows us to be an active, value-added partner in each situation. Whether working with professional fund investors, corporates or family offices, Ontario Teachers’ looks to take an active role. Our very careful approach to asset and partner selection means a preference for working with aligned investors and management teams where mutual value is placed on one another’s skills, knowledge and expertise.

Our other important stakeholders include members, sponsors and regulators. Last year, Ontario Teachers’ attained the rank of number one globally for member service, and received very high member satisfaction scores. Our team is still looking to build on these strong results, and is actively working to anticipate the future needs of our membership. Ontario Teachers’ will continue to work closely with the plan’s sponsors and regulators to ensure transparency and collaboration, and to bring value to those relationships wherever possible.

Agility, diversity and opportunity

Having a high-functioning team means encouraging agility in our thinking and decision making. The board has decisively supported this goal in many ways. One meaningful development is giving more delegated authority for investment decisions to the executive team. At the same time, we are pushing ourselves to have the right balance between building consensus while still maintaining agile decision making and appropriate accountability. A subset of this will be to evolve more of a “test and learn” culture designed to stimulate innovation.

Developing internal talent is of huge importance, and last year there were 46 promotions to senior positions. Giving employees a great experience means investing in a learning culture and better onboarding programs. Ontario Teachers’ is also investing in mobility that allows our people to gain international experience and develop new skills. The health and performance of the plan depends on finding diverse voices and then ensuring that they are heard. This is a priority in our new recruitment efforts. Ontario Teachers’ has also made significant progress on the diversity of the boards of our private, controlled investee companies. In 2020 and beyond, our focus will include reviewing the retention and progression of our senior women as a measure of the progress that we are making in this regard.

In conclusion

We are fortunate to have a very clear mandate, which is to serve current and retired teachers in the province of Ontario. It provides us with a laser focus in these uncertain times, in which COVID-19 is dramatically impacting the financial markets and all of our activities. We continue to have rigorous processes in place, shaped by robust governance and risk frameworks, and a team dedicated to serving the needs of our members. By sticking to our fundamentals, including strong liquidity, aligned partnerships and excellent talent, I am confident we will continue to deliver on our goals of first-class service and retirement security for our members over the long term.
Equally important, Ziad Hindo, OTPP's CIO, answered questions on page 22 of the Annual Report:
How did Ontario Teachers’ asset classes perform this year?

We saw positive returns across our asset classes in 2019, showing the benefit of a diversified portfolio including a mix of public and private assets. We saw particularly strong returns in equities and fixed income.


Ontario Teachers’ made several investments in technology companies this year – why the increased focus in this area?

Technology is an area with a lot of potential for us. The opportunity set is large, and with the growth of cleantech, artificial intelligence, healthcare and other areas, we expect it to continue to grow in the coming years.

Accordingly, 2019 was a transformational year for Ontario Teachers’. We launched Koru, an incubator that partners with our portfolio companies to create, test and build scalable new digital businesses, and Teachers’ Innovation Platform (TIP), which focuses on late-stage venture and growth equity investments in disruptive technology.

We’ve already seen TIP investments in everything from digital healthcare to space exploration and smart infrastructure, while Koru is generating new ventures in sectors including healthcare, utilities and transportation. It’s great to see how both have hit the ground running.

A low interest rate environment is especially hard on pension funds. How will you continue to make your return targets if rates stay low?

Low interest rates are a reality for all investors – today and for the foreseeable future. Our main defence against low interest rates is solid portfolio construction with a focus on diversification and risk management.It is important to note that we are investing from a position of strength with a funded ratio of 103%, meaning that we can prudently manage through this period without the need for undue aggressiveness.

Our skilled global investing teams are focused on deal origination, execution and strong asset management and value creation, which positions us well to navigate any challenging investment periods.

It has been a tumultuous year around the world, with trade wars intensifying. Is now the time to be investing more outside of Canada?

Being global is more important than ever – it’s an essential element of us being able to meet our long-term investment objectives. We monitor short-term trends and pressures, but our long-term view is that the bulk of future global growth will come from outside of North America, which means we must look abroad for investment opportunities.

Many stakeholders have been vocal about wanting Ontario Teachers’ to do more on climate change. What are you doing in this area to protect the plan’s long-term sustainability?

Climate change is a major area of focus. Our approach has four strategic elements: invest in climate-smart opportunities, integrate climate into our investment process, engage with companies and use our influence to catalyze change.

One example of how we’ve been doing this is our investment in Cubico Sustainable Investments: a global renewable energy platform that invests in wind and solar electricity generation. Since Ontario Teachers’ first invested in Cubico in 2015, the company has grown from 19 facilities located in seven countries to 87 assets in different stages of development located in 12 countries in the Americas, Europe and Australia.

While I’m proud of our progress with portfolio companies such as Cubico, we are not content to stand still. We constantly evolve our practices with the long-term sustainability of the plan in mind.

What is the one thing you would want to tell members about their plan?

We’re operating in a challenging economic environment and many of the challenges we face today are uncharted. How we deal with this uncertainty is by having the right talent, strategy and risk management practices in place, with our focus fixed on achieving the returns needed to ensure that the plan remains sustainable over the long term.
I think very highly of Ziad Hindo, he's an excellent CIO who is very busy these days trying to capitalize on dislocations in public and private markets.

Back to my conversation with Jo Taylor. I began by telling him I noticed that Teachers' rejigged its asset mix at the end of 2019 and increased its allocation to Bonds from 31% to 36%.

Jo told me they were waiting for a correction and positioned the portfolio more defensively, allocating more to fixed income, gold, defensive strategies and tail hedges.

He told me they were "able to ride out some of the storm" but obviously didn't predict a pandemic.

Still, he stressed the plan has a long-term focus, looking to generate 6.5% nominal over many years and their $6.5  billion surplus and cautious discount rate allows them to have the reserves to buffer this crisis. "We are fortunate to have these reserves".

But its the plan's long-term focus that will allow them to navigate these uncertain times.

Jo told me beyond money, Ontario Teachers' is providing its portfolio companies better information and guidance on best principles to deal with this crisis, real meaningful value added.

I asked him about how this COVID-19 crisis will impact Teachers' private market assets, specifically some sectors in commercial real estate (retail malls) and infrastructure like airports and toll roads.

He told me the way governments have responded means some assets will get hit this year but the extent of the virus and its long-term effects remain to be seen. "Longer term, these remain great assets".

He said Teachers' has 110 portfolio companies internationally across real estate, private equity, high conviction equity, and infrastructure and right now they are prioritizing liquidity and have conducted enough stress tests to meet all their liquidity needs.

And these liquidity needs go "above and beyond" capital calls from their private equity partners, which they had planned for, "it's about ensuring we are there to provide our portfolio companies any liquidity they need to ride out this storm".

I told Jo that when I went over HOOPP's 2019 results, retiring CEO Jim Keohane told me that as long bond yields approach zero, they need to plan ahead and look elsewhere as to where to invest because HOOPP won't invest in negative-yielding bonds.

Without going into specifics, he told me "there's been a lot of volatility in long bond yields" and they are taking a "granular approach" to deal with the shock and find suitable opportunities that will deliver their long-term results with less risk. "We need to manage that volatility very carefully," he said.

In terms of how Teachers' is coping with the COVID-19 crisis, he said he was very pleased with their technological capabilities, stating 98% of the staff are working remotely and business is continuing, the focus is on executing on their strategies.

He said that most of the disruption happened in Toronto where their support staff is located because their international offices are made up of investment professionals that are used to working remotely.

He was very happy with Teachers' member services, singling out Tracy Abel and her team who are responsible for overseeing the personalized service to Ontario Teachers' 329,000 working and retired members as well as for the Member Services division's Actuarial, Tax and Accounts Receivable Services; Employer Information Services and Strategic Initiatives.

"Tracy is great, she took over from Rosemarie McClean (who is now head of the UN Pension Fund) and she has done a wonderful job. She's calm and has an IT background which has proved very useful."

I asked Jo if Teachers' has reached out to its members during this crisis given that many of their retired members are elderly and particularly vulnerable to this virus (Teachers' has the oldest members among Canada's large pension plans).

Jo told me they have reached out and gotten 60% response stating their members are very happy with their service but he admitted "right now, they are rightly preoccupied with what is going on."

I also asked him how he is leading the organization given this new reality and remote working.

He told me they are focusing a lot on "communication" and everyone from senior managers on are expected to clearly communicate what needs to be done.

As for how he's coping personally, he told me he has been an investor for a long time, seen his fair of challenging times. "You need to be calm, give good direction, plan for the future, make sure members are well served and above all, ensure your employees are safe, informed and engaged."

I couldn't agree more. I told him that in a recent comment of mine I stated that Canada's top ten pensions are in a good position to weather this storm, even if they will all get hit.

He agreed and said that Canada's large pensions play a meaningful role in the Canadian financial landscape, providing much needed stability.

And since I am transparent about compensation, here is a summary of executive compensation for 2019:


As always, please read the detailed discussion on compensation starting on page 48 of the 2019 Annual Report.

I did ask Jo how Ron Mock is doing and he told me "he's fine, in Toronto at home" (I'm glad he's not in Italy).

I ended by asking Jo if he will be doing a lot more public interviews so I can embed them in my blog. He told me he hears me loud and clear and that he's working on it.

Once again, I thank Jo Taylor for taking the time to talk to me. I also told him that if he can deal with this crisis, he will be able to deal with any crisis that comes his way.

Lastly, OTPP believes that companies with good environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices do more than just earn returns. They contribute to a vibrant future for themselves, for their plan, and for many generations to come, which is why they apply their Responsible Investing principles every day. Their 2019 Responsible Investing Report is now available here.

Also, take the time to read OTPP's 2019 Annual Report, it's extremely detailed and very well written.

Below, highlights from OTPP's 2019 annual results. "We Lead. We Learn. We Last" is their corporate motto and it's very fitting.

Second, Michael Vogelzang, CapTrust principal and chief investment strategist, joins'Power Lunch' to discuss what he thinks is next for markets following the coronavirus pandemic.

And CNBC's "Halftime Report" team is joined by Marc Lasry of Avenue Capital to discuss his investment strategy.

Lastly, watch as President Trump and the coronavirus task force give an update on the response effort from the White House. Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci are superb, listen carefully to their comments (fast forward to minute 15).



CDPQ Injects $4 Billion Into Quebec's Economy

$
0
0
Daniel J. Rowe of CTV News reports the Caisse de depot offers $4 billion for businesses affected by COVID-19 crisis:
The Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec (CDPQ) is stepping up with some cash to help Quebec companies that have been impacted by the COVID-19 crisis.

The CDPQ is offering $4 billion for companies in the province and giving an additional $300,000 as a philanthropic and community donation.



“This support is intended to complement the various initiatives that other financial institutions, Quebec institutional investors and the governments of Quebec and Canada have announced,” reads a Monday news release from the CDPQ.

Companies must have been profitable before the COVID-19 outbreak and shut down all non-essential business, have a promising growth outlook, and be seeking financing of over $5 million, according to the release.

The company is also freezing all leaders’ salaries for 2020, and postponing compensation for CDPQ leaders to the third quarter.

“The envelope announced today, and the personalized advice that our teams provide to portfolio companies, represent important contributions to Quebec's economy in these difficult but temporary circumstances,” said Caisse president and CEO Charles Emond.

Those companies wanting to request funds can do so at the CPDQ website.

The $300,000 donation will be split between the following organizations:
  • Centraide of Greater Montreal's Emergency Fund, dedicated to the most vulnerable people;
  • Canadian Red Cross, for its community support services;
  • Little Brothers, who especially work with the elderly in need;
  • Tel-jeunes, which supports young people and parents with free and confidential professional counselling services;
  • Alloprof, which provides valuable educational support services for parents.
Let's go over the press release CDPQ put out on Monday:
With the world facing an unprecedented crisis related to COVID-19, Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ) joins the collective effort with the announcement of various initiatives.

An envelope dedicated to Québec companies

As an investor, CDPQ is creating a $4-billion envelope to support Québec companies temporarily impacted by COVID-19. This support is intended to complement the various initiatives that other financial institutions, Québec institutional investors and the governments of Québec and Canada have announced.

The funds will be used to address the specific liquidity needs of companies, whether or not in CDPQ’s portfolio, that meet certain criteria, including having been profitable before the COVID-19 crisis, having a promising growth outlook in their sector and seeking financing of over $5 million. Eligible companies will be able to use these investments to weather this turbulent period until the economy recovers and support and advance their recovery plans once the crisis is over.

In addition, as it does every day with its portfolio companies, CDPQ will continue to deploy the financial and operational expertise of its teams to help the selected companies in developing innovative and structuring financial solutions. These solutions could include various financial instruments based on companies’ needs in the current conditions.
It’s essential for CDPQ to join the collective effort during the COVID-19 crisis. The envelope announced today, and the personalized advice that our teams provide to portfolio companies, represent important contributions to Québec’s economy in these difficult but temporary circumstances. This initiative is a good example of our two-fold mission to meet the needs of our depositors and support Québec’s companies and economy,” said Charles Emond, President and Chief Executive Officer of CDPQ.
Companies that wish to request financing are invited to fill out the form at www.cdpq.com/en/form-covid-19. After CDPQ receives the form, companies will quickly be contacted by telephone to obtain further information and assess the request.

In addition, all CDPQ teams, in Québec and around the world, are currently mobilized and continue to manage Quebecers savings with rigour in these unique times.
“The world and the markets are facing a major health and economic crisis. We’re closely monitoring our portfolio and the various asset classes through the COVID-19 crisis. As a long-term investor, we have built a diversified portfolio that is designed to generate returns that meet our depositors’ needs over the long term. While not immune to the economic consequences of this historic pandemic, CDPQ is solidly positioned, even after what happened in recent weeks on the markets, as we have the liquidity necessary to weather the current storm and what may come in the future. We have a fair amount of flexibility; we are able to clearly identify risks, and therefore take cautious and progressive action when the time is right to seize the opportunities that such conditions may have to offer,” added Mr. Emond.
Philanthropic and community donation

CDPQ also wishes to support the numerous organizations that directly address the basic needs of the most vulnerable people, as these organizations are currently facing significant challenges. To provide support and help them maintain essential services or expand their reach, CDPQ is donating $300,000, to be divided among five organizations:
  • Centraide of Greater Montreal’s Emergency Fund, dedicated to the most vulnerable people;
  • Canadian Red Cross, for its Community Support Services;
  • Little Brothers, who especially work with the elderly in need;
  • Tel-jeunes, which supports young people and parents with free and confidential professional counselling services;
  • Alloprof, which provides valuable educational support services for parents.
Salary freeze and postponed variable compensation

Given current economic conditions, CDPQ has decided to freeze the salaries of all leaders in the organization and its subsidiaries.

The payment of variable compensation to CDPQ leaders for 2019, which takes into account the solid results of the last five years and forms part of their total compensation, as is standard in the financial industry, will be postponed until the third quarter of 2020. This measure also applies to our subsidiaries’ leaders.

In addition, the members of the Executive Committee have decided to postpone and co-invest the maximum variable compensation possible for a period of three years, i.e. until 2022, as of January 1, 2020. These postponed amounts will rise and fall in tandem with CDPQ’s returns, clearly demonstrating their trust and commitment to executing the organization’s mission and their full solidarity with what our depositors are experiencing in these extraordinary times.

ABOUT CAISSE DE DÉPÔT ET PLACEMENT DU QUÉBEC

Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ) is a long-term institutional investor that manages funds primarily for public and parapublic pension and insurance plans. As at December 31, 2019, it held CAD 340.1 billion in net assets. As one of the largest pension fund in Canada, CDPQ invests globally in financial markets, private equity, infrastructure, real estate and private debt. For more information, visit cdpq.com, follow us on Twitter @LaCDPQ or consult our Facebook or LinkedIn pages.
Let me begin by stating CDPQ is in a unique postion with its dual mandate to support Quebec's economy and focus on maximizing returns without taking undue risks.

The announced measures are absolutely right in every respect, including the salary freezes, bonus delays and delays of variable compensation for executive leaders.

When times are tough and millions of people are losing their job through no fault of their own, you lead by example, and I think the Caisse is leading by example.

I remember in 2009, I went to Ottawa and testified in front of a Parliamentary committee and stated it was absolutely ridiculous that large Canadian pensions doled out huge compensation and bonuses right after the 2008 crisis.

I know the formula well, compensation is based on long-term results, but let me also state it's terrible optics and it shows a complete disregard of what is going on out there if you're doling out multi millions to executive leaders in this environment.

And that doesn't just go for big pensions, it also applies to big banks and other organizations, show some humility, respect and compassion for the people suffering right now (ie. don't be greedy arrogant jerks looking to score a big bonus when a depression is hitting us!).

As far as injecting $4 billion to support its portfolio companies and other Quebec companies that are experiencing difficulties because of this COVID-19 crisis, I think that is not only part of CDPQ's mandate, it's also the right thing to do during this challenging time.

The government of Canada and the Quebec government have implemented their measures but CDPQ can offer a lot more than money, it has operational and financial expertise to help its Quebec portfolio companies navigate this storm.

Did Quebec Premier François Legault talk to Charles Emond and is his government behind these measures? I have no doubt the two men talk but CDPQ is an independent organization and it has a clear dual mandate and acted upon it.

Will CDPQ escape the carnage from COVID-19? No, it won't. All of Canada's top ten pensions will get hit but unlike their US counterparts, they are all in a good position to ride out this storm.

Almost all of Canada's large pensions were positioned defensively coming into this year, nobody could have predicted this pandemic (but some of us saw big trouble in late January, noting that asymptomatic transmission would be a game changer for this novel coronavirus, and it was!).

Anyway, CDPQ's public and private market assets will get hit. Its real estate subsidiary, Ivanhoé Cambridge, has well publicized problems with its retail portfolio and I expect it to take further writedowns in its retail portfolio this year (as will other large pensions).

Some of its infrastructure assets (airports, toll roads) will also suffer losses, just like everyone else, and its massive Quebec portfolio will get hit, which is why it's stepping up efforts to provide much needed liquidity to profitable companies that are experiencing difficulties.

Still, Charles Emond, its new CEO, was on television earlier this year stating there was no profit growth supporting the big move in stocks, and he was absolutely right.

He knew the moves were unsustainable as did everyone else at CDPQ which tells me they were also positioned more defensively and that helped them absorb some of the losses in Q1 (some, not all, they will be hit).

Lastly, Quebec now has 4,611 COVID-19 cases, almost half of all the cases in Canada (we are testing more and our spring break was a week before Ontario’s, before the borders were shut), but Premier François Legault shared some good news today:
In Premier François Legault's public briefing on the coronavirus situation in Quebec as of April 1, he announced what the government has done in the past few weeks and will continue to do in upcoming weeks. Legault said that he has asked Quebec health officials to release, as soon as possible, the most probable scenario for what Quebec will be seeing in relation to COVID-19 in upcoming weeks. And, he announced that, as we reach the first day of April 2020, the most recent confirmed number of cases of COVID-19 in Quebec is now a total of 4,611.

The good news of the day is that there have been no additional people put into intensive care since March 31.

Among other good news, Legault shared with us that the province has managed to free 6,000 beds for anyone who gets hospitalized due to the novel coronavirus. Although he believes we will not need this many. Legault reassured us that we are prepared for this fight, but that we cannot give up.

He reminded us that Quebec is one of the places that test the most for COVID-19 in the world.

Legault also stressed that under no circumstance should you go visit anyone older than 70 for the time being. "It is a matter of life and death," Legault said.
Let me just say Premier François Legault and his health minister, Dr. Horacio Arruda, have done and are doing an excellent job, communicating and just being great leaders throughout this crisis.

During today's briefing, Dr. Arruda reminded all Quebecers that just because we will reach a peak soon, it doesn't mean you can relax and stop social distancing. He said if people do that, the curve will steepen fast and we will get into big trouble.

That's very important to remember because a lot of idiots will (wrongly) think that once a peak is reached, it's time to ignore public health measures and start partying again.

Importantly, this virus is going away any time soon, we need to prepare now for a second wave come this fall and we need to be extra vigilant until proven treatments and a vaccine become widely available. We aren't there yet and the next month will be a very diffcult one, especially in hard hit New York.

Below, Quebec Premier François Legault, Health Minister Dr. Horacio Arruda and Health and Social Services Minister Danielle McCann brief Quebec's population on the latest developments on COVID-19 (in French and English; my wife and I watch it every day at 1:00 p.m. sharp).

And stocks sank on Wednesday as Wall Street kicked off the second quarter on a sour note amid concerns the coronavirus will keep the economy shut down longer than expected.

Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor at Allianz, joins"Squawk Box" to discuss the markets as investors prepare for the first day of trading of the second quarter. He talks about the looming liquidity issue companies are facing because of coronavirus pandemic.

US Pensions Take Big Coronavirus Hit

$
0
0
Aaron Brown, a former managing director and head of financial market research at AQR Capital Management and author of The Poker Face of Wall Street wrote a Bloomberg op-ed on how US pension funds will take a big coronavirus hit:
The coronavirus crisis is still unfolding, but it’s not too soon to think about lasting financial impact and how to limit the fallout. One major financial crisis that may hit later this year or early in 2021 is the ever-looming collapse in state and local employee pension funds. Although the problem has been growing for decades, the virus may have been the event that pushed it over the edge.

Declines in the financial markets may have cost the funds as much as $1 trillionin assets, or about 25% of their total, according to Moody’s Investors Service. That would bring the aggregate funding ratio—value of assets divided by actuarial value of liabilities—from 52% based on the last report by the Census Bureau down to perhaps 37%. Markets may recover, of course, but they may not. The latest aggregate numbers we have are from 2017, and for most individual funds data is available only as of mid-2018. Asset returns are usually smoothed so it could be four or five years until the full effect of the virus is reported officially.

But it’s not aggregate numbers or official reports that will trigger a crisis. It’s the big funds in the worst shape. My back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest Connecticut could be looking at a 28% funded percentage if the numbers were available now, Kentucky 25%, New Jersey 24% and Illinois 20%.

Those figures rely on optimistic assumptions about healthcare cost increases and discount rates; the true numbers are probably worse. The important statistic is more objective: how many years’ benefits do the pension assets represent? That could be no more than about four years in Illinois if true numbers were public today, five in New Jersey and Kentucky, six in Connecticut.

All benefits for active employees, plus all benefits for everyone in the near future, will have to come from employee or state contributions. But states will be strapped for cash, and looking to cut contributions, not raise them. Employees will be unwilling to contribute more since there’s little likelihood they’ll ever see that money again, especially as post-2008 reforms have denied many of them the gold-plated benefits that employees with more seniority enjoy.

Taxpayers? The least willing of the bunch. Creditors? The states need to keep borrowing money, so they have to appease creditors. Some of the money will come via defaults or restructuring of state and local debts, but this is its own crisis, and it won’t fill the gap. The federal government? Maybe, but not for full payments. A more likely scenario would be absorbing retirees into Social Security and Medicare at sharply reduced benefit levels—and those programs face similar problems as state and local plans.

It’s true that 48 states have constitutional or other legal protections for pension benefits. These will improve union bargaining power, but it won’t squeeze anywhere near the full amounts promised. Courts will both unwilling and unable to force governments to hand over money the governments don’t have and can’t get.

Will deaths tied to the Covid-19 pandemic save the day? After all, deaths will likely be concentrated among retired employees getting benefits rather than active employees paying contributions. Moreover, active employees who succumb to the virus will be replaced. If we exclude Hollywood disaster scenarios, the highest projections are U.S. death rates doubling in 2020 and remaining 2.5% higher thereafter. Using the age distribution of coronavirus deaths for which information is available, that could cause liabilities to fall by about half the amount that assets fell. But in that scenario assets would probably fall much farther. It’s hard to come up with a scenario in which additional coronavirus deaths improve pension funded ratios.

Will these events trigger Illinois or some other state to default? It’s plausible. Will that cause other states and municipalities to follow? That’s likely, mainly because creditors will stop lending to states with big unfunded pension liabilities. Will that provide the cover for every state except maybe Utah and Wisconsin from seizing the opportunity to renege on promises? I’d bet on that as well.

What we do today is start treating pensions as an issue that must be addressed rather than a can to be kicked down the road. Admit that promises to employees will not be kept, and start figuring out how to direct the cuts to where they will do the least harm: younger workers with more time to prepare and richer workers with more ability to pay. Collecting the maximum contributions possible, but in realistic forms employees can count on rather than unreliable promises about future. Releasing timely and complete data on assets and cash flows.

The basic terms of the fix are obvious. Pension payments will be capped, probably at something like the Social Security maximum of $3,011 per month for someone who retires at age 65. Tax the benefits, again probably like the rules for Social Security (50% of benefits for single filers with total income between $25,000 and $34,000, 85% of benefits for higher income individuals). Make healthcare plans more Medicare-like, with lower provider payments. Employee contributions to be directed either to Social Security/Medicare or individual retirement accounts rather than underwriting payments to retired workers.

This will provoke fierce fights. First to accept the inevitable and second to set the precise terms. How will police officers be treated versus teachers versus Division of Motor Vehicle clerks? Will all state and local plans be put in one bucket, or will employees from more prudent states do better than employees from profligate ones? How will scarce funds be directed to pensions versus health benefits? How much will taxpayers and creditors kick in? These fights will take place in legislatures, courtrooms and union elections. It won’t be pretty or fun. But the sooner we admit the problem and start to solve it, the sooner it’s behind us.
James Comtois of Pensions & Investments also reports on how public plans to face major losses in fiscal 2020, according to Moody's:
U.S. public pension plans are facing investment losses approaching $1 trillion because of the economic fallout from the coronavirus, according to a report from Moody's Investors Service.

The losses could exacerbate the pension liability challenges that many state and local governments are already facing. Plus, the economic setback is reducing revenue levels and threatening the ability of municipal governments to afford these higher pension costs.

U.S. public plans are generally on pace for an average investment loss of about 21% for the fiscal year ending June 30, Moody's estimates.

"Without a dramatic bounce back of investment markets, 2020 pension investment losses will mark a significant turning point where the downside exposure of some state and local governments' credit quality to pension risk comes to fruition because of already heightened liabilities and lower capacity to defer costs," said Tom Aaron, vice president at Moody's, in a news release announcing the report.

"The credit impact from 2020 pension investment losses will depend on many factors, including the ultimate magnitude of asset declines, the unique funding and cash flow position of governments' pension systems, and their ability to absorb cost hikes in their budgets while continuing to provide services and pay debt service," Mr. Aaron added.

Reflecting an annual investment return target in the range of 6% to 7.5%, plan assets are heavily allocated to equities and alternatives.

Falling market interest rates are also increasing adjusted net pension liabilities. On average, adjusted net pension liabilities are generally on pace to rise by nearly 50%. Investment losses are pushing down the value of pension assets and falling interest rates are pushing up adjusted net pension liabilities further by causing the market value of total pension liabilities to rise, the report said.

If steep investment losses are not reversed, the annual costs that governments face to keep up with their unfunded liabilities will spike, the report stated. The cost for governments to make the minimum contributions required to prevent unfunded liabilities from growing is likely to rise nearly 60% in fiscal 2021. If governments' revenue performance also deteriorates, then pension affordability ratios will get significantly worse for some plans due to the combination of increased costs and decreased revenue.

Moody's based its estimates on a sample of 56 large U.S. public pension plans.
On Monday, I discussed the next retirement crisis and shared an email a former senior pension fund manager sent me after reading my recent comment on whether Canada's top ten pensions are in trouble, sharing this:
I think that the big Canadian pension plans will be fine, they are well managed and came into this situation in very good financial shape. However this is going to be a disaster for US states and municipal plans. It was just a matter of time for many of them as their pension plans were so poorly funded, even when using completely unrealistic return expectation. 

Now these governments are having to pile on debt to bail out their economies. This may give them political cover to break their pension promises.

One thing that could hurt Canadian pension plans is longer term effects of the coronavirus on the assets they own. Two things come to mind - real estate and some types of infrastructure. This crisis may just hasten the demise of the retail sector and commercial office space. For example, OTPP owns about 17% of Macerich which is a publicly traded US REIT. It is down 92% from the end of 2015. The office sector has been booming in some parts of Canada but that may change if companies decide to take less space in the future as they find that employees can work efficiently from home.

Airports and toll roads are taking a HUGE hit in the short term. Will traffic volumes come all the way back? Did anyone do a worst case scenario for Hwy 407 that saw traffic down 90% for a month or more? These assets may need equity injections to stay viable, and their long term valuations may shrink as globablization reverses and the flight volumes at airports decreases.

I also think that long term equity markets will do less well due to (1) lower long term earnings, and (2) lower P/E multiples. Taxes are going to have to go up to pay for these bailouts and that will have to come from somewhere. Companies, and society, will now focus more on resiliency than efficiency which will hurt profits. Will the Eurozone survive this crisis? And this crisis is showing us that there are a lot of unseen risks in the world and you can't be pricing markets for perfection at a 20 P/E multiple. That just won't work over the long run.

The other risk that I am worried about in the long term is inflation. How are governments going to pay back all of the debt being issued? Do they inflate their way out of this problem?

I have more questions than answers but I think the future will look very different than the last 25 years, and I think we are going back to valuation ratios that we saw from 1880-1995 rather than what we have seen for the last 25 years. And note that we are STILL at high ratios in the US - to get to a P/E10 ratio of 10 markets have to fall by another 50%+. I don't think that will happen but I don't think we are going to see a snap back to an S&P500 of 3300 any time soon.


If you haven't already heard this I suggest you listen to this Recode/Decode podcast featuring Chamath Palihapitiya from last week (click here or here to listen to it).
Again, this person is extremely knowledgeable, has tremendous experience and he is providing my readers with excellent food for thought.

CalPERS recently disclosed it lost about $67 billion in market value since January as the coronavirus pandemic roiled global financial markets.

But when it comes to US public pensions, I worry a lot more about chronically underfunded state and municipal plans that will be unable to meet their pension obligations.

Keep in mind, pensions are all about managing assets and liabilities. The perfect storm is when assets get clobbered and liabilities explode as long bond rates approach zero (like now). It's actually the drop in rates which causes many pensions to sink further and further into underfunded territory, and even when assets recover, as long as rates stay ultra low, pensions remain in big trouble.

A long time ago, Jim Leech, the former CEO of Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan and author of The Third Rail, told me something I never forgot: "Pension deficits are path dependent," meaning the starting point matters a lot.

If you're starting point is 69 or 70% funded status like a CalPERS or CalSTRS, you will get hit hard but won't succumb to pension hell.

If, on the other hand, your funded status is 30% or less like Kentucky, Illinois, and many municipal plans, you're pretty much screwed because there is no realistic way you will climb out of that pension hole.

Jim Leech was recently interviewed on Real Vision. The entire interview is available here for subscribers but I provide below two clips which were posted on Twitter:





Notice what he says about the governance of US public pensions where there is "undue political pressure".

The governance at Canada's large public pensions is a big reason why they are successful. There is zero (or extremely limited) political interference, our pensions focus exclusively on how to invest over the long run in the best interests of their members and beneficiaries.

What else? Canada's large public pensions use much lower discount rates to mark their liabilities, use leverage intelligently, and they share the costs of the plan equally among sponsors and members (typically by adopting conditional inflation protection).

This is why Canada's large public pensions were fully funded (or overfunded) going into this coranavirus crisis and they are in a better position to ride out this storm (they will all get hit but are in better shape to come out ahead).

In the US, I have openly been worried about the next retirement crisis and its ripple effects on the economy and society.

Real Vision recently did a short documentary called Reversal of Fortune: Inside Pensions and the Erosion of Retirement, featuring yours truly, Jim Leech, Ed Siedle, Teresa Ghilarducci, Roger Lowenstein and others.

You can watch it here (subscription required). Below, a tweet which features the trailer:



I feel for that teacher who saw his benefits slashed.

At the end of that trailer, I said the ripple effects of the US public pension crisis will be felt everywhere and it "will affect everyone in material ways".

Here is exactly what I said at the end of the documentary:
"It can be anything from paving roads to other services, and that will have effects on everyone. When you run out of all options, the only other option is to go to Uncle Sam and say, hey, we need a massive bailout on our pension system. We can't do anything about it, and we're contractually obligated to meet those pension payments. It will bail these pensions out not because they're particularly worried about pensions and retirees, they will bail them out because they want to bail out Wall Street, private equity funds and hedge funds and make sure that they get money in perpetuity over the long run so that they can grow richer and richer and pay these politicians more and more money for their campaigns. I am being cynical, but that's the reality of the situation, but notice, they will never change anything structurally."
It's really important to remember all bailouts are typically done with a single purpose of keeping the financial system afloat so elite capitalists can keep prospering.

The same goes for these "rescue packages" governments are doing now in response to the pandemic. The money isn't going directly to banks (for political reasons) but once people get it, they will pay the mortgage, pay down their credit cards, car leases, student loans, and rent. So, in effect, it's a dead (indirect) giveaway to big banks.

This is why I keep telling people, if things really get bad and many US public pensions become insolvent, they will be bailed out but the real reason will be to bail out Wall Street (big banks and their big hedge fund and private equity clients), not to bail out Main Street.

Lastly, while some people think we are heading for a pensions apartheid, I worry we are heading into something a lot more painful, a complete pension and social albatross:





On that grim note, stay safe everyone, it's going to be a long, tough slug ahead, we need to prepare for a long war against this virus (and I mean mentally and physically prepare not just for the virus and the tragic deaths but also for the economic fallout which will likely linger long after the virus is vanquished).

Below, Jim Keohane who just retired from HOOPP, spoke to Real Vision's Ed Harrison in February and explained why once pensions get to a certain level of "underfunded-ness" (60-70% funded), it’s extremely hard to dig out of the hole, because they have to earn way more just to catch up.

Many underfunded and chronically underfunded US public pensions are about to find out exactly what Jim Keohane is explaining in this clip. Unfortunately, for most of them, it's already too late.

And Jim Chanos, Kynikos Associates founder, joins'Fast Money Halftime Report' to discuss how to watch the stocks amid the coronavirus pandemic, how the gig economy will not scrape by unharmed from the outbreak and some of his stock picks. Listen to Chanos, he offers incredible insights.


The Coronavirus Depression?

$
0
0
Fred Imbert, Silvia Amaro and Thomas Franck report the Dow drops more than 300 points to close out another wild week on Wall Street:
Stocks fell on Friday to end another volatile week of trading, pressured by a spike in coronavirus-related deaths in New York while investors digested a dismal U.S. jobs report.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average slid 360.91 points, or 1.7%, to 21,052.53. The S&P 500 dropped 1.5% to 2,488.65. The Nasdaq Composite also pulled back 1.5% to close at 7,373.08.

Wall Street posted its third weekly decline in four. The Dow lost 2.7% this week while the S&P 500 fell 2.1%. The Nasdaq ended the week down 1.7%.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said deaths in the state rose by 562 in 24 hours to more than 2,900 for the biggest increase to date. Cuomo added the curve of confirmed cases “continues to go up,” noting there are now over 100,000 cases in New York state.


“This still feels like something we’re heading into, not heading out of,” said Brian Nick, chief investment strategist at Nuveen. “We can see the light behind us, but not ahead of us.”

“The upside scenario is disappearing very quickly and the base case is getting worse,” said Nick.

There have been more than 261,000 confirmed infections in the United States and more than 6,600 deaths from COVID-19, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. Globally, more than 1 million cases have been confirmed.

Massive job losses in the US

U.S. payrolls fell by 701,000 in March, marking the worst jobs report since 2009, while the unemployment rate jumped to 4.4%. However, the report failed to capture the full extent of the ongoing economic blow from the coronavirus outbreak. On Thursday, the Labor Department said jobless claims jumped by a record of 6.6 million for the week of March 27.


“Today’s nonfarm payrolls data confirms what we’ve already known: the U.S. economy was doing well before COVID-19′s impact was felt, and COVID-19′s impact has been severe,” said Lauren Goodwin, multi-asset portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments. “Job losses will continue to surge as the national shutdown strengthens its hold on the U.S. economy.”

American Express, UnitedHealth and IBM fell more than 3% each to lead the Dow lower. Some of those losses were offset by Walmart, which turned around to close 0.7% higher after a report said the company’s sales have jumped 20% in the past month. Utilities and financials led the S&P 500 lower, falling 3.6% and 2.3%, respectively.

Stocks got a slight boost earlier in the day as oil rose 12%, adding to its biggest one-day rally on record. West Texas Intermediate futures soared 24% on Thursday for their best day ever, lifting the major stock indexes. The Dow and S&P 500 gained more than 2% on Thursday.

“Trends have now been sideways for US and European equities for the last seven trading sessions, despite the massive swings,” said Mark Newton, managing member at Newton Advisors, in a note. “Gains have consolidated, but have not given way to much weakness that is sufficient to expect an immediate test of low.”

Both the Dow and S&P 500 remain more than 26% below their respective all-time highs set in February as jitters over the spread of COVID-19 foster volatile trading on Wall Street.
Sinéad Carew of Reuters also reports that Wall Street falls as coronavirus cuts into U.S. payrolls:
Wall Street’s main indexes fell on Friday as the coronavirus abruptly ended a record U.S. job growth streak of 113 months, leaving little doubt that the economy is in a recession.

And even the loss of 701,000 jobs that Labor Department data showed for March did not completely capture the economic carnage. The survey considered data only until mid-March, before widespread U.S. lockdowns put more people out of work.

The worldwide spread of the virus has forced billions of people to stay indoors and pushed entire sectors to the brink of collapse, triggering mass layoffs and dramatic steps by companies to raise cash.

While relatively flat volatility indexes suggested that investors getting used to market swings, Mike Turvey, TD Ameritrade’s institutional senior trading strategist sees institutional investors taking a shorter term view with many still very cautious ahead of the weekend market close.

“This is not like December 2018. We’re not likely to see a V shaped recovery because we haven’t even begun to really tackle the main issue behind why this is happening. That’s still an ongoing process. It’s going to take time,” said Turvey.

“Everybody’s outlook has changed to very short term. The reality is that a lot of things happen over the weekend and a lot of people don’t want that exposure.”

The S&P 500 was down about 27% from its mid-February record high, or over $7 trillion in market value, and economists have cut their forecasts for U.S. GDP, with Morgan Stanley now predicting a 38% contraction in the second quarter.

At 3:00PM ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 365.26 points, or 1.71%, to 21,048.18, the S&P 500 lost 43.38 points, or 1.72%, to 2,483.52 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 135.09 points, or 1.8%, to 7,352.22.

However the CBOE market volatility index , also known as Wall Street’s fear gauge fell 1.9 points. And while the small cap Russell 2000 index was down 4% on the day the Russell volatility index was essentially flat on the day.

“You have to interpret it as a small positive. You don’t see the same reach for protection,” said TD Ameritrade’s Turvey. “The market is accepting the fact we’re going to have these 3-4% swings on a regular basis.”

Of the S&P 500’s 11 major sectors utilities and financials were the biggest laggards with declines of more than 3%.

Walt Disney Co shares fell 3% after it said it would furlough some U.S. employees this month, while sources said luxury retailer Neiman Marcus was stepping up preparations to seek bankruptcy protection.

Analysts expect corporate profits to fall in the upcoming earnings season, but some strategists said that actual numbers will likely be given little importance.

“There’s really very little that you can take away from (earnings) other than some insights to actually how are these businesses set up to weather the pandemic and where will they be once it begins to show signs of passing,” Robert Pavlik, chief investment strategist at SlateStone Wealth LLC in New York.

Raytheon Technologies Corp, formed by the merger of United Technologies and Raytheon Co, shed 10.2% as it pulled its 2020 outlook for its aerospace units.
Alright, it's Friday and it was another dismal week on the health and economic front:

















The most important thing this week is that coranavirus is slamming the US economy and the worst is yet to come:
The government’s survey of establishments painted a grim picture of the U.S. employment situation through early March, but its poll of households was far worse.

The household survey, which asks individual residents how many people are working there, showed a stunning drop of 2,987,000 workers for the month.

That compares with the nonfarm payrolls decline of 701,000 reported in the establishment survey and gives another perspective to just how bad the situation has gotten since the economy has all but shut down to protect against the coronavirus spread.

When releasing its headline nonfarm payroll numbers, the government focuses on the establishment survey as it captures a larger sample size and is considered less volatile than the household count. The establishment survey captures about 145,000 businesses and work sites, while its counterpart focuses on 60,000 eligible households and includes agricultural workers.

Both use the week up to the 12th of the month for sampling, which in this case was before the worst of the job losses began.

The Labor Department uses the household survey to calculate the headline unemployment rate, which jumped from 3.5% to 4.4%.

In the March survey, the household survey’s numbers are stunning.

They show a decline of employment from 158,759,000 in February to 155,772,000 in March. That came amid a drop of 1.6 million in the civilian labor force and a 1.1 percentage point tumble in the employment-population ratio to 60%. The labor force participation rate contracted 0.7 percentage point to 62.7%. Those counted as not in the labor force rose nearly 1.8 million to 96.8 million.

Other numbers showed a 1.2 million increase in job losers or those who completed temporary jobs. Those unemployed for less than five weeks surged by 1.5 million while those at work part time for economic reasons jumped by more than 1.4 million.
Given the massive job losses, it's hardly surprising some are warning to brace for the biggest recession ever and others are warning stocks have further to fall to new coronavirus lows:







Just how bad are things in the US right now? I think this says it all:



Small businesses are starving for cash to stay afloat, many of the people they laid off are counting on them but even when they open, they won't be hiring everyone back until the economy picks up again.

We need to be realistic about what is going on, it's unprecedented economic destruction at a very rapid rate and there will be lingering economic effects.

Importantly, when times are bad, businesses respond immediately and cut, but when times are good, they take their time hiring people because they're uncertain and want to make sure the recovery is solid.

If the US economy can't escape a recession or worse, falls into a depression, what does that mean for stocks?

Well, it means we are going to be in for a bear market and that means two things:
  • Economists will take center stage again, not cheerleading Wall Street analysts/ strategists. 
  • Earnings visibility will be the name of the game, not conjured up earnings, real earnings.
Those of you who have never lived through a nasty bear market, let me sum it up for you: it's Chinese water torture.

Are we going to a bear market? No doubt about it, we just have no idea how bad and how long it will last. How low will stocks go? Nobody really knows but some think a lot lower.

Veteran markets strategist James McDonald, CEO of Hercules Investments, continues to see downside risk to the Dow Jones Industrial Average to 15,000 from its current perch just above 21,000:
He thinks the economy could begin to show signs of life in the fourth quarter of this year — but until that starts to show up somewhere in the markets or economic data, he prefers putting on trades that profit from extreme volatility and downside.

Yahoo Finance highlights a call such as this because, well, McDonald has been dead right so far. Moreover, April has lived up to its billing in the early going as potentially lethal to stocks because of dreadful economic data nobody on Wall Street has ever seen before.



Also, if history is any guide, the relationship between earnings and the stock market will dictate just how bad this bear market will be:



When I look at the 5-year weekly chart of the S&P 500 ETF (SPY),  I see it can't break above its 200-week moving average and that tells me we are definitely at the begining of a bear market and headed lower:


Just how low, again nobody knows but I do warn you, just because the VIX index isn't making a new high, it doesn't mean stocks can't go lower over the coming weeks/ months.

Back in 2008, the VIX peaked in October 2008 and stocks made their ultimate low five months later in March 2009.

True, we have unprecedented global monetary and fiscal stimulus but when you look at unemployment skyrocketing in the US and all over the world, that doesn't provide much solace.

Anyway, I agree with those who think equities are taking a stroll through Wonderland, awaiting "herd immunity":



At one point, reality will settle in and it won't be pretty, so be prepared for a long tough slug ahead. If you don't believe me, believe this guy:



That doesn't mean there won't be tradeable opportunities, there will be like this week as oil stocks like Apache (APA) and Occidental Petroleum (OXY) surged along with oil prices, but I warn you, these are nothing more than bear market rallies.

How do I know this? I've been around long enough to tell you that this isn't the time to get excited about stocks, especially stocks that are popping from the abyss.

For the week, Energy stocks (XLE) outperformed all sectors, followed by Consumer Staples (XLP) and Healthcare (XLV):


Year-to-date, however, Energy (XLE), Financials (XLF) and Industrials (XLI) -- ie. cyclical sectors -- remain the worst performers by far. In fact, all sectors are down big and the only reason Staples (XLP) aren't down more is that people need to eat (typical bear market action).


Lastly, it's been a long week, let me end with some important and hopeful information.

First, it might make sense to where a mask, especially if you're venturing into crowded areas or if you're working with the public:



Second, US scientists think the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine, administered to millions of Indian children soon after birth to protect against tuberculosis, could be a "game-changer" in the fight against the deadly coronavirus:



It looks promising but it's too soon to tell if this will be a game-changer. One medical expert shared this with me:
"It sounds great and easy to deploy but these are all ecologic studies (correlation patterns at a global level and not based on individual level data) which definitely would need randomized trial evidence even if correlations are strong. There are typically many other factors that could explain such correlations. For example, the high correlation between vaccination proportions and low mortality from SARS 1 and 2 could be a reporting issue if same countries do to track disease incidence and cause of death to the same degree. BCG vaccinations tend to be widespread in countries where the provision of health care is not optimal given TB is still endemic.

From a biologic perspective, one would have to assume that TB and this virus have some epitopes in common and the antibodies against TB induced by the BCG vaccine provide some cross immunity with coronaviruses that was previously not suspected/known. It sounds good but I don’t know how often cross immunity has been documented between viruses and bacteria. "
Anyway, I hope scientists discover something promising soon, we all need good news on this coronavirus.

Below, CNBC's "Halftime Report" is joined by Richard Fisher, former president of the Dallas Federal Reserve, to discuss his outlook for the US economy.

Also, CNBC's Kelly Evans talks with Larry Lindsey, former National Economic Council director, about his outlook for the U.S. economy. Take the time to listen to Lindsey, he raises really important issues.

Third, Spencer Levy, CBRE head of research, joins 'Power Lunch' to discuss how the coronavirus pandemic will and is affecting the commercial real estate industry.

Lastly, Mohamed El-Erian discusses how stock market could still touch new lows as uncertainty around the coronavirus pandemic persists. I completely agree, be very careful trying to pick bottoms in this environment. If a coronavirus depression forms, we haven't hit bottom yet.




Michael Sabia's Return to Infrastructure Bank?

$
0
0
The Canadian Press reports that Canada Infrastructure Bank CEO Pierre Lavallée is out, Michael Sabia in as new chair as Liberals shake up infrastructure bank:
The federal government is shaking up the top spots at the Canada Infrastructure Bank, including saying goodbye to the chief executive and installing a new board chair.

Out is Pierre Lavallee, the first CEO of the infrastructure financing agency that the Liberals created two years ago.

In as the new board chair is Michael Sabia, who was on an advisory group that recommended creating the agency, and a former chief executive of the Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec that is behind an electric-rail project in Montreal that the bank is backing.

In a statement, the Liberals say the changes “signal a new phase” for the financing agency and come at a “critical time” to address the “health and economic consequences” of Covid-19.

The Trudeau Liberals created the bank in late 2017 to use $35 billion in federal financing over a decade to help governments at all levels partner with the private sector to build revenue-generating roads, highways, bridges and electricity and water systems.

About $15 billion of that is money the government doesn’t expect to get back.

The agency faced political opposition at its creation, and then criticism for the slow pace at which it was evaluating and signing deals.

In a statement, Finance Minister Bill Morneau said Sabia’s experience with infrastructure would be “a critical asset as the bank accelerates its activities.” Sabia becomes chair on April 15 to replace former RBC executive Janice Fukakusa, who signalled her interest in stepping down months ago.

The agency had told Finance Department officials last year that it had 25 projects on the verge of being announced by early 2020 and was looking to engage with investors in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Japan and China.

The update, from a briefing note and accompanying presentation provided to the top civil servant at the Finance Department, also noted a need to effectively tell Canadians about the agency’s work.

The Canadian Press obtained a copy of the document under the Access to Information Act.

One presentation slide says the bank should “demonstrate the public benefit” — the words are underlined — from projects to back up its investment decisions, and the benefits “clearly communicated to Canadians.”

The rest of the page, discussing communications, has been blacked out.

The document also says that the agency should “lead in disrupting” how things get built in this country, as well as how governments cover the cost.
On Friday, the Canada Infrastructure Bank put out a press release announcing leadership changes:
Today, the Canada Infrastructure Bank Board of Directors announced a change in leadership that will position the Bank to build on its strong foundation to support more revenue generating infrastructure projects in the public interest.

As part of this transition, Canada Infrastructure Bank CEO Pierre Lavallée, who served as the Bank’s CEO since June 2018, is stepping down effective immediately. Canada Infrastructure Bank CFO and CAO Annie Ropar will oversee the operations of the Bank and report to the Board until a new CEO is appointed.

We wish to thank Mr. Lavallée for his committed service and for his vision and foresight in building the Bank’s capacity to attract investment, engage private sector partners and explore new and innovative approaches to finance and deliver projects that benefit Canadians.

“I am proud of the progress that CIB has made and of the team of dedicated experts that we have assembled. CIB has already committed $3.6B to projects valued at $20B. In addition, CIB is working on a large pipeline of new projects in collaboration with over 100 public sponsors from coast to coast to coast at the federal, provincial, territorial, municipal and Indigenous government levels”, said Pierre Lavallée.

In addition, the Chair of the Board, Janice Fukakusa has decided to step down from her position as of April 15, 2020. Ms. Fukakusa advised the government last fall that she would like to complete her service as Chair in early 2020 so that she could focus on her other commitments in the public and private sectors. She has agreed to remain on hand at the organization over the coming weeks to ensure a seamless transition and provide the Bank with stable oversight as it navigates various challenges posed by the COVID-19 outbreak.

“It has been a great privilege to serve as the founding Chair of the Bank and I am grateful to the Government of Canada for the opportunity. The Canada Infrastructure Bank is critically important, and I am proud of the work we have done to stand up the Bank to support Canada’s 21st century infrastructure needs. As I step down, the Board and the Bank as a whole are ready to step up to serve Canadians well,” said Janice Fukakusa.

The Board wishes to thank Janice for her exceptional leadership and commitment. We are all very proud to have served with her.

As Ms. Fukakusa continues in her role over the weeks ahead, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy Director Michael Sabia has been appointed to the Board as Chair-Designate. Mr. Sabia is the former CEO of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec. The Board welcomes Mr. Sabia’s appointment and looks forward to working with him in furthering the objectives of the Canada Infrastructure Bank.

2020 will be a pivotal year for the Bank as its leadership focuses on collaboration with provincial, territorial, municipal, federal, Indigenous and private sector investor partners, so that priority projects can move from conception to completion. As we emerge from the current crisis posed by COVID-19, the case for ambitious infrastructure planning and the role of the Bank has never been stronger.

About the Canada Infrastructure Bank

Canada Infrastructure Bank is a crown corporation focused on financing and supporting the development of revenue-generating infrastructure projects that serve the public interest. Formed in 2017, the Bank has a mandate to attract and co-invest with private sector and institutional investors, with particular focus on areas such as public transit, trade and transportation, green infrastructure and broadband.
So, Pierre Lavallée and Janice Fukakusa are out and Michael Sabia is the new chair.

I can't say I'm surprised, the Canada Infrastructure Bank hasn't been firing on all cylinders and it's been the target of heavy criticism within the financial industry and outside it.

Pierre Lavallée is a very nice and smart guy. He dresses a bit quirky (apart from Jim Grant, who wears bow ties in 2020?!?) but he knew his stuff and was trying to get things off the ground but the pace was frustratingly slow. He made some operational blunders and bad hires but overall, he did a decent job but it just wasn't good enough.

As far as Janice Fukakusa, I don't know much about her but if you ask my blunt opinion, she was in way over her head and she was not the right inaugural chair for such an important organization. It was a political appointment, and a very bad one at that.

The Liberals came to their senses and appointed Michael Sabia as the new chair of the board. Sabia has tremendous connections with the Liberals and the fact that he was appointed the new chair shows just how much power and respect he commands in Ottawa.

So what lies ahead for the Canada Infrastructure Bank? Well, knowing Michael Sabia, he's going to move very fast to recruit a new CEO and ramp up infrastructure investments very quickly.

The obvious candidate to lead the infrastructure bank is Macky Tall, someone Sabia groomed for the position of CEO of the Caisse and someone he knows very well and trusts.

Recall, Macky Tall, Head of Liquid Markets at CDPQ and President and CEO of CDPQ Infra, was the Board's initial choice to be next CEO but Premier Francois Legault decided to appoint Charles Emond.

Since that happened, speculation has run amok as to Macky Tall's next move, but with the return of Michael Sabia to the scene as the new chair of the Canada Infrastructure Bank, I can assure you conversations have already taken place between him and Macky.

The big sticking point? Compensation. The Canada Infrastructure Bank pays well but nowhere near as well as the $2 million+ compensation Macky Tall is commanding at CDPQ.

Unless, of course, Sabia changes that and gets the federal government to sign off on it, which they will in this environment.

Another potential candidate? Mark Wiseman, the former CEO of CPPIB who left BlackRock. Michael Sabia knows him well too and both men once wrote an op-ed for the Globe and Mail back in 2016 on how the private infrastructure bank will put Canada on a path to growth.

And Canada definitely needs growth. The plunge in oil prices and COVID-19 and its after-effects will profoundly shape the Canadian economy going forward. Every single sector and industry will be impacted, including infrastructure.

Sabia knows all this, he has no time to waste and he profoundly believes infrastructure is the new paradigm for growth.

So get ready, I expect operations at the Canada Infrastructure Bank are going to ramp up significantly, and since all the CEOs at Canada's large pensions know Sabia well, they too are eagerly awaiting a major pickup in its operations.

Below, Frances Donald, chief economist at Manulife Investment Management, discusses the long-term effects of the COVID-19 crisis. This is by far one of the best interviews and I urge everyone to take the time to listen to her, she has excellent insights. Click here if it doesn't load below.

As far as Michael Sabia, he too has written his opinions on how in this pandemic, governments will face three tests —including how best to restart the economy. You can read his op-ed here.

Pandemic Hedge Fund Winners and Losers

$
0
0
Nathan Vardi of Forbes reports on the winning and losing hedge funds of the March pandemic:
Pierre Andurand is an oil trader known for making big bets. His Andurand Capital hedge funds were coming off two straight years of losses, but in February Andurand wagered the coronavirus would shake up the oil market and he started to short oil aggressively.

With the price of Brent crude crashing below $23 in March, Andurand’s hedge funds performed incredibly well. His Andurand Commodities Discretionary Enhanced Fund soared by 152.9% in March and returned 122.2% in the first three months for 2020. The Andurand Commodities Fund rose by 63.7% last month and has returned 53.1% in 2020. Andurand Capital’s assets, which were about $1 billion a year ago, are roughly split between the two funds.

Efforts across the globe to deal with COVID-19 have sent the global economy into a tailspin and financial markets along with it. But some hedge funds shined in March, trading around the market volatility as they were designed to do even as many of their traders worked from home. There were, however, hedge funds that struggled mightily as the Standard & Poor’s 500 index plunged in March and finished the first quarter of the year down 19.6%, including dividends.

Boaz Weinstein’s Deutsche Bank proprietary trading operation suffered big losses during the 2008 financial crisis, but in the most challenging market since that time, Weinstein’s $2 billion hedge fund operation did very well. Weinstein’s main Saba hedge fund returned 72% net of fees in the first three months of 2020. Another big winner was Eric Cole, whose Warlander Asset Management hedge fund shorted corporate credits and municipal bonds in March, fueling a 30% first-quarter return.


Some stock-picking hedge fund manages did get hit hard in March. Billionaire Larry Robbins’ flagship Glenview Capital hedge fund fell by –30.47% in the first three months of 2020. Other stock pickers, like billionaire Dan Loeb, saw their funds have losses, but nevertheless have outperformed the stock market. Loeb’s main hedge fund has lost 16% in 2020. On the other hand, billionaire Bill Ackman famously hedged his portfolio against the virus in early March and his Pershing Square Holdings returned 3.3% in the first quarter.

Prominent macro hedge funds, which tend to bet on currencies, interest rates and commodities, seemed to hold their own amid the market upheaval. Billionaire Alan Howard’s main Brevan Howard hedge fund was up 23% in the first quarter of 2020. Andrew Law’s Caxton Global Investment macro hedge fund was up 7.2% for the year as of March 27, 2020, according to an HSBC survey of hedge funds.

But not all macro hedge fund strategies did well amid the coronavirus shock. Robert Gibbins’ Autonomy Capital was down 20% in March. Ray Dalio’s Bridgewater Associates, the biggest hedge fund firm in the world, saw its main hedge fund lose about 16% in March, meaning it returned –23% in the first three months of 2020. “The novel coronavirus is a pandemic that came on fast and hit us at the worst possible moment because we had a long tilt in our positions,” Dalio wrote to his investors in March.

The big multimanager hedge funds seemed to hold their own while markets were being rocked in March, but even for them it was a wild ride. Billionaire Ken Griffin’s main Citadel hedge fund is up about 6% for 2020, according to Bloomberg News. Balyasny Asset Management’s Atlas Enhanced flagship was up 4.75% in the first quarter, while ExodusPoint was up 1.2% for the year. Billionaire Israel Englander’s Millennium Management and billionaire Steve Cohen’s Point72 Asset Management are both about flat for 2020.

Some quantitative traders did experience problems in March. Billionaire Jim Simons’ Renaissance Institutional Equities Fund was down 14.4% in the first quarter of 2020, as well as his Renaissance Institutional Diversified Alpha Fund was down 10.5% over the same period. Both still outperformed the U.S. stock market. The Renaissance Institutional Diversified Global Equities Fund was down 10% in the first quarter. David Harding’s big computer-driven hedge fund lost 12.9% in the first quarter. But even among computer-driven hedge funds there were some standouts. Leda Braga’s Systematica BlueTrend fund, for example, was up 9.4% for the year as of March 27, 2020.
Good for Leda Braga, aka, the hedge fund queen, she has turned in a solid performance this year:


Now, a few words on hedge funds. It seems the pandemic has been a bit of a blessing for most hedge funds but I warn you, even though some think the worst is behind us, the year isn't over and in my opinion, the really tough period lies ahead:















Importantly, the big money has been made shorting oil and stocks, going forward the real alpha wizards will stand up.

I say this because you'll recall my earlier comments on 2018 hedge funds winners and losers and the world's most profitable hedge fund where I explicitly stated this:
When you're running billions in a long-only concentrated portfolio like that and the beta winds are blowing your way, well, if you're lucky, it's not hard to beat the S&P 500.

But if you look at Hohn's long-term performance, that's where things get interesting because he has consistently delivered great results and his investors have profited greatly over the years. That's not something a lot of hedge funds can boast about.

In fact, Chris Hohn's TCI Fund Management and Stephen Mandel's Lone Pine Capital led hedge fund gains last year, respectively returning $8.4 billion and $7.3 billion to clients in 2019.

Still, I'm not going to lie, activist funds and L/S funds make me nervous, I've seen plenty of superstars get killed over the years or run into serious trouble. Lest we all forget, legendary value investor Bill Miller beat the S&P 500 for 15 years in a row (through 2005) before running into a very cold streak where he underperformed for years and still hasn't recovered.
And ended by stating this:
As far as the hedge fund industry and which are the top hedge funds, I stand by my comments, right now I put Citadel ahead of the pack in terms of delivering great risk-adjusted alpha in all market environments, but there's no doubt, TCI Fund Management was the world's most profitable hedge fund last year and it has also delivered great returns over the years taking very concentrated long-only positions.
Well, it turns out  I was right as Chris  Hohn’s hedge fund suffered its steepest ever monthly decline in March as the global market turmoil hit his stock bets:
The Children’s Investment Fund lost about 19% during the month, the worst since it started in 2004, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The decline pushed the fund’s first-quarter loss to about 23%, the people said, asking not to be identified because the information is private.
Admittedly, one bad month or quarter or even year is fine, but my point is what if this is a protracted downturn, how well can these activist hedge funds which take concentrated long-only positions really perform in a brutal bear market?

Also worth noting, Pierre Andurand wasn't the only hedge fund manager scoring big returns as oil prices declined but he correctly predicted the rout in oil prices and he's also been a vocal critic on Twitter on the lack of urgency regarding the coronavirus pandemic.

In other words, Pierre not only saw the supply shock on oil, he also saw the huge demand shock the pandemic is causing which helps explain his huge gains.

Will he be able to reproduce such huge gains? No, even if you ask him, he will be honest about that, but he has cemented his place in the pantheon of elite hedge fund managers focusing purely on oil (there aren't many left).

My point with this comment is not to get all wrapped up into how any particular hedge fund performed last month or last quarter -- good or bad -- but to warn you, the more brutal period has yet to arrive and when it does, you want to focus your attention on the few hedge funds that can offer you scalable, high risk-adjusted returns in any environment.

This is why I still recommend Ken Griffin's Citadel, Steve Cohen's Point72, Izzy Englander’s Millennium and Dmitry Balyasny’s Balyasny Asset Management, they're the multistrategy shops I expect to outperform in a very difficult market.

Are there others? Of course there are but if I was an institutional investor, I wouldn't roll the dice on just anyone and I would focus on those that have a proven track record to deliver real, scalable alpha in all market environments.

This is the time to really kick the tires and really understand how your managers are positioned and how well they manage risk. Ask a lot of questions even if it irritates the hell out of your managers (tough luck, that's the name of the game!).

Below, hedge fund titan Bill Ackman warned just over two weeks ago that "hell was coming" and called for a nationwide shutdown. On Sunday, Ackman said he his growing more optimistic. CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin reports.

As I explained in my comment on the Ackman bottom or bottom of hell, take what all these hedge fund gurus publicly state with a shaker of salt. I like Ackman, follow him on Twitter, but he's way too optimistic (talking up his book!) and has no idea how the coronavirus depression will impact markets.

Of course, as Ray Dalio once asked me: "What's your track record?" I certainly don't hold a monopoly on wisdom on markets, the economy or coronavirus but lately my track record has been a lot better than Ray's and some of these other hedge fund gurus.

The Sustainable Capitalism Wake-Up Call

$
0
0
Gordon Power, chief executive and chief investment officer of Earth Capital, wrote an op-ed recently on how a more sustainable capitalism will emerge from COVID-19:
The main concern that is paralysing the financial markets right now is uncertainty. Investors and the business community are questioning how long this crisis will last, and when consumer and investor confidence will return, with no end in sight.

But while none of us can predict the future, when it does return, one possible outcome is that the crisis could cause an unprecedented shift in capital — potentially for the better. Why? Because coronavirus is a test of which companies will be most resilient to another global crisis: climate change.

Over the last few years, we have seen financial institutions and global companies promise to adopt environmental and social initiatives as the penny — the global climate threat — drops. Encouragingly, many of the world’s largest firms seem to be increasingly aware of the risk that climate change poses to their business models. Business news in the months leading up to the coronavirus crisis was dominated by pledges to cut emissions, promises to build sustainable portfolios, and the emergence of in-house ESG teams.

But while progress has certainly been made, global emissions have continued to rise to the highest level on record.

The clock is ticking to address the climate crisis. The required technology and awareness for change is already here: what is now needed is a wake-up call for this change to become reality. And Covid-19 could be that wake-up call.

Capitalism in its current form threatens value — and is more vulnerable to losing it. Sustainable capitalism, on the contrary, creates value and has proved to be more resilient to systemic risks. As markets around the world have plunged in the last few weeks, one of the main losers from the economic consequences of the pandemic has been fossil fuel-intensive companies. In stark contrast, sustainable infrastructure has demonstrated stronger resilience in these challenging times.

Once viewed with suspicion, funds with a sustainability mandate have proved their mettle, and now routinely outperform other funds. This could be the prompt that investors have been waiting for — a phenomenon that could see greater prevalence toward sustainable funds.

Transitioning to a low-carbon economy means dealing with growing physical risks such as extreme weather events and investing today to avoid future risk scenarios developing. Covid-19 has shown our dependencies on fossil fuel-intensive companies and is providing an unexpected stress test, enabling us to see how prepared they — and, indeed, all companies — may be for the climate change shocks that are on the horizon.

As environmental disasters, dramatic shifts in energy markets, and legislative changes emerge, those funds that have absorbed the Covid-19 shock are likely to demonstrate their resilience once again. Companies are sensitive to market signals, and as investors move to resilient low-carbon alternatives, all businesses will be forced down the same route regardless of size or sector.

We estimate that about 70–80 per cent of the cost of achieving the net-zero emissions target must come from the private sector. It is a big spend, but also a big opportunity. Contributing to a low-carbon, sustainable future could provide a greater pay-off to investors over the long-term.

The economic shock of coronavirus will have woken up investors to this new reality. When this devastating crisis is over, we can only hope that the world has learned the lessons necessary to ensure that our future is more sustainable — and more secure.
Recall, I recently discussed impact measurement in private equity, sharing insights from Jim Totty and Richard Burrett of Earth Capital.

Anyway, a friend of mine quipped last week: "Anybody talking about ESG these days?".

He was being facetious and basically telling me "nobody cares about ESG when it hits the fan," which is why I am bringing up Gordon Power's comment.

COVID-19 has been a gigantic wake-up call in more ways than one. It has shown how dismally unprepared the world was for a pandemic.

In the same vein, Gordon Power is warning us the world is woefully unprepared for a climate disaster, one we know is coming and one we better take seriously, especially now that this pandemic has exposed just how vulnerable we are to exogenous mega shocks.

Actually, these are more endogenous shocks, we created them and we and the next generation are going to live the repercussions of our decisions.

Gordon ends his comment by stating "we can only hope that the world has learned the lessons necessary to ensure that our future is more sustainable — and more secure."

I'm a lot more pessimistic but I too hope the world wakes up and starts to tackle big problems in an open, transparent and sustainable way.

By the way, even renewables aren't escaping the wrath of coronavirus. Anmar Frangoul of CNBC reports the coronavirus is hitting renewable energy supply chains and factories, and could slow the global energy transition:
Global renewable energy capacity hit 2,537 gigawatts (GW) at the end of last year, an increase of 176 GW compared to 2018, but the coronavirus continues to cast a shadow over the sector’s prospects for 2020, impacting both supply chains and manufacturing facilities.

According to figures from the International Renewable Energy Agency’s (IRENA) “Renewable Capacity Statistics 2020” report, new additions last year were slightly lower than the revised total of 179 GW added in 2018.

Looking at the bigger picture, however, the organization said Monday that renewables “accounted for 72 per cent of all power expansion” in 2019, with solar and wind growing by 98 GW and almost 60 GW respectively. Together, these two technologies were responsible for 90% of renewable additions in 2019.

In terms of other sources, hydropower growth was described as being “unusually low” last year. In a foreword to the report, IRENA’s Director-General Francesco La Camera explained that a number of large projects had “missed expected completion deadlines.”

Breaking things down geographically, the report shows that Asia was responsible for 54% of renewable capacity additions last year.

While the additions reported by IRENA may appear promising overall, this year looks set to pose a number of challenges for the renewables sector, many of them connected to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has caused issues with supply chains and forced some factories to shut.

There are also fears that the pandemic could negatively affect investments in clean energy, while the steep drop in oil prices is another factor that could potentially make renewables less attractive to some markets.

IRENA’s La Camera acknowledged the impact that the coronavirus pandemic would have going forward.

“As an existential threat, the multi-faceted fallout from coronavirus … now sits alongside climate change as a defining challenge of our time,” he wrote.
Challenges ahead

On Monday, Wood Mackenzie projected that 3 GW of solar photovoltaic and wind installations in India could be delayed due to the lockdown currently in place there.

“The timing of the lockdown is unfortunate as Q1 (the first quarter) is typically one of the busiest periods for wind project installations,” Robert Liew, a principal analyst at the research and consultancy firm, said in a statement.

“The lockdown will delay some projects until summer, and if the lockdown is extended past April, wind farm construction could be further delayed into the monsoon season, where wind installations are typically at their lowest,” he added.

Wood Mackenzie added that solar photovoltaic installations in India were “expected to be hit hard” because the sector was “heavily dependent” on Chinese photovoltaic module imports, which had experienced disruption because of the virus.

Globally, the wind industry is undoubtedly facing challenges. Toward the end of March, the Global Wind Energy Council said its forecast of continued growth across the next five years — more than 355 GW of additions — would “undoubtedly be impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, due to disruptions to global supply chains and project execution in 2020.”

It was, however, “too soon to predict the extent” of the coronavirus’ impact on both energy markets and the wider global economy, the GWEC added.

On a regional level, the impact of the pandemic has already had an impact. According to industry body WindEurope, while “the majority” of wind turbine and component factories in Europe are continuing to operate, 18 manufacturing sites are currently closed. All these facilities are in Spain or Italy, which have been hit particularly hard by the pandemic.

A number of other factories, WindEurope says, “have temporarily paused activity as a precautionary step to strengthen sanitary measures within the sites and guarantee full compliance with government recommendations.”

Europe’s supply chain also “experienced some disruptions” in February related to components and materials coming from China. According to WindEurope, supplies are now “ramping back up again.”
Great article, shows you how renewables are being impacted by coronavirus and of course, the plunge in oil prices, but I expect growth in renewables will pick up strongly next year no matter where traditional energy prices lie.

The world is shifting, asset managers need to shift with it and start incorporating climate risk in their risk management framework.

And now they need to incorporate a pandemic in their models too (we will undoubtedly see another one over the next 20 years or sooner).

Lastly, a few tweets I posted on Twitter today (follow me here, been posting way too much lately):







Inequality is hitting home with this coronavirus and I saw something on Twitter which broke my heart today:



Think about it, a young lady with cerebral palsy helping older people load groceries into their carts and cars wasn't given any mask or hand sanitizer and she died from coronavirus. It's a cruel disease and particularly cruel to the most vulnerable in our society.

But there is hope too, there seems to be an effective treatment on the horizon using blood plasma from recovered patients:



We need treatments as well as serological tests to tell us who has had COVID-19 and has antibodies and is fit to go back to work:



Below, IHS Markit experts in clean energy technology recently sat down to discuss how coronavirus (COVID-19) could impact the renewables industry. This frank discussion is between IHS Markit experts Sam Wilkinson, Edurne Zoco, Eduard Sala de Vedruna, Francesco D’Avack, and Cormac Gilligan. Their experts cover topics including the solar supply chain and expectations for 2020, the disruption to demand on the wind industry, and how long renewable companies can survive.
>

AIMCo Gains 10.6% in 2019

$
0
0
The Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo) released its results for 2019, gaining 10.6% last year:
Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo) announced today its financial results for the year ended December 31, 2019. On behalf of its 30 Alberta-based pension, endowment and government fund clients, AIMCo earned a total fund return of 10.6% net of all fees, representing approximately $11.5 billion in net investment income, with assets under management reaching $118.8 billion. The annualized total fund returns over four and ten years were 7.0% and 8.2%, respectively.

“As institutional investors we understand that even well-diversified portfolios are bound to deliver more favourable returns in some years compared to others,” said Kevin Uebelein, Chief Executive Officer. “While over the long-term, we are proud that AIMCo has earned its clients strong value-added investment performance across all asset classes — beating the benchmark in ten of the past twelve years at the total fund level — we acknowledge that in the short-term we have not met our clients’ expectations.”

“Despite all asset classes earning strong absolute returns, some did not outperform their respective market benchmarks in 2019,” added Chief Investment Officer Dale MacMaster. “Illiquid assets, for instance, which have consistently posted strong returns over the past few years, experienced more modest performance last year. On the public equities side, for active managers like AIMCo, it was a challenging year — the market was very narrow, with fewer stocks and fewer sectors exceeding their benchmarks. Remaining patient while being willing to innovate will ultimately serve our clients well, especially in this current investment climate.”

For the one-year period ending December 31, 2019, AIMCo’s total fund return is 0.5% below that of its benchmark. On a four- and ten-year basis, AIMCo continues to demonstrate strong value add, outperforming its benchmark by 0.5% and 0.8% for each period respectively.

While 2019 held its own challenges, 2020 is unparalleled with the global economic impact of COVID-19 and an oil price war causing virtually all asset values to be significantly repriced and investment markets to enter a period of sudden and unprecedented volatility. In extreme markets such as this one, where so many asset classes decline together, the typical benefits of portfolio diversification will be diminished in the short-term.

“Our team is responding decisively in an effort to protect our clients’ liquidity and assets in the near- and medium-term, while still identifying longer-term investment opportunities that will come out of these challenging market circumstances.” said Uebelein. “We know the impacts to their portfolios during these times of market uncertainty will be significant, and we are committed to accountability and full transparency to our clients as we navigate these conditions together.”

Detailed performance information will be available in AIMCo’s Annual Report to be released in June 2020

ABOUT ALBERTA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (AIMCO)

AIMCo is one of Canada’s largest and most diversified institutional investment managers with $118.8 billion of assets under management, as at December 31, 2019. The organization’s mandate is to maximize risk adjusted net investment returns in a manner responsive to the needs and expectations of its 30 Alberta-based pension, endowment, government, and specialty fund clients. Balanced fund pension and endowment clients account for $100.0 billion of assets under management, and are most representative of AIMCo’s overall performance, as they utilize the full range of the organization’s asset and style capabilities. Government and specialty fund clients account for $18.8 billion of assets under management, and largely rely on AIMCo for its expertise in managing fixed income assets and for liquidity management. Established as a Crown corporation on January 1, 2008, AIMCo is operationally independent — operating on commercial principles and at arms length from the Government of Alberta — yet strategically aligned with the Province as shareholder. The organization is committed to the highest standards of corporate governance including an independent, highly-qualified and diverse Board of Directors that draws on global experience to provide meaningful guidance and oversight to the organization.

For more information please visit www.aimco.ca
Given that the annual report needs to be approved by Alberta's legislature and won't be available till June, I cannot refer to it here.

However, this afternoon, I spoke with Dale MacMaster, AIMCo's CIO, and we went over some key points. Before delving into that discussion, I'd like to thank Dénes Németh, Director, Corporate Communication, for setting up this call.

Now, Dale and I chatted for a good 30 minutes and we went over last year's results as well as what is going on in markets this year.

In 2019, AIMCo gained 10.6% net, 50 basis points less than its benchmark. Dale told me the Balanced Fund which is more representative of how AIMCo manages its big clients, gained 11.8% vs a benchmark of 12.5%.

Here are the main points we covered concerning last year's results:
  • "Last year was a great year to invest. There were trade issues but growth was decent and interest rates were accommodative. Every asset class performed well, you couldn't go wrong. "
  • Nonetheless, even though Public Equities performed well, "the market was even more narrow than in 2018". Dale told me "five stocks -- Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Google and Microsoft --  accounted for 17% of the gains in the S&P 500, adding 3% to the overall return."
  • In Private Markets, returns came down. Real Estate went from 12% in 2018 to 4% in 2019. Private Equity went from 20% in 2018 to 4.5% in 2019. And Infrastructure went from 12% in 2018 to 4.4% in 2019. 
  • Dale told me the PE strategy shifted five years ago, they are still ramping up fund investments and co-investments "which is why our program is more volatile than more mature PE programs of our peers, we still have J-curve effects." The PE program is only $3 billion and growing.
  • He said in private equity, they focus on middle market funds where they can be a more influential/ larger partner. However, he did admit that middle market funds have more operational and key man risks and require more due diligence since they lack the size and depth of larger funds. ("we make sure carry is distributed across the organization”).
That was the extent we discussed last year's results. We then got into a discussion of what is going on this year:
  • Going into 2020, he said valuations were high but not stretched, things looked good, the economy was strong, and then all hell broke loose.
  • He said he's going to retire soon and "in the last 12 years, I've seen two 1 in 100 year events." 
  • "Initially it looked like SARS, we thought it would be a V-shaped recovery, and then as it got a lot worse, the bottom in equities fell out, stocks collapsed, the VIX spiked to levels not seen since 1929 or 1987, and even bond volatility exploded. Hedge funds, ETFs, mutual funds, risk parity funds all exacerbated volatility."
  • He said: "It became evident it would be a U-shaped or Nike swoosh shaped recovery, and now with the unprecedented monetary and fiscal stimulus, it looks like a V-shaped recovery but who knows. The world has changed, people are adapting, working remotely, home schooling their kids, practicing isolation and social distancing, it's a whole new world."
  • I sensed Dale was cautiously optimistic. "In 2008, the financial system was going to implode, the Fed took its time to ramp up QE. Now, the Fed and other central banks have responded more forcefully and quickly and governments have also responded quickly on the fiscal front. It's the 2008 playbook on steroids. We are dealing with a pandemic, governments have closed economies for health reasons, they will eventually open them up again -- 50, 60 or 70% -- and we will recover. Of course, some sectors will recover more quickly than others as people assess the health risks of flying, going to restaurants, etc. But I see millennials going out once the lockdown is eased. "
  • He said central banks and governments "don't care about the size of their balance sheet". The US economy was $21 trillion before this happened and "they already spent $2 trillion and will spend another $2 trillion in May." 
  • He added "central banks are providing liquidity and programs buying up troubled spots in credit markets" like high yield, CLOs, and covenant-lite and uni-tranche loans which were experiencing difficulties before this occurred.
Nevertheless, Dale was a lot more cautious on private markets:
  • There are real challenges in real estate. "Malls are closed, most tenants aren't paying their rent (except for anchor ones) and many won't survive and will likely file for bankruptcy."
  • He said multi-family and industrial are doing alright and will likely continue to do well.
  • I told him that I see many companies will likely stop leasing expensive real estate office space in downtown cores after this pandemic and keep people working remotely. He admitted "behaviors will change" and said a lot of things need to be revisited, like open office space.
  • He said unlike 2008, "today we are making private markets more regularly and conservatively."
  • He expects vintage 2020 to be a great year for private equity, "just like 2008".
In terms of his focus now, he highlighted four areas:
  1. "Ensuring our employees are safe and working well remotely."
  2. "Ensuring we meet all our liquidity needs (collateral commitments and private market ones).
  3.  "Triaging assets"
  4. "Assessing opportunities in credit markets, listed real estate and infrastructure, REITs, and other potential distressed listed securities they can co-invest with their partners."
Lastly, and most importantly, Dale told me most of their pension clients are fully funded and they remain committed to their long-term asset allocation.

Once again, I thank Dale MacMaster for taking the time to speak to me, he made me feel a bit more optimistic (but I remain more bearish than him).

Markets are closed tomorrow and I'll try to go over a lot of market stuff I couldn't cover here.

Below, Kevin Uebelein, chief executive officer at Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo), talks about how one of Canada's largest pension funds is managing the shock waves from COVID-19. He says with the oil crash, energy companies need to keep being competitive so that the forward momentum doesn't stop. Click here if it doesn't load below.

The Tiger King Market?

$
0
0
Fred Imbert and Pippa Stevens of CNBC report the S&P 500 jumps more than 1%, capping off its best week since 1974:
Stocks rose sharply on Thursday, wrapping up a big week of gains, after the Federal Reserve detailed a bevy of programs to support the economy during the shutdowns from the coronavirus pandemic.

The S&P 500 gained 1.5% to close at 2,789.82 while the Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced 285.80 points, or 1.2%, to 23,719.37. The Nasdaq Composite closed 0.8% higher at 8,153.58. The U.S. stock market will be closed Friday due to Good Friday.

For the week, the S&P 500 surged 12.1%. That was its biggest one-week gain since 1974, when it rallied more than 14%. The Nasdaq had its best week since 2009, jumping 10.6%. The Dow soared more than 12% for one of its biggest weekly gains on record.


“It’s been a strong week in equities and probably for good reason,” said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management. “Many stocks were widely considered to be in oversold, and then you’ve got policy assistance that’s in motion at the Fed and in fiscal policy.”

“That’s clearly helping sentiment, but we still find it difficult to get overly bullish when the duration of COVID-19 remains unknown,” Sandven added.

The Fed announced a slew of programs, including loans geared towards small and medium sized businesses, that will total up to $2.3 trillion. The central bank also gave more details on its plans to buy investment-grade and now even junk bonds.

“This Fed is the most aggressive Fed. They do not want to be known as the reason why we went into a depression,” CNBC’s Jim Cramer said on “Squawk Box” on Thursday. “I’m very impressed. The Fed is on its game and this is what is needed because we got to fight off a depression, we got to get America open for business.”

Thursday’s announcement was enough to outweigh another massive jump in weekly jobless claims. More than 6 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits last week. Economists expected an increase of 5 million. The latest data built on the record-shattering prior two readings of 6.6 million and 3.3 million.

Virus outlook improves

Wall Street’s weekly surge came amid increasing hope that the situation around the coronavirus was improving. In recent days, the number of new daily confirmed cases has dropped globally and in the U.S. New York state has also reported a decline in its virus-related hospitalization rate.


Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin also told CNBC on Thursday the U.S. economy could be re-opened in May. He noted the department was doing “everything necessary that American companies and American workers can be open for business and that they have the liquidity that they need to operate their business in the interim.”

But some believe that stocks are now getting ahead of themselves and investors should exercise caution.

“I think this is kind of buy the rumor and potentially we sell the news when reality sets in of what we are going to see what’s on the other side,” billionaire investor Mark Cuban said Wednesday on CNBC’s “Closing Bell.”

“I think people are naturally optimistic right now in terms of the market. I just don’t think they’re really factoring in what we’re going to see on the other side,” he added.


JPMorgan Chase jumped nearly 9% to lead the Dow higher on Thursday. Dow Inc gained 5.1% while Goldman Sachs advanced 4.1%. Financials were the best-performing sector in the S&P 500, gaining more than 5%.

After Thursday’s rally, the Dow is up more than 27% from its March closing low, but still down 16.9% this year.

“The stock market is at a very uncertain point now. The impact of the coronavirus on future earnings is yet to be determined. We aren’t out of the woods,” said Nancy Davis, chief investment officer at Quadratic Capital.

And Nathalie Harrison of Bloomberg reports that US junk bonds rally the most in two decades with the Fed now a buyer:
U.S. junk bonds rallied the most since 1998 after the Federal Reserve’s historic move to begin buying some of the speculative-grade corporate debt.

The extra yield investors demand to own the securities instead of Treasuries narrowed 86 basis points Thursday to 785 basis points, the lowest level since March 13, according to the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High-Yield index.

The Fed’s announcement that it would buy a limited amount of recently downgraded junk debt gave the market its biggest boost since spreads surged to distressed levels last month amid a pandemic that has shut down large parts of the economy. Average yields on the debt fell by almost a percentage point to 8.48%, index data show.

Spreads had reached 1,100 basis points on March 23, the widest level since the global financial crisis.


To keep credit flowing, the central bank is expanding a corporate bond-buying program to include debt that was investment-grade as of March 22 but later downgraded to a rating of no lower than BB-, the third-highest junk grade.

In doing so, the Fed is essentially opening up its balance sheet to potentially hundreds of billions of dollars worth of notes that are expected to fall into speculative grade in the coming months as the impact of the pandemic hits corporate cash flows.

The Fed can also buy exchange-traded funds that track speculative-grade debt. Those funds surged the most in a decade following the announcement. All together, the programs will support as much as $850 billion in credit.
It's Good Friday, so let me wish everyone celebrating Catholic Easter a nice Easter weekend. Our Greek Orthodox Easter is next week and it will be a very quiet one.

Anyway, earlier today, I had a chat with Aaron Vale of CBRE Caledon and we had a great conversation about life under COVID-19, markets, infrastructure (their specialty), and central planned capitalism.

Aaron is a very sharp guy and very well informed. We talked about the trouble this pandemic has caused in certain transportation infrastructure assets like airports where traffic is down over 96 percent:



"You have never had a global synchronized shutdown of economies. Depending on when they mark them (end of March or end of June), some of these assets will be technically insolvent."

He said they have been focusing on data storage and fiber assets but see great long-term potential now in airports. "As in all crises, people tend to overestimate the long-term impact on some assets".

I asked Aaron to follow up with a more detailed comment on infrastructure which I'd like to post on my blog.

We also talked markets and he's just as bearish as I am, raising these points:
  • The psychological effects of this pandemic are widespread. Even when governments reopen economies, it won't be business as usual, many small businesses are going to go bankrupt.
  • The rally from March lows was all liquidity driven but there's trouble ahead as earnings will crater and the earnings yield will fall to zero.
  • There's not enough fear out there, the buy-the-dip mentality still rules the day. 
  • The weakest companies going into this crisis are the ones that got a lifeline from the response to the pandemic.We are wtinessing the zombification/ Japanification of our economy.
  • The bailouts and latest Fed measures once again benefit the financial elite and will exacerbate inequality even more.
I told Aaron I was thinking of my market comment today and think I will call it "The Tiger King Market" based on the Netflix hit Tiger King.

If you haven't seen Tiger King, no worries, it's definitely not for everyone and is basically the story of large private zoos in the US with large cats and the people behind them. The central characters are "Joe Exotic", a flamboyant, gun-toting owner of the Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park in Oklahoma and Carole Baskin, owner of Big Cat Rescue in Florida.

Joe Exotic has a long feud with Carole Baskin and eventually goes to jail for plotting to kill her.

The whole series is outrageous and completely surreal. No doubt, its popularity is based on the strange underground world of big cat conservationists and collectors and it's perfect mindless television to get people's mind off of the coronavirus crisis.

But it's also the central characters and the drama between them which has captivated millions who are eager for more.

Anyway, I was telling Aaron, I feel like we are living a real life tiger king market, it's a bit surreal that unemployment in the US and elsewhere is skyrocketing to levels we haven't seen in decades and yet stocks are rallying during a week where coronavirus is exacting its highest toll on humanity.

I know the mantra, don't fight the Fed, and stocks always lead the economy but I worry people are smoking some real bad hopium thinking this will be another "buy the dip opportunity" and stocks will rally right back up in the greatest V-shaped recovery ever.

Here's some food for thought, reopening the economy isn't like turning on a light switch. Even if the US economy reopens in May, it will be a depression-like economy:


And plans to reopen are downright scary:



What else? There's still a lot we don't know about COVID-19 and there are legitimate concerns that low antibody levels will lead to higher reinfection risk:



"Yes, all this is true, but the Fed and Congress will just keep pumping trillions into the economy and everything will be just fine."

Maybe but I'm willing to bet a lot of money that this isn't going to be a V-shaped recovery, it will be more like an M-shaped recovery, so prepare for the worst as we enter a very tough period ahead:



I also agree with those who rightfully think if the Fed bails out everybody, it's not really bailing out anyone:



Lastly, I agree with those who rightfully point out how insane it is to bail out hedge funds and private equity funds when millions of people are losing their job:





As I keep telling you, if you really want to understand capitalism, you need to read C. Wright Mills' classic, The Power Elite. If you're too lazy to read, just watch George Carlin's classic skit on The American Dream. He nailed it years ago!

Anyway, enjoy your Easter weekend, stay safe everyone.

Below, among the eccentrics and cult personalities in the stranger-than-fiction world of big cat owners, few stand out more than Joe Exotic, a mulleted, gun-toting polygamist and country western singer who presides over an Oklahoma roadside zoo. Charismatic but misguided, Joe and an unbelievable cast of characters including drug kingpins, conmen, and cult leaders all share a passion for big cats, and the status and attention their dangerous menageries garner.

But things take a dark turn when Carole Baskin, an animal activist and owner of a big cat sanctuary, threatens to put them out of business, stoking a rivalry that eventually leads to Joe’s arrest for a murder-for-hire plot, and reveals a twisted tale where the only thing more dangerous than a big cat is its owner. Watch the trailer below, and yes, I think Carole Baskin fed her former husband to her lions!

And CNBC's "Halftime Report" team is joined by Social Capital CEO Chamath Palihapitiya to discuss his view of the markets amid the coronavirus pandemic. Listen carefully to what he says.

Third, Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban joins"Closing Bell" via phone to discuss the state of the markets and the economy, as well as when the NBA season may resume.

Lastly, short-seller Jim Chanos, Kynikos Associates founder, discusses the state of private markets amid the coronavirus pandemic, why he is still bearish on Tesla Inc. and the sectors he is shorting with Bloomberg's Scarlet Fu and Joe Weisenthal on "Bloomberg Markets: What'd You Miss?"




A Value-Based Approach to ESG Integration?

$
0
0
Mark Wiseman and Tariq Fancy wrote a comment for Pensions & Investments on how integrating ESG into investment portfolios improves performance:
Interest in sustainable investing has surged around the world in recent years. In boardrooms, C-suite offices and policy conferences, the stakeholder has overtaken the shareholder as the primary focus of discussion.

Across the business world, conversation about sustainable investing still tends to center on new products, from green bonds to impact private equity funds, with less attention paid to the process and return enhancements that can be achieved by incorporating sustainable insights into traditional investment processes — particularly by integrating environmental, social, and governance considerations.

Done well, improving existing investment processes though the integration of ESG can mitigate portfolio risks and unlock long-term opportunities. In other words, it is about what all investors should strive for: enhancement of return and/or mitigation of risk.

Even so, despite pronouncements from senior leaders, skepticism still abounds among those whose buy-in is critical for ESG integration to succeed: The portfolio managers and investment professionals responsible for capital allocation decisions who are on the front line of this process and need to develop tools, data and analysis to better assess these factors. It is as critical as financial ratio analysis.

What the skeptics miss is the primary reason for investors to integrate ESG into their portfolios: such integration correlates with improved long-term performance. Simply put, in the long run, values and value converge.

The prevailing, values-based view identifies three main reasons why an asset manager might focus on integrating ESG insights into their investment processes. The first is for reputation, marketing and public relations: especially since the global financial crisis, the financial services industry has sought to communicate how it can provide value to society.

A second motivation is to address growing client demand for ESG-conscious investment processes — a desire to deliver what the market wants. A third reason is to preempt growing regulation of how investors incorporate ESG considerations. While the U.S. still lags other jurisdictions on this front, the overall direction of travel is clear.

But all three of these motivations miss the most powerful argument for integration — the potential to improve their portfolios' risk-adjusted returns. By underweighting that primary goal and focusing solely on one or all of the above commercial motives, managers are more likely to integrate ESG in a way that does not improve returns and can even cause performance drag.

Many skeptics' concerns arise mainly because asset managers conflate two distinct approaches to sustainable investing: A historical one that starts from personal values and a newer approach based solely on investment value. The former, a historical values-based approach, sets out from a client's moral and ethical viewpoints, screening out objectionable investments. However, this approach theoretically narrows the investment universe and can create longer-term performance drag.

Unlike a values-based approach, an investment value-based approach starts from material ESG insights (say, that an issuer's rising carbon emissions intensity is a predictor of equity underperformance) and then integrates these ESG-informed insights into security selection (i.e., underweighting issuers with rising emissions intensity).

Unlike the other motivations for ESG integration, the value-based approach actually leads to better investment decisions and is far less likely to have unintended consequences. For instance, it would reward companies that take material steps to improve their ESG performance and therefore provides incentive for change (such as encouraging oil majors to invest in a transition to renewable energy), whereas screening just leaves poor performers to continue to be owned and controlled by investors that are disinterested in negative ESG impacts.

Whereas a values-based approach to ESG integration may seek to manage negative "externalities" that firms cause for society (such as pollution), an investment value-based approach only considers those externalities that society is likely to "internalize" to the firms (say, with a pollution tax) — and thus affect long-term financial performance. A value-based approach does not look at all ESG issues for all companies, but rather adapts based on sector (environmental issues are more material to the financial performance for energy companies, whereas social and governance issues dominate for tech firms).

The kind of value-based approach to ESG integration that we advocate is driven solely by the goal of better investing. It is thus fully compatible with even the narrowest definition of fiduciary duty (i.e., return maximization).

This value-based advantage is particularly relevant for traditional fundamental and private investments strategies. As we have seen, it is increasingly difficult to outperform benchmarks in traditional active equities by using only financial data, which is fully transparent and immediately priced into markets.

If investors start to incorporate a value-based approach to sustainable investing, they can take advantage of less obvious insights related to sustainability and ESG factors. While difficult, understanding information that is still not well documented, less standardized, hard to quantify, but increasing in investment materiality is precisely where there is an opportunity to outperform — which is exactly what clients pay active managers to do.

So, while it is encouraging to hear themes of sustainability and responsibility echoing in the halls of Davos, many are still approaching them from the wrong angle. A longer-term and investment-led approach to sustainability will see a better outcome where value and values truly converge. Simply put, a true value-based approach is more likely to achieve the values outcome that many are trying to achieve.

For ESG integration to grow across the asset management industry, we need a clearer narrative for what it is and how it can drive outperformance that is not linked to reputation, client demand, regulation, or any other commercial imperative besides simple long-term risk-and-return-based capital allocation decisions — and the opportunity to use additional data and insights to improve long-term investment returns across a portfolio.

Mark Wiseman, is former senior managing director at BlackRock Inc. and former CEO of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, based in New York and Toronto. Tariq Fancy, based in Toronto, is special adviser to the president at Ryerson University and former chief investment officer of sustainable investing at BlackRock. This content represents the views of the authors. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines, but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.
This is an excellent comment which argues for a certain kind of value-based approach to ESG integration, one driven solely by the goal of better investing (ie. return maximization).

Last week, I discussed the sustainable capitalism wake-up call and agreed with those who think we need to start taking ESG and sustainable capitalism more seriously in light of this pandemic.

The comment above written by two experts doesn't focus on sustainable capitalism or the coronavirus, it just states that taking the right value-based approach to ESG integration will lead to better long-term returns.

The authors state: "A longer-term and investment-led approach to sustainability will see a better outcome where value and values truly converge. Simply put, a true value-based approach is more likely to achieve the values outcome that many are trying to achieve."

In other words, it's not a dichotomy, approached the right way, ESG will lead to more sustainability and better returns over the long run.

Here's something else to think about. Susan Murphy of GreenBiz reports that amid plunging stock prices, ESG leaders are holding their own:
If there’s anything the novel coronavirus pandemic has shown us, it’s how deeply interconnected so many of our basic survival systems are. This comes as no surprise to investors who incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) analysis into their strategies. In expert hands, an ESG investment lens teases out all sorts of risks that aren’t necessarily apparent in conventional financial analysis.

It’s not just theoretical: Amid plunging stock markets, ESG investments have fared better than the overall market. During March, 62 percent of ESG-focused large-cap equity funds outperformed that index, according to Morningstar.

So far this year, 59 percent of U.S. exchange-traded funds focused on ESG performance are beating the S&P 500 Index, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. That outperformance could spur further demand for ESG funds — an area already attracting growing investment before the pandemic hit.

What might be behind this? One of the fundamental aspects of fully integrated ESG analysis is a recognition that most issues that affect the business world (and the world in general) are interrelated and cannot be evaluated in isolation. This truth rises in stark relief as infections spread exponentially across the globe and basic economic systems falter under increasingly stringent containment measures.

Supply chain clarity

Global supply chains present an excellent example. ESG investors regularly focus on supply-chain transparency as they consider how companies manage human rights abuses in commodity mining and environmental damage associated with deforestation and overfishing, among other concerns. These challenges often occur many steps up a supply chain, and when companies struggle to address them, it’s often because they simply don’t know much about where their raw materials really come from and who provided them.

In a similar vein, as this pandemic started to disrupt supply lines from China as its authorities began to shut down economic activity, many companies were caught by surprise when their own products or services were affected.

According to Jennifer Bisceglie, CEO of risk management platform Interos, most companies never really have thought about their supply-chain risk, and even those that do often go only as far as their direct suppliers. Few understand or consider the complex web of interactions that must occur in order for those direct suppliers to fulfill their commitments.

Harvard Business Review (HBR) recently echoed this sentiment, noting how critical it is for companies to know their suppliers. While the scale of this pandemic is unprecedented, it is far from the first occurrence of supply-chain shocks. The HBR reminds us, "After the 2011 Sendai earthquake in Japan, it took weeks for many companies to understand their exposure to the disaster because they were unfamiliar with upstream suppliers. At that point, any available capacity was gone."

ESG questions, data-driven answers

Jeff Meli, global head of research at Barclays, said companies should expect more questions from investors about their resilience and contingency planning, according to a recent Wall Street Journal article. For example, investors necessarily will want to know more about employee sick leave policies, disaster preparedness and the like.

Such questions come at a time when innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning allow third parties to provide data-driven intelligence on companies that well could contradict their public reporting.

For instance, AI-powered data providers are capable of scouring social media posts around the world to see how companies’ employees are talking about their company’s response to the pandemic, allowing investors to determine how well the results stack up against company disclosures. As one financial analyst (who asked that their name be withheld) told GreenBiz: "The data will pick up the hypocrisy."

Truvalue Labs, which uses AI to uncover timely ESG data on a variety of asset classes, already has identified the emergence of material issues that are specific to COVID-19, including employee health and safety, labor practices and supply-chain management.

Outperformance factors

Many observers believe that strong ESG performance indicates better management, which translates into stronger long-term returns. The idea is that management teams that do a good job of minimizing their environmental footprint, promoting good employee relations and creating resilient governance structures are more likely to be adept at running all other aspects of a company’s business.

“ESG funds tend to be biased towards higher-quality companies with a stronger balance sheet, companies that are run better and operate more efficiently,” Hortense Bioy, director of passive strategies and sustainability research at Morningstar, told the Financial Times.

An additional, complementary explanation has emerged recently. Adrian Lowcock, head of personal investing at Willis Owen, explained that funds with strict ESG selection criteria are the ones that have held up the best because they tend either to be under-invested in oil and gas or to exclude the sector entirely.

Indeed, sustainable investors have long been concerned about climate change and the prospect that fossil-fuel companies will lose value as the world eventually makes a concerted effort to address it. Oil and gas companies have been among the worst hit in the current downturn for a variety of reasons, not least because many of them are overleveraged and drowning in debt. But that, too, is connected to sustainability and climate considerations, and the whole point of deep ESG analysis is to understand the complex ecosystems within which companies operate.

Many investors have questioned how much climate change truly will present a material investment consideration anytime soon, given many world leaders’ reluctance to tackle the risk at a regulatory level. Here too, the current pandemic ultimately may prove to be a game-changer. Mark McDivitt, global head of ESG at State Street, told GreenBiz:
The United States plan to spend $2 trillion, or 10 percent of GDP, for economic stimulus has been critical to addressing this acute Black Swan event as it relates to the negative impact on our economy. What’s equally imperative but less obvious is the need to spend $2.4 trillion per year globally over the next decade to keep temperatures from rising 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial levels — also a Black Swan event but on a "slow burn," and with a demonstrably greater adverse impact than the fallout from COVID-19.
Science — which does not concern itself with political expediency — points to an ever-growing risk that climate change fallout will be at least as disruptive to society as the current pandemic, the more so the longer the world drags its feet on the sort of massive structural adjustment the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says we need to make.

Some traditional investors have framed their resistance to ESG investing in terms of fiduciary duty, arguing that they are charged strictly with maximizing returns, not with pursuing environmental and social aims. Perhaps this pandemic will highlight the fact that ESG analysis, as McDivitt noted, is really just about evaluating 21st-century risks and opportunities.

If this pandemic demonstrates anything, it’s the need to pivot and begin addressing these long-term sustainability factors. Investment strategies that fully integrate ESG analysis surely will benefit.
There's a lot to think about and even though I don't agree with everything in this article, I agree with a lot and her conclusion.

Below, Kara Mangone, Chief Operating Officer of Goldman Sachs’ Sustainable Finance Group, discusses how the global pandemic is impacting the way corporations and investors approach ESG.

And Mark Wiseman, former CEO of CPPIB and former investment executive at BlackRock tells investors to "stay the course", with ability to re-balance their portfolio. He also offers his economic outlook, and thoughts on the growing importance of "resiliency in supply chains". Click here if it doesn't load below.

Mark provides sound advice to investors but I remain very cautious on the economy and markets and think the world will change irrevocably once we get through this pandemic (follow me on Twitter here).

Lastly, Mark Wiseman posted this on LinkedIn:



So, keep in mind on Thursday, April 16 at 12:00 pm, he will be moderating a virtual discussion with the Canadian Club Toronto featuring Blake Hutcheson, Jane Rowe and Kevin Uebelein.You can register for free here.It should be a great discussion.

CalPERS’ Untimely Tail-Hedge Unwind?

$
0
0
Julie Segal of Institutional Investor reports on the inside story of CalPERS’ untimely tail-hedge unwind:
The California Public Employees’ Retirement System had unfortunate timing.

When markets crashed in March, CalPERS missed a payout of more than $1 billion after cutting its crash-hedging program as part of a cost-curtailment effort and because of a lack of understanding of how tail hedges work, according to sources familiar with the situation.

CalPERS was paying about 5 basis points, or 0.05 percent, for the externally managed part of a tail-risk insurance program that protected about $5 billion in assets. In October 2019, as investors worried about the inevitable end of the longest bull market ever, the pension plan decided to end the hedging initiative because it was too costly.

Universa Investments ran the largest portion of the mandate, while LongTail Alpha of Newport Beach, CA, managed another portion. CalPERS gave them the standard 90 days to unwind their positions.

Nassim Taleb, who wrote the popular book The Black Swan in 2007, advises Universa. That firm had disposed of CalPERS positions by January. LongTail’s hedge was in the unwinding process between January 1 and March 31 and may have generated a final distribution of around $150 million to $175 million. Universa and LongTail declined to comment.

CalPERS’ chief investment officer Ben Meng, who came aboard in January 2019, stands by the decision.

“We terminated explicit tail-risk hedging options strategies because of their high cost, lack of scalability, and the fact that there are better alternatives available to CalPERS,” Meng told Institutional Investor Thursday.

“At times like this, we need to strongly resist ‘resulting bias’ — looking at recent results and then using those results to judge the merits of a decision,” Meng cautioned. “We are a long-term investor. For the size and complexity of our portfolio, we need to think differently.”

Tail-risk hedging programs are similar to life insurance. With tail hedges, like any insurance policy, investors pay a small amount each year — a sunk cost — for a large potential payout if the event that is being insured against occurs. This was the crux of the problem at CalPERS, according to sources. There was a lack of understanding of that cost and thinking of it as a management fee of sorts. CalPERS “benchmarked” the tail-hedge program to the generic benchmark for the fund itself. It did not have a customized benchmark, so the 5 basis points just became another cost for CalPERS.

This isn’t the way tail hedges should be assessed, according to Universa, one of the former external managers. “Risk mitigation performance must of course be measured by its ‘portfolio effect’ — specifically, the impact it has on the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of the entire portfolio whose risk it is trying to mitigate,” the firm told clients in a recent letter obtained by II.

For example, Universa recommends a hypothetical portfolio of a 3.33 percent allocation to its tail-risk product, coupled with a 96.67 percent position to the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index, a proxy the firm uses for the systematic risk being mitigated.

In the month of March 2020, the hypothetical portfolio showed a compound annual growth rate of 0.4 percent. In March, the S&P 500 stock index lost 26.2 percent at its lowest point, and closed the month down 12.4 percent. For the year to date, Universa’s hypothetical portfolio had a CAGR of 16.2 percent, versus the S&P 500’s 4.5 percent. The model has produced a CAGR of 11.5 percent since March 2008 inception.

According to one source, CalPERS’ tail-hedge program “may have been swept up in a purge of many inefficient active manager programs. But the program was never meant to be under the mandate for these other programs. By design, it loses a little bit of money during good times with a huge benefit during a severe drawdown in equities.”

CalPERS’ decision to establish a crash-insurance policy goes back to 2016 under previous CIO Ted Eliopoulos. The pension system was trying to be cautious as it was still smarting from the global financial crisis, and started evaluating different tail risk managers that year. By August 2017, CalPERS hired Universa and LongTail Alpha. It set up a smaller in-house program to run related strategies, and planned to reassess the program every three to six months to see if it would meet expectations.

The initiative got a few tests, including the market selloff in February 2018, which it passed. CalPERS continued to increase its allocation. Then in the fall of 2019, with a new leader in place, CalPERS cut the program.
Bloomberg also posted a story on how CalPERS missed a $1 billion payday by scrapping a market hedge and of course, naked capitalism was all over it (Yves loves posting negative comments on CalPERS).

I recently covered pandemic hedge fund winners and losers and stated the following:
[...] Yahoo Finance reports that Universa Investments posted an astonishing year-to-date return of more than 4,000% in March following “one of the scariest months on record,” even as the firm issued a stark warning about a still-overinflated market:



You'll recall, I covered Mark Spitznagel's tail risk fund in mid-February when I went over the crash of 2020. Talk about delivering some real tail risk! (he will never produce such spectacular returns ever again in his life and his returns inception to date are less than stellar).
A few things to bear in mind about these tail-risk funds:
  • Ben Meng is right, they are not scalable strategies 
  • They were hemorrhaging money for over a decade as markets melted up
  • Since inception, most of them have delivered very lousy returns and charged hefty fees for doing so
  • There is a "resulting bias" and it looks like a dumb move now but for a pension fund the size of CalPERS, with hundreds of billions under management and a long investment horizon, maybe they felt focusing on tail-risk strategies wasn't worth their attention, and I think this makes sense.
The only thing I would do differently now at CalPERS is start investing in some very scalable macro/ CTA/ Quant hedge funds and focus on scalable alpha they and multistrategy funds offer.

Remember, I applauded CalPERS's move to nuke its hedge fund program back in 2014, mostly because they didn't take it seriously and it wasn't delivering the absolute return target it needed to deliver. I also applauded CalPERS's move to chop its external managers in half in 2015.

Recall the famous words OTPP's former CEO Ron Mock once told me: "Beta is cheap, real alpha is worth paying for. You can swap into any index to gain access to beta for a few basis points."

In other words why pay an active manager big fees for underperforming an index or not delivering absolute returns, especially during a market downturn?

If I were advising CalPERS now, I'd tell them to start ramping up the alpha across private and public markets.

Ben Meng can talk to many of his Canadian counterparts for insights but I'd also recommend he talks to Vincent Morin, Nelson Lam, and Marc-André Soublière of Trans-Canada Capital here in Montreal.

Not only did their internal multistrategy fund led by Marc-André perform well in March, they maintained a fully funded position for Air Canada Pension.

I cannot emphasize enough that we are heading into a very tough period. You wouldn't know it looking at the Nasdaq (QQQ) but this is just another mega sucker rally which will falter once reality sinks in and earnings crater:


So, forget about "tail-risk" funds being advised by Nassim Taleb and focus on scalable alpha generators across private and public markets.

CalPERS is having a big board meeting next week where investments will be covered in detail.

I hope they don't spend too much time on this tail-hedge unwind and focus on the future.

Below, Paul Schatz, Heritage Capital, joins"Closing Bell" to discuss the state of the markets.

I agree with him, there's not enough fear and we're not going back to normalcy. People need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid but admittedly, this liquidity-driven silliness can go on till end of the month (we shall see).

Also, CNBC's "Halftime Report" team is joined by Marc Lasry, CEO of Avenue Capital, to discuss how markets are trading and the outlook for the U.S. economy. Great discussion and he also thinks it will take a while to return to normalcy.


Does Private Equity Deserve Public Bailouts?

$
0
0
Steven Davidoff Solomon, director at the Berkeley Center for Law, Business and the Economy, wrote an op-ed for The New York Times looking into whether private equity deserves public bailouts;
In the competition for a federal bailout, venture capital won the first round. Now, private equity is fighting back — and winning.

The first round was the $350 billion Paycheck Protection Program, which provides forgivable loans of up to 2.5 times companies’ monthly payroll. The program is limited to businesses with no more than 500 employees, and it specifically excludes financial firms.

Businesses are flocking to the program, but the Small Business Administration initially barred most companies that are funded by venture and P.E. firms. The administration’s affiliate rule lumps together businesses with common controlling shareholders, so all of a firm’s majority-owned businesses count toward the employee limit. Private equity has lobbied vociferously for a waiver, but the government has not granted one.

For most venture-backed companies, the problem is not majority ownership, but that the affiliate rule covers companies where an investor has “negative control” rights, like the ability to veto board decisions. Faced with forgoing a potential government grant or losing control rights, venture firms have rushed to eliminate these rights. Their extensive banking relationships also make them more attractive to lenders than unfamiliar mom and pop businesses.

This only remaining issue for venture firms is a moral one: Do they really need these loans? After all, V.C. and P.E. funds have nearly $1.5 trillion in uncalled capital, otherwise known as dry powder. The number of venture-backed companies that refused to participate in the program is unknown, but anecdotally there are some.


The second round of bailout wrangling is where private equity is coming out on top.

Apollo successfully lobbied for another Fed program — the $100 billion Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility — to purchase a wider range of investment-grade securities, particularly the mortgage-backed and commercial real estate debt popular among many P.E. firms. The need for this is obvious: If landlords don’t get paid (however politically popular that is) there are mass disruptions to the economy. P.E. firms can also get in on the Fed’s $600 billion Main Street Business Lending Program for midsize companies.

There’s widespread criticism of bailing out P.E. funds. But whatever you think about this, public pensions are dependent on private equity investments for returns, and their portfolio companies employ millions. Frankly, the industry is too politically savvy to let these critical arguments stand in the way.

I would expect the next round of stimulus to be even more friendly to private equity. Unlike venture funds, P.E. financiers do not have the same moral misgivings about lobbying aggressively for federal assistance.
Did you catch that last part? He's right, public pensions are dependent on private equity investments for returns, and their portfolio companies employ millions.

Nobody wants to give private equity titans billions in public bailouts but the truth is PE funds invest in commercial real estate and they employ millions of people in their portfolio companies which are typically mid-size firms with less than 500 employees (some are much large).

And who invests in PE funds? Large public pensions and sovereign wealth funds.

If you ask me, I have less of a problem bailing out large private equity funds than bailing out hedge funds which speculate on markets:



At least PE funds invest directly in mid-size to large companies and try to reshape them over a long period.

Earlier today, I saw this comment on LinkedIn on whether PE deserves a bailout:
Yes it does. It is just as vital, and probably more, to the economy as first-line borrowers (banks).

The problem is another, once you get used to the notion that someone will save you in difficult times, your mindset gets spoiled.

I would like to quote Mr. Henry Kravis: "A real entrepreneur is somebody who has no safety net underneath them".
I responded:
Great quote, Kravis is right, a real entrepreneur is somebody who has no safety net underneath them. But as we see now, a pandemic can destroy even the best entrepreneurs. The best will rebuild but they need assistance. My problem with PE funds and hedge funds looking for a public bailout is it exposes how utterly unprepared they were for a major downturn. For years, they borrowed cheaply thanks to the Fed and were incentivized to take risks they normally wouldn’t take and now the chicken has come home to roost.
A lot of companies were unprepared for a major downturn and now they're lining up for a bailout.

Lastly, as I've said repeatedly, bailouts are going to become the norm going forward, and if things get really bad in US Pension Land, Congress will bail out public pensions not because they care about pensioners (they don't), but because they want to fund private equity and hedge funds in perpetuity.



Of course, they will window dress it and make it look like they're bailing out public pensions but that's not the real reason behind it.

And therein lies the problem, the entire capitalist system is holding on by a thread, one bailout after another, and the financial elite are making off like bandits, exacerbating inequality.

In fact, David Rosenberg tweeted something yesterday that caught my attention:



The financialization of our economy has reached epic proportions, everyone's fortune is tied to the stock market, and the same goes for public pensions relying on hedge funds and private equity funds. There's just too much at stake to let them fail.

Below, CNBC's "Halftime Report" team is joined by Social Capital CEO Chamath Palihapitiya to discuss his view of the markets amid the coronavirus pandemic. Listen carefully to what he says.

And short-seller Jim Chanos, Kynikos Associates founder, discusses the state of private markets amid the coronavirus pandemic, why he is still bearish on Tesla Inc. and the sectors he is shorting with Bloomberg's Scarlet Fu and Joe Weisenthal on "Bloomberg Markets: What'd You Miss?"

Lastly, Francine Lacqua speaks with The Blackstone Group Chairman and CEO about his drive for success, his attitude toward investments and the importance of education. Great discussion, well worth watching this interview and reading his book on what it takes to pursue excellence.

Update: After reading this comment, Bruce Schoenfeld of 3P Associates shared this on LinkedIn:
Is there any other answer besides no? Most PE firms lever up their acquisitions to unsustainable levels and pay themselves massive dividends and management fees. And the taxpayer is now being asked for help? That, my friend, is the definition of chutzpah!
I completely understand why he feels this way but like I said, PE funds are employing millions in mid-size to large companies and as such, they have an argument as to why they deserve bailouts.

Also, Timothy Hosking, economist, shared this on LinkedIn:
Bail out is for the economy to kickstart and prevent a meltdown. If the equity is of pension origins then a yes, otherwise go to the back of the queue. Same goes for rent seeking organisations.
It's tough to disassociate if the equity was of pension origin but it's safe to assume all pensions have big stakes in the success of private equity and are hoping that these bailouts can limit the damage to their portfolio companies.


Public Pensions and the Pandemic

$
0
0
Earlier today, I watched a panel discussion moderated by Mark Wiseman on public pensions and the pandemic:
The effects of COVID-19 are being felt across every aspect of our economy and lives. What are the leaders of Canada's public pension funds doing to ensure that our retirement savings are safe in these unprecedented times?

Join Canadian Club Toronto on Thursday April 16th for a virtual discussion with our expert panel of pensions fund leaders featuring Blake Hutcheson (OMERS), Jane Rowe (Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan), and Kevin Uebelein (Alberta Investment Management Corp.), moderated by global investment manager and business executive, Mark Wiseman. The panel will dive deep into the challenges they are facing in our current environment, how they are pivoting to protect their portfolios, and the threats and opportunities that may emerge for Canadian public pension plans during this crisis.

This virtual event is free of charge. All you need to access the event is to register.
I embedded this discussion below and it's definitely worth watching and listening to the insights these pension executives provide.

It's pretty cool that Mark Wiseman and these panelists did this remotely and that the Canadian Club in Toronto provided it free of charge.

I found this an excellent discussion and paid particular attention to their comments on private markets as I am particularly interested in these markets given the difficulties airports, malls, and private companies are facing during this pandemic.

One thing I am increasingly worried about is what happens if this global economic shock lingers and the duration of this crisis is longer than what many are currently anticipating.

Private markets can absorb one or two bad quarters, not one or two bad years and this represents a real challenge for Canada's public pensions which are heavily invested in private assets.

However, Kevin Uebelein said something interesting, "there's more transparency in private markets" as they have a seat at the table and are able to discern exactly what is going on.

Blake Hutcheson is a real estate expert and he said industrial and multifamily are fine but hotels and retail are getting hit extremely hard.

I spoke with a real estate lawyer last night who told me he's seeing more deals lately and thinks the big developers are fine with a more balanced portfolio (government tenants, pharmacies, grocery stores, etc.).

This real estate lawyer was less bearish on retail than Canada's big pensions, telling me "you don't hold retail for revenues" but hold it for long term when the land can be developed into multifamily real estate. "The problem with Canada's large pensions is they need returns every year but if they took development risk, they'd realize they are sitting on a gold mine over the long run."

Jane Rowe offered excellent insights on contingency and liquidity planning but she admitted some portfolio companies will face real hardship (they recruited BCG and KPMG to help their portfolio companies navigate this crisis).

She did note, however, that Teachers' entered this year reducing risk but in hindsight, she wishes she sold more last year (they still sold $7 billion in PE).

This afternoon, OTPP announced that Jane Rowe will become Vice-Chair, Investments, effective October 1, 2020:
Ziad hindo, Chief Investment Officer of the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board (Ontario Teachers') today announced that Jane Rowe, currently Executive Managing Director and head of the Equities department, will take on the new role of Vice-Chair, Investments, effective October 1, 2020.

Continuing to report to Mr. Hindo, Ms. Rowe will hold an advisory role with respect to Ontario Teachers’ investments. She will provide advice and counsel on the US portfolio including Cadillac Fairview investment activities, mentor senior employees, liaise with alumni and support the build of our alumni network, represent Ontario Teachers’ at external speaking engagements and on portfolio company boards, and continue to sponsor Pride and diversity and inclusion initiatives.

“Over the past decade, Jane has brought a distinctive and exceptional perspective to the table. She is an accomplished investor and team builder with the ability to inspire and develop our future leaders,” said Mr. Hindo. “The role she is taking on next will allow us to benefit in new ways from the special set of skills she has developed over her career.”

Ms. Rowe joined Ontario Teachers’ as head of private equity in 2010. Her mandate was subsequently expanded to include high-conviction equities, public or near-public company investments intended to generate superior financial returns. Under her leadership, net assets managed by the Equities team have grown from $11 billion to $47 billion, with an annualized rate of return before administrative costs of 18.5% as at December 31, 2019. The team’s portfolio includes more than 60 private companies, significant investments in public companies, and relationships with more than 30 private equity funds.

“I am proud of our team, the portfolio that we have built, and what we’ve accomplished together over the past decade for the plan and its members,” said Ms. Rowe. “I look forward to working with the investment leadership team, taking a broad perspective to help position our private asset portfolio and the investment teams for the future.”

Ms. Rowe will continue to sit on boards associated with Cadillac Fairview, Ontario Teachers’ wholly-owned real-estate subsidiary, and Camelot Group PLC, the operator of the UK National Lottery. A search is underway for a new head of Equities and an announcement will be made when this is finalized.
This sounds like a form of staged retirement as Teachers' has lost a few senior ladies over last few years (Nicole Musicco and more recently Barb Zvan) and they need Jane to stay on as she has deep experience and expertise which they need as she prepares to retire from that organization.

What else? This afternoon, CDPQannounced new appointments to maximize expertise and face global economic challenges:
Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ) announced today some appointments and changes to its organizational structure to maximize the expertise of its teams to be well positioned to face global economic challenges.
“At the beginning of the year, it was clear that the challenges of the next decade would be very different from the last decade’s challenges. Since then, in only a few weeks, the world as we know it has transformed. It’s even more important to have increased agility in our decision-making processes and closer coordination in all aspects of strategy and managing our assets,” said Charles Emond, President and Chief Executive Officer of CDPQ. “With these appointments and changes to our structure, we can fully leverage the talent of our people. Regrouping our teams within strong business units will increase our efficiency and ability to seize more opportunities.”
First, Macky Tall is appointed Head of Real Assets and Private Equity, a new investment business unit that is home to key asset classes for CDPQ, created to increase the organization’s impact in those sectors. Through his various roles, Mr. Tall has built strong and lasting connections with CDPQ’s business partners. His track record includes achievements such as globally positioning our infrastructure activities and strengthening our operational expertise in Liquid Markets. In his new position, he will be responsible for the International Private Equity, Infrastructure and Financing Solutions teams, as well as for CPDQ Infra, where he remains President and Chief Executive Officer. Leadership of these teams remains unchanged. Mr. Tall is also appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Ivanhoé Cambridge, which will provide him with a broad perspective on our real assets activities, including real estate, where the portfolio’s repositioning is already well underway under the leadership of Nathalie Palladitcheff, President and Chief Executive Officer of the real estate subsidiary.

As a result of these changes, a search process to recruit a replacement for Mr. Tall as Head of Liquid Markets has been launched. Mr. Tall will fill the position in the interim with the support of the teams in place.

In addition, in Liquid Markets, Helen Beck is appointed Executive Vice-President and Head of Equity Markets. As the leader of this portfolio, Ms. Beck has overseen equity market activities in recent years, demonstrating solid expertise in portfolio management and the capacity to stay the course through various cycles. Ms. Beck will join the Executive Committee and report to the new Head of Liquid Markets.

Kim Thomassin, who was serving as Executive Vice-President, Legal Affairs and Secretariat, is appointed Executive Vice-President and Head of Québec Investments and Stewardship Investing. Ms. Thomassin possesses extensive knowledge of Québec’s businesses and a vast network, she is recognized for her command of the files she works on and for her negotiating skills. Her role includes responsibility for the Québec Private Equity teams as well as Espace CDPQ. In addition, Ms. Thomassin will continue to oversee the Stewardship Investing team, whose mandate is anchored to the heart of CDPQ’s mission.

Lastly, Chief Economist Martin Coiteux’s mandate is expanded. Mr. Coiteux, who is recognized for his deep understanding of the global economy and sharp analytical skills, takes responsibility for the Global Strategy team. His integrated team will develop the main pillars of the strategy in close collaboration with the Executive Committee and various CDPQ teams.

Macky Tall, the new Head of Liquid Markets, Kim Thomassin and Martin Coiteux will all report to the President and Chief Executive Officer. These appointments are effective immediately.
These are all great appointments, I congratulate Macky Tall, Kim Thomassin, Helen Beck and Martin Coiteux. I also applaud Charles Emond for making these new appointments so early in his tenure as new CEO, that shows true leadership.

I recently discussed how Michael Sabia was appointed the new chair of the Canada Infrastructure Bank and how I thought he would recruit Macky to head up this organization.

Well, I guess Macky is staying put at CDPQ and that is a good thing for that organization (they need his experience and leadership).

So, who will take over the Canada Infrastructure Bank? I mentioned Mark Wiseman and there's another infrastructure expert I definitely recommend, Andrew Claerhout, the former head of Infrastructure at OTPP who recently joined Searchlight Capital Partners.

To be brutally honest, OTPP should hire Andrew back to lead private markets but their pride will prevent them from doing so (Ron Mock and Bjarne Graven Larsen specifically royally screwed that up, in what will go down in history as the worst HR move OTPP ever did, followed by Wayne Kozun).

No apologies from me, I call it like I see it and I couldn't care less who I irk.

Anyway, there is someone else I'd highly recommend to Michael Sabia, someone Macky Tall hired at CDPQ Infra who is no longer there. You need a specific skill set to be the leader of the Canada Infrastructure Bank and someone who understands Ottawa very well and who can get things done properly and expeditiously.

Below, take the time to watch today's panel discussion on pensions and the pandemic, it's an hour long and well worth watching.

I really like what Blake Hutcheson said about his father being a serial entrepreneur and always optimistic. “If you don’t believe in tomorrow, you shouldn’t be in business.”

The Great Market Disconnect?

$
0
0
Fred Imbert of CNBC reports the Dow jumps 700 points on hope for a coronavirus treatment, closes at highest level since March:
Stocks surged on Friday after a report said a Gilead Sciences drug showed some effectiveness in treating the coronavirus, giving investors some hope there could be a treatment solution that helps the country reopen faster from the widespread shutdowns that have plunged the economy into a recession.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied 704.81 points, or 3%, to 24,242.49. It was the Dow’s first close above 24,000 since March 10. The S&P 500 closed 2.7% higher, at 2,874.56 while the Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.4% to 8,650.14. er, at 2,874.56 while the Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.4% to 8,650.14. (Click here for the latest market news.)

Boeing shares jumped 14.7% after the airplane maker said it would resume production in the Seattle area as early as April 20. The company also said Friday it would resume operations in the Philadelphia area.

“It’s far too early to signal the all clear, but what this demonstrates is that coronavirus is a health problem that requires a health solution,” said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors, about the prospects of a coronavirus treatment. “If we can develop a health solution, I think at least from a market perspective, things will rebound pretty quickly.”


Friday’s gain led the S&P 500 to its first back-to-back weekly gains since early February and propelled it above its 50-day moving average. The broader market index climbed 3% for the week while the Dow gained 2.2%. The Nasdaq advanced 6.1% week to date. Through Friday’s close, the major averages were all up more than 25% from their late-March lows.

Gilead shares jumped 9.7% after STAT news reported that a Chicago hospital treating coronavirus patients with remdesivir in a trial were recovering rapidly from severe symptoms. The publication cited a video it obtained where the trial results were discussed.

“An effective treatment is a huge deal and would create a path to open the economy and resume normal ‘social activities’ way sooner than a vaccine,” said Tom Lee, head of research at Fundstrat Global Advisors. “A treatment is safer and more scalable because it is only given to people who need to be treated.”

Other studies have shown remdesivir to be an effective treatment against the coronavirus. However, they have been smaller in scale. Gilead itself also cautioned that anecdotal reports are not enough to determine yet whether the drug will be an effective treatment.

Still, CNBC’s Jim Cramer said the drug could give the economy a “fighting chance.”

“Remdesivir sounds like something that can get people out of hospitals quickly,” Cramer said in a tweet Thursday. “That allows our economy to have a fighting chance..I think that remdesivir would cut the morbidity ... which would change how quickly we can open... and what we can do.”

Investors trimmed positions in work-from-home plays such as Amazon, Netflix and Walmart. Amazon dipped 1.4% while Netflix fell 3.7%. Walmart slid 0.2%. Still, Amazon and Netflix closed up more than 14% for the week while Walmart gained 8.5%.

Market comeback

Stocks tumbled from record highs in February into a bear market a month later as the spread of the coronavirus roiled market sentiment and the economic outlook. More than 2 million cases have been confirmed worldwide, including over 650,000 in the U.S., according to Johns Hopkins University. Governments urged people to stay home, effectively shutting down the global economy.

But the stock market has rallied since March 23 as new coronavirus cases in the U.S. and globally showed signs of plateauing. President Donald Trump said Thursday that “our experts say the curve has flattened and the peak … is behind us.”

He also issued guidelines to open up parts of the U.S. Thursday night, which identifies the circumstances necessary for areas of the country to allow employees to start returning to work. The decision to lift restrictions will ultimately be made by state governors.

The S&P 500 has jumped more than 30% from its March 23 intraday low while the Dow has gained 33.1% in that time.


To be sure, the outbreak has already dealt a massive blow to the economy. In four weeks, about 22 million Americans have lost their jobs. Retail sales posted last month their biggest fall on record.

Investors have said that news of an effective treatment or vaccine would be needed for stocks to mount a sustainable comeback.

“If it is effective in keeping someone from contracting the virus or, more likely, simply reduces its severity, that would be a game-changer and [would] allow the economy to restart both more quickly and more fully,” said Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at The Leuthold Group, about the Remdesivir trial report.
So, Wall Street got excited today based on a small but promising study out of Chicago looking at the effects Gilead's drug, Remdesivir.

I certainly hope we have new treatments but it's still early and the truth is, it will take a lot more than Remdesivir to alleviate fears. And that's if it proves to be an effective treatment.

The only thing that will really alleviate fears is a vaccine which is at least a year away, if not longer, and its efficacy remains to be seen.

Another problem is we are nowhere near the levels where herd immunity is reached (50% threshold):



This poses serious health risks for the population at large when they decide to reopen the US economy.

What about the stock market? It has been rallying since hitting a low on March 23, mostly owing to the Fed and large global pensions and sovereign wealth funds rebalancing their portfolio at the end of quarter.

But earnings are cratering as unemployment soars to unprecedented levels and some are sounding the alarm to be weary of this miraculous rally we are witnessing and that Fed can cure all problems:









The key for me right now is the Nasdaq which has been rallying like it's 1999:


I'm highly suspicious of this rally given that many small businesses have curbed or stopped their ads on Google and Facebook and many large corporations are putting off investments until they see more clarity.

In fact, this week Alphabet (Google) said it will slow hiring (aka, freeze it) and its investments:



Moreover,the Nasdaq-100 is slightly positive year-to-date despite 12-month forward earnings in freefall:



And concentration risk in this market is higher than ever before:


Something is going to give but people get all caught up in the most recent market rally and think it will last. It won't, it's a classic bear market rally, one of many to come.

It might last till the end of the month but my gut tells me the next drop will be more choppy and more severe, so prepare for a lot of volatility ahead:



The cheerleaders on CNBC are all out trying to calm their "high net worth" clients because they know the next six months will be hell.

As far as the overall US economy, the news is just horrific:







And I don't see a V-shaped recovery:



As I get ready to celebrate Orthodox Easter and the resurrection of Christ, I find myself worrying about the state of the world.

I honestly don't think we are going to get out of this mess quickly or as quickly as initially thought, and the longer this drags out, the worse it will be for the global economy and consumer sentiment.

I think people are overestimating the economic and stock market recovery and underestimating the long-term economic and psychological effects of this pandemic:



We will eventually emerge but to what? The new normal won't be fun and it will likely be with us for a very long time.

Below, Diane Swonk of Grant Thornton and Andrew Slimmon of Morgan Stanley Asset Management join"Squawk on the Street" to discuss the markets after weak economic data. I really like Diane Swonk, she's bang on.

Second, reports that Gilead's drug Remdesivir is reportedly showing effectiveness in treating coronavirus sent the stock higher ahead of Friday's open. Dr. Scott Gottlieb, member of the boards of Pfizer and biotech company Illumina and former FDA commissioner, joins"Squawk Box" to discuss.

Lastly, the Mayo Clinic is leading national coordination of plasma donation from recovered coronavirus patients for possible therapeutic treatment. Mayo Clinic CEO Gianrico Farrugia joins"Squawk Box" to discuss.

I'm far more hopeful on blood plasma donation than any other treatment but I warn you, anecdotal evidence isn't the same as a rigorous study which is done properly.

And these treatments will help alleviate fears but not displace them altogether and they won't save the economy from a major depression. Tread carefully and don't buy the hype.


Here Come The US Pension Bailouts?

$
0
0
Mary Williams Walsh of the New York Times reports that Illinois is seeking a bailout from Congress for its pensions and cities:
Illinois needs more than $40 billion in relief from the federal government because of the coronavirus pandemic — including $10 billion to help bail out its beleaguered pension system, according to a letter the Illinois Senate president sent to members of Congress.

The letter, sent this week by State Senator Don Harmon, also seeks a $15 billion grant to “stabilize the state’s budget,” $9.6 billion in direct aid to Illinois’s cities, $6 billion for the state’s unemployment insurance fund, and hardship money for hospitals and nursing homes, among other things.

“I realize I’ve asked for a lot, but this is an unprecedented situation,” Mr. Harmon, a Democrat, wrote in the letter to the state’s congressional delegation, a copy of which was viewed by The New York Times. A spokesman confirmed that Mr. Harmon had written the letter.

The letter was shared with Gov. J.B. Pritzker, also a Democrat, who said this week that the federal government should provide more funding to states. Messages left for State Senator Bill Brady, the minority leader, were not immediately returned on Friday evening. Democrats hold 40 of the State Senate's 59 seats.

The letter said the outbreak had caused economic havoc in the state, which has been under a stay-home order since March 21. Economic activity has frozen up across the country, causing tax collections to evaporate while spending has soared.

Last week, the National Governors Association said states needed “unrestricted fiscal support of at least $500 billion.”

The prospects of such a measure are uncertain. Democrats in Congress have pushed to include billions of dollars in aid for states and local governments in an interim package, pairing those funds and additional money for hospitals with the administration’s request for an emergency infusion of cash for a loan program to help distressed small businesses. Republicans have balked at the request, which has led to a lapse in funding for the loan effort, known as the Paycheck Protection Program, but Democrats argue that the request has merit, and discussions with the administration are expected to continue into the weekend.

Though Mr. Harmon pointed to the pandemic as the reason Illinois needed help, the problems with its pension system far predate the coronavirus. It is considered by experts to be one of the worst funded in the nation.

The system is actually a complex family of pension funds. Five are operated by the state, for teachers outside Chicago, legislators, judges and other state workers. Hundreds of other pension funds are operated by municipalities.

The state’s pensions are particularly generous, with 3 percent annual benefit increases that exceed those offered most other places. Many of them are deeply underfunded, and local governments have had to sharply raise taxes to pay what they owe.

In his letter, Mr. Harmon noted that the $9.6 billion in federal assistance to Illinois’s cities “will dramatically impact municipalities’ ability to fund retirement systems for the police, firefighters and other first responders providing emergency services during this Covid-19 outbreak.”

The pension obligations are big enough to crowd other spending out of the state’s budget. The three main ratings firms — Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s — rate Illinois’s credit at just one notch above junk territory, citing ballooning pension obligations as one reason.

Some states have been able to reduce their pension obligations after lengthy court fights, but it is all but impossible for Illinois to reduce what it owes: The State Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 2015 that no cuts would be possible.
Elizabeth Bauer of Forbes also reports on why Illinois's request for pension bailout is a non-starter:
On Friday, I cited the research group Wirepoints, who had obtained a copy of a letter sent by Illinois Senate President Don Harmon to the Illinois Congressional Delegation, requesting $41.6 billion plus, for various purposes including $10 billion for state pensions and $9.6 billion in aid to municipalities, for their pension funding.

Not surprisingly, this did not go over well.

The Chicago Tribune

in an editorial earlier today:

“Even by this state’s low standards, asking federal taxpayers from California to North Carolina, from North Dakota to Texas — farmers, small business owners, teachers, nurses, bus drivers, bartenders — to help dig Illinois out of its pre-coronavirus, self-inflicted, financial hellhole is astonishingly brazen. Every member of Congress should carefully scrutinize pleas from states whose unbalanced budgets, embarrassing credit ratings and vastly underfunded pension systems predated virus outbreak. . . .

“It’s absolutely true states and cities are suffering from dramatic revenue losses due to mandatory shutdowns in the retail sector, investment losses in pension funds and high demand for unemployment resources. But to suggest Illinois is worthy of such a generous bailout given its history is preposterous. . . .

“Ever heard the one about the man who kills his parents and then begs for mercy because he’s an orphan? That’s Springfield, destroying the state’s finances and then seeking a bailout.”

The Sun Times

was no less appalled:

“Last week, [Harmon] made a politically deaf, even foolish, pitch to Washington that can only hurt our state’s chances of securing additional COVID-19 relief funds. . . .

“Harmon has proposed that about a quarter of the new money for Illinois, $10 billion, be used to bail out our state government’s cash-strapped retirement systems — a problem not even remotely related to COVID-19.

“How Harmon thought to justify this “ask” — let alone put it in writing to be picked up in publications including the New York Times, Forbes and our own Sun-Times— is beyond us. . . .

At best, Harmon’s pension ask is politically clueless. At worst, it will serve to explode efforts at bipartisanship in Washington as our nation struggles to recover from the pandemic. You can almost see congressional Republicans waving Harmon’s letter in the air and saying: ‘See, we told you. Blue states like Illinois are just being greedy. They want us to bail them out of problems of their own making, created over decades. Why should we help them?’”

Illinois left-oriented politics site Capitol Fax wrote:

“For those who might say ‘It never hurts to ask,’ yes, it can hurt to ask . . . .

“Illinois created this problem. It’s Illinois’ responsibility to solve it, not the federal government’s. This letter could even hurt all other states’ attempts to convince Congress and the president to back an aid package.”

Fellow actuary and public pensions expert Mary Pat Campbell recounts the long history of pension underfunding and overpromising in Illinois, then writes:

“As for what’s due to Illinois for COVID problems, if you want to argue the need for a bailout, it seems reasonable to start with the extra costs [unemployment insurance, Medicaid claims, tech costs for schools, PPE for first responders, etc.] as a basis for bailout numbers. Maybe you can ask for making up for lost revenue…. but note, neither of these items tie to pensions per se. . . .

As the Wall Street Journal reports, many states are looking to reduce costs elsewhere, by nixing all sorts of things like teacher raises and property tax rebates. States mentioned: Virginia, New Jersey, Tennessee, Washington state.

“You think they will be happy with perennial profligate Illinois getting a huge chunk of change specifically because they’re been irresponsible?”

On Twitter, some experts didn’t reject the idea entirely outright; for instance, Andrew Biggs, also a Forbes contributor, suggested conditioning any funds on a move to defined contribution plans:



I’ll be honest: this suggestion seems like nothing more than wishful thinking. Trying to force pension reform after already conceding the prospect of federal funds is far too risky, as politicians would inevitably craft loopholes or trade away the reform provisions for other legislative priorities.

Trying to make sense of the request

Is this simply a matter of a tone-deaf legislator?

What’s the specific purpose of $10 billion?

Does any of this make any sense?

To the best of my knowledge, Harmon has not explained himself and Gov. JB Pritzker, again according to Capitol Fax, denies having directly asked for pension money.

Insolvency is (mostly) not the issue

Last week, Wirepoints reported that various Illinois municipal fire and police pensions were so poorly funded that they were at risk of insolvency, even before the pandemic hit— for instance, the Cairo Firefighters Pension Fund was 7% funded; the East St. Louis Firefighters Pension Fund, 9%; Danville Firefighters, 16%, and so on. The list of poorly-funded plans reads like a litany of economically-struggling cities, and, in particular, the police and firefighters in Illinois, unlike municipalities or teachers, each have individual pension plans by city/district, and up until 2011, there was no serious pressure to fund them properly. On the other hand, plans for municipal workers across the state are well-funded through the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund90% in 2018.

Regular readers will also recall that I assessed whether the plans for the city of Chicago — Police, Fire, Municipal Employees and Laborers — were at risk of insolvency, and, indeed, these plans, and in particular the Municipal Employees’ plan, are at risk of insolvency — if the city skips its scheduled contributions and never makes them up.

But the state of Illinois? Turns out, there’s a huge difference between 23% funded and 40% funded. I did the math for the largest fund, the TRS, or Teachers’ Retirement System, back in January. Even in a scenario in which assets immediately drop by one-third, then only earn 6%, rather than 7%, afterwards, and even if the state ceases contributing to the plan entirely, the plan would stay solvent until 2026.

Not, I’m not suggesting that the state should discontinue its contributions — but the point is simply that this is not an immediate crisis, which requires rapid funding in order for the state to cut its checks to retirees. This is, in that respect, wholly different from the requests for fund for unemployment or public health purposes, or, to revisit another topic I address regularly, the multi-employer pension crisis, in which plans such as Central States will inevitably become insolvent in 2025 even with their ongoing contributions, and take the multi-employer arm of the PBGC with it.

In fact, however poorly funded the state’s pensions are, this says nothing about Illinois’ basic ability cut cut these checks.

What’s the purpose of the money?

As it happens, Harmon’s $10 billion ask is nearly identical to the state’s statutory contribution to its pension funds in 2021, $9.7 billion. (The 2021 fiscal year runs from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021.) Is Harmon entertaining the possibility that the state will make its contributions only to the extent that the federal government funds this? Or did he somehow imagine that specifying pension funds as a use for bailout funds would garner support by assuring skeptics that it would be put to good use?

Or was Harmon hoping to boost the plans’ funded status over and above the usual contributions, to make up for asset losses?

The state has not reported on the impact of the market crash on its pension plans, but the consulting group Milliman reported the “largest single quarterly drop in the history of the Milliman Public Pension Funding Index”; from December-end to March-end, the estimated funded status for the 100 largest U.S. public pension plans dropped from 74.9% to 66.0%. Illinois, of course, was significantly less than this — 40% — even before this.

And, presciently, the Brookings Institute reported in late February that

“[public] plans are changing their asset allocations to chase higher investment returns. Two decades ago, about 90% of pension plan assets were invested in ordinary stocks and bonds. Today, that has fallen to just 60%. Instead, public-sector pension plans have ramped up their investments in private equity, real estate, commodities, and hedge funds. Ironically, the rise in actively managed, high-fee investments in the public sector is happening at the same time that private sector investors are pouring their own money into passively managed, low-cost mutual funds.

“The effects I’m describing are being felt today, in the midst of the longest and strongest bull market since World War II. If another recession hits, or even if we experience a period of middling investment returns, states would be forced into another round of cost-cutting that would harm teachers and make the teaching profession even less attractive to the next generation. Teachers may not be aware of those risks, but they’re real—and they’re growing.”

Does Harmon want to use the money to make up for asset losses? That’s no better an answer. Common sense should have dictated that, after years of high asset returns, a stock market correction would inevitably occur, even if no one could predict when. And funds which invest aggressively and riskily simply must accept that losses are a part of the picture. In that respect, Illinois’s pensions were never really 40% funded in the first place, if you consider an inevitable crash built into the asset values in the first place.

What next?

Has Harmon set back Illinois in its quest for federal funds? Congress will ultimately need to decide not merely how much money to allocate, but how to divvy up the funds, whether it’s proportionately based on population, or by assigning relatively levels of “need,” or whether funds are allocated based on the relative degree of political power of their Senators and Representatives.

Frankly, I find the idea that states whose budget holes now are the result of profligate spending in the past, should get “extra” money by the federal government to fill those holes, dismaying. It feels depressingly unfair to states which have been responsible with their finances. But there may be little choice in the matter, for fear of causing even more harm if those states can’t cut checks for workers expecting them.
I couldn't agree more, Illinois's pension train wreck started years before COVID-19 and it will continue years after unless they clean up their stinking pension sewer once and for all.

Using the crisis to ask for a pension bailout is quite disturbing to me. It's bad enough private equity funds which Illinois's state and city pensions invest in are asking and getting a bailout (with some good arguments behind this bailout), now this request by State Senator Don Harmon takes it to another level.

Illinois has mismanaged its public pensions for years and it's beyond outrageous, and quite disgusting actually, that they are using this pandemic as a justification to bail these pensions out.

The sad part of it is pension bailouts are coming. It might not be right away, but it's only a matter of time because many chronically underfunded US public pensions getting slammed hard from coronavirus are one step closer to insolvency.

And remember what I keep telling you, pension bailouts are all about bailing out Wall Street which includes big banks and their big private equity and hedge fund clients that need perpetual funding.

It has nothing to do with bailing out pensioners but politicians will make it look that way.

Again, it may not be right away, but mark my words, Congress will eventually bail out many chronically underfunded pensions and the Fed and Treasury will just monetize this debt.

The problem? Just like keeping zombie companies alive, they will keep zombie pensions alive to make sure the elite on Wall Street are able to keep tapping them in perpetuity for their next fund.

And then we wonder why after every major crisis, inequality keeps soaring to unprecedented levels.

George Carlin was right: "It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not part of the big club."

Below, Sean Carney, head of municipal strategy at BlackRock, and Bloomberg's Flynn McRoberts examined the new revenue plan for the state of Illinois as it faced mounting pension liabilities. They spoke on "Bloomberg Daybreak: Americas"over a year ago.

Also, in October 2019, at the Futures Industry Association conference in Chicago, Gov. Pritzker spoke on his taking office and working to pass a balanced budget. He shared his ideas on why Illinois' future can be better and attract more businesses, his approach to building a tech industry in Chicago and his thoughts on the ongoing corruption investigation that's involved a variety of public figures.

The discussion on pensions starts at minute 28 and he discusses some of the plans they implemented to address the ongoing crisis but doesn't address the lousy governance underlying all these pensions and why they should amalgamate all their public pensions at the state level.

Third, Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor at Allianz, joins"Squawk Box" to discuss why he believes the US economy could contract as much as 14% this year due to the coronavirus crisis.

Fourth, Sen. Marco Rubio has written a letter to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Small Business Administration Administrator Jovita Carranza on ways to replenish the stalled Paycheck Protection Program. He joins"Squawk Box" to discuss his ideas.

Fifth, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb joins"Squawk Box" to discuss steps businesses can take to reopen while also ensuring a safe work environment.

Lastly, Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared on Good Morning America this morning sharing the latest updates surrounding the country's plans for coronavirus as well as possibilities of a second wave. He warned against reopening the economy too soon and said many antibodies tests need to be validated.






CPPIB, OTPP and PSP Complete Big Deals

$
0
0
Ted Liu of Private Capital Journal reports CPPIB and OTPP complete 40% stake acquisition in IDEAL:
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) and Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (OTPP) have completed the tender offer period to purchase 40% of the shares of Impulsora del Desarrollo y el Empleo en América Latina, S.A.B. de C.V. (IDEAL) (BMV: IDEAL B-1).

The acquired shares will be transferred to CPPIB and OTPP on April 17 and the tender offer will formally settle on April 23.

CPPIB will own a 23.7% interest in IDEAL and OTPP will own a 16.3% stake. The current majority owners of IDEAL’s outstanding shares will continue to hold a majority shareholding in the company.

IDEAL is a sizable and important investment that provides exposure to existing and future infrastructure projects throughout Mexico. IDEAL’s portfolio includes 18 infrastructure concessions in Mexico (13 toll roads, three logistics terminals and two wastewater treatment plants), as well as an electronic toll collection service business and an operations business. IDEAL, Ontario Teachers’ and CPP Investments are already partners in the Arco Norte and Pacifico Sur toll roads.

As part of the arrangement, CPPIB and OTPP together with IDEAL will form an infrastructure investment trust known locally in Mexico as a FIBRA-E (Fideicomiso de Inversión en Energía e Infraestructura). The FIBRA-E structure was introduced in Mexico in 2015 to encourage private-sector investment in infrastructure projects.

The FIBRA-E will subsequently be funded by IDEAL, CPPIB and OTPP. FIBRA-E will be managed by a subsidiary of IDEAL and purchase partial stakes in four of IDEAL’s toll roads: Arco Norte, Chamapa – La Venta, Toluca Bypass and Tijuana – Tecate.

CPPIB and OTPP intend to reduce its stakes to minorities in the FIBRA-E following a secondary offering to other investors.
CPPIB put out a press release on the completion of this infrastructure partnership:
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (“CPP Investments”) and Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (“Ontario Teachers’”) today announced the completion of the tender offer period to purchase 40% of the shares of Impulsora del Desarrollo y el Empleo en América Latina, S.A.B. de C.V. (BMV:IDEAL B-1, “IDEAL”). This step concludes the shareholders’ acceptance of the offer of affiliates of Ontario Teachers’ and CPP Investments to purchase the shares of IDEAL.

In accordance with Mexican law, the acquired shares will be transferred to CPP Investments and Ontario Teachers’ on April 17 and the tender offer will formally settle on April 23.

The acquisition, which was first announced in November 2019, follows a tender offer in the Mexican stock exchange on March 18 for shares in IDEAL at MXN$43.96 per share. CPP Investments will own a 23.7% interest in IDEAL alongside a 16.3% stake owned by Ontario Teachers’. The current majority owners of IDEAL’s outstanding shares will continue to hold a majority shareholding in the company.

IDEAL is a sizable and important investment that provides exposure to existing and future infrastructure projects throughout Mexico. IDEAL’s portfolio includes 18 infrastructure concessions in Mexico (13 toll roads, three logistics terminals and two wastewater treatment plants), as well as an electronic toll collection service business and an operations business. IDEAL, Ontario Teachers’ and CPP Investments are already partners in the Arco Norte and Pacifico Sur toll roads.

As part of the arrangement, a subsidiary of IDEAL will form an infrastructure investment trust known locally in Mexico as a FIBRA-E (Fideicomiso de Inversión en Energía e Infraestructura). This FIBRA-E is subject to certain transaction steps and filings that are yet to be finalized. The FIBRA-E will subsequently be funded by IDEAL, CPP Investments and Ontario Teachers’, through certain affiliates. This is expected to occur before the end of April. The FIBRA-E structure was introduced in Mexico in 2015 to encourage private-sector investment in infrastructure projects.

As previously announced, the FIBRA-E will be managed by a subsidiary of IDEAL and purchase partial stakes in four of IDEAL’s toll roads: Arco Norte, Chamapa – La Venta, Toluca Bypass and Tijuana – Tecate. Following the completion of this funding, a secondary offering led by CPP Investments and Ontario Teachers’, through certain affiliates, will reduce their ownership to minority positions, while also introducing other investors.

About CPP Investments

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP Investments™) is a professional investment management organization that invests the funds not needed by the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) to pay current benefits in the best interests of 20 million contributors and beneficiaries. In order to build diversified portfolios of assets, investments in public equities, private equities, real estate, infrastructure and fixed income instruments are made by CPP Investments. Headquartered in Toronto, with offices in Hong Kong, London, Luxembourg, Mumbai, New York City, San Francisco, São Paulo and Sydney, CPP Investments is governed and managed independently of the Canada Pension Plan and at arm’s length from governments. At December 31, 2019, the CPP Fund totalled C$420.4 billion. For more information about CPP Investments, please visit www.cppinvestments.com or follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook or Twitter.

About IDEAL

IDEAL is an independent publicly traded company listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange (IDEALB1.MX). IDEAL engages in the development, promotion, operation and administration of infrastructure projects in Mexico and Latin America. IDEAL is one of the largest infrastructure companies in Latin America, with 18 infrastructure concessions in different sectors, including toll roads, water and logistics terminals.

About Ontario Teachers’

The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board (Ontario Teachers’) is the administrator of Canada’s largest single-profession pension plan, with $207.4 billion in net assets (all figures at December 31, 2019). It holds a diverse global portfolio of assets, approximately 80% of which is managed in-house, and has earned an annual total-fund net return of 9.7% since the plan’s founding in 1990. Ontario Teachers’ is an independent organization headquartered in Toronto. Its Asia-Pacific region office is located in Hong Kong and its Europe, Middle East & Africa region office is in London. The defined-benefit plan, which is fully funded, invests and administers the pensions of the province of Ontario’s 329,000 active and retired teachers. For more information, visit otpp.com and follow us on Twitter @OtppInfo.
I've already covered this deal in November 2019 here. No need repeating myself except to say if you're going to invest big in Mexico, it's best to have Carlos Slim's conglomerate as a trusted partner.

This morning, Mexico’s central bank delivered a second emergency interest rate cut and promised measures to boost liquidity amid a looming recession caused by the coronavirus outbreak and a plunge in oil prices:
Banco de Mexico reduced the benchmark rate by 50 basis points to a three-year low of 6% at an unscheduled meeting on Tuesday. Officials had already surprised markets with a half-percentage point cut on March 20.

The decision to repeat an unscheduled rate reduction by one of the world’s most hawkish central banks reflects the uncertainty surrounding the Mexican economy. Economists forecast gross domestic product will contract 5% this year, with some top banks predicting a fall of as much as 9%.


“Considering the risks resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic for inflation, economic activity and financial markets, major challenges arise for monetary policy and for the economy in general,” the statement read. “The negative effects on domestic economic activity resulting from the pandemic may lead to an important contraction of economic activity.”
You might be wondering why CPPIB and OTPP went through on this deal given the current circumstances. COVID-19 is ravaging Mexico's hospitals, the country just marked its deadliest day amid coronavirus lockdown and the rout in oil is impacting its economy.

But this deal was signed back in November and both OTPP and CPPIB see it as a long-term infrastructure play in an economy which will grow rapidly over the next decade (after this pandemic subsides).

There's no doubt, however, that Carlos Slim is reaping the big gains in the short run:


But Slim will still retain a majority stake in this entity, aligning his long-term interests with those of CPPIB and OTPP.

In another recent deal, Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP Investments) and the Alberta Teachers’ Retirement Fund Board (ATRF) completed the acquisition of AltaGas Canada Inc. (ACI) (TSX: ACI) at $33.50 per share for total consideration of $1.005 billion.

PSP put out a press release on this deal:
Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta; Montréal, Québec (March 31, 2020) – AltaGas Canada Inc. (“ACI”) (TSX: ACI), the Public Sector Pension Investment Board (“PSP Investments”) and the Alberta Teachers’ Retirement Fund Board (“ATRF”) are pleased to announce the completion today of the acquisition of all of the 30,000,000 common shares of ACI (“Common Shares”) by PSPIB Cycle Investments Inc. (the “Purchaser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TriSummit Cycle Holding Inc. (“Holdco”), in an all-cash transaction pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the “Arrangement”) under Section 192 of the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”). The Purchaser acquired each Common Share for $33.50, for total consideration of $1.005 billion.

Mr. Jared Green, ACI's President and Chief Executive Officer, commented:

“We are excited to have this transaction close and to have the support of both PSP Investments and ATRF as we move forward with the execution of our strategy. We have numerous growth opportunities in front of us and a solid financial footing to be able to deliver on them.”

With the Arrangement now complete, the Common Shares will be delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange in the coming days.

Corporate Name Change

In connection with the completion of the Arrangement, ACI’s name will be changed to TriSummit Utilities Inc.

TriSummit Utilities Inc. will remain incorporated under the CBCA, with its headquarters located in Calgary, Alberta. While TriSummit Utilities Inc. will not have its securities listed on any stock exchange, it will continue to be a reporting issuer under applicable Canadian securities laws because its public debt remains outstanding.

“Changing our name to TriSummit Utilities Inc. is a reflection of the next step for our organization while providing acknowledgment to our three utilities which are the foundation of our company,” added Mr. Green. “Most importantly, we will continue to deliver the same safe, reliable and affordable service to our customers while continuing the strong relationships we have built with our regulators.”

Board of Directors

David W. Cornhill, Gregory A. Aarssen, Judith Athaide, Amit Chakma, William J. Demcoe and Jared Green will continue as Directors of ACI following completion of the Arrangement and Mr. Cornhill will remain as Chair of the Board. All of ACI’s officers will continue in their positions.

Mr. David Cornhill, ACI’s Chair of the Board, commented:

“On behalf of the Board, I would like to extend my sincere thanks and best wishes to Corine Bushfield, who has resigned from ACI’s Board of Directors. I am pleased to see good continuity with the Board of Directors and Management and welcome the new Directors. Finally, I would like to congratulate the team at ACI, PSP Investments and ATRF on the completion of the Arrangement, which I believe is a positive outcome for all stakeholders.”

In connection with the completion of the Arrangement, ACI also announces the following four new Directors: Dietz Kellmann, Samuel Langleben, Patrick Chabot and Jason Munsch.

Dietz Kellmann is the President and Chief Operating Officer of Global Remediation Technology, and President of DCLK Consulting Corp. Dietz also serves as a Director of Doyon Utilities, LLC. He holds a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in Economics from the University of Western Ontario, a Master of Arts in Economics from the University of Western Ontario, and a Master of Business Administration from Simon Fraser University. He is a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors.

Sam Langleben is a Director, Infrastructure Investments, at PSP Investments. He holds a Masters in International Energy Policy Management from Columbia University’s School of International & Public Affairs, and a Bachelor of Commerce from McGill University.

Patrick Chabot is a Director, Infrastructure Investments, at PSP Investments. He is a CFA Charterholder and holds a Master of Science in Finance and a Bachelor of Business Administration from Laval University.

Jason Munsch is Head of Infrastructure at ATRF. He is a CFA Charterholder, holds an ICD.D designation, a Master of Business Administration from the University of Calgary and a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Alberta.

Details regarding the Arrangement are set out in ACI’s management information circular and proxy statement dated November 19, 2019, a copy of which can be found under ACI’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

The purpose of the Arrangement was to enable the Purchaser to acquire 100% of the Common Shares. Immediately prior to the completion of the Arrangement, neither the Purchaser nor Holdco directly or indirectly owned any securities of ACI.
I looked at TriSummit Utilities and it's a solid company providing clean energy to its clients.

Its vision is to be the clean energy supplier of choice in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates through being a leader in safety, reliability, cost effectiveness and customer service.

Moreover, the company’s strategy is focused on delivering safe, reliable, clean and cost-effective energy solutions to customers while achieving long-term profitable growth.

Now, given the rout in oil, people will wonder why didn't PSP and ATRF wait till now to strike this deal?

Again, this deal was signed back in October of last year, it's just being completed and nobody could have predicted a pandemic would strike and oil would fall off a cliff.

These deals cannot be viewed over a year, they need to be viewed over a decade.

It's also important to note that PSP's infrastructure team doesn't just invest in renewable energy but across a gamut of assets including toll roads, airports, ports (transportation assets have been hit) and digital (which have not hit and are booming from this).

Apparently, PSP did sell its stake in Athens airport back in October and that was a good (albeit fortuitous) move given they likely got a nice price for their stake right before this pandemic hit (if this sale went happened, not sure).

PSP also announced some smaller deals recently. It made a strategic investment in SitusAMC, a leading provider of services and technology supporting the real estate finance industry.
SitusAMC, the leading provider of services and technology supporting the real estate finance industry, today announced that The Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP Investments) has made a strategic investment in the firm. PSP Investments joins Stone Point Capital, who remains the largest shareholder in SitusAMC. Additional shares are held by SitusAMC’s management team.

“We are thrilled to partner with PSP Investments as we look to transform the real estate finance industry,” said Michael Franco, CEO of SitusAMC. “Having long-term capital partners such as PSP Investments and Stone Point Capital will be a driving force for our company through market cycles as we continue to help our clients identify and capture opportunities across the entire lifecycle of their commercial and residential real estate activity.”

“SitusAMC has a bold vision for their industry, supported by a proven leadership team, a strong operational foundation, and world-class services and technology offerings. We look forward to supporting the team, alongside Stone Point, in its next phase of growth,” said Martin Longchamps, Managing Director, Private Equity, PSP Investments.

Chuck Davis, CEO of Stone Point Capital, added, “We are pleased to be partnering with PSP Investments and look forward to working alongside them to support the long-term growth and development of SitusAMC.”

About SitusAMC

SitusAMC (www.situsamc.com) is the leading independent provider of advisory, strategic outsourcing, talent and technology solutions to the commercial and residential real estate finance industry. The firm helps clients realize opportunities in their real estate businesses through industry-leading services and innovative technologies that drive operational efficiency, increase business effectiveness, and improve market agility across the entire lifecycle of their global real estate activity.
And more recently, PSP financed a $100 million deal to Reflexion for cancer treatment commercialization:
RefleXion Medical, a therapeutic oncology company pioneering the use of biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) for all stages of cancer, today announced the close of a $100 million equity financing led by Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP Investments), one of Canada’s largest pension investment managers that focuses on long-term investments with partners demonstrating strong value orientation strategies.

“RefleXion’s bold vision for the future of cancer care stands to completely reshape how physicians think about treating patients with stage 4 cancer,” said Loïc Julé, managing director, Global Investment Partnerships Portfolio, PSP Investments.“This is exactly the mindset of companies we strive to build long-term relationships with. We are thrilled to support RefleXion during this next phase of their growth as they ramp up market and clinical adoption of this groundbreaking technology.”

RefleXion’s existing investors, TPG’s The Rise Fund, KCK Group, Sofinnova Partners, Venrock, T. Rowe Price, and global pharmaceutical leaders, Pfizer Ventures and Johnson & Johnson Innovation, JJDC Inc., all participated in the round. BofA Securities and Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC acted as placement agents for the company.

“This new influx of capital continues our momentum initiated first by FDA clearance of the RefleXion™ X1 platform last month, then quickly followed by the close of our first system order at one of the world’s leading cancer centers,” said Todd Powell, president and CEO of RefleXion. “The support of this top-tier investment syndicate enables us to further scale operations around commercializing the X1 platform.

“Moreover, these funds allow us to validate the practical implications of using BgRT on a daily basis as we transform radiotherapy from early-stage cancer treatment to an option for patients with all stages of cancer,” continued Powell.

The RefleXion X1 machine with BgRT is designed to overcome the technical limitations that currently restrict radiotherapy to one or two tumors. When available, RefleXion will scale BgRT to treat all visible tumors, even those that move rapidly due to bodily functions such as breathing or digestion, in the same treatment session.
RefleXion recently announced FDA clearance for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and its first clinical and commercial client.

About RefleXion Medical

RefleXion is a privately-held company developing the first biology-guided radiotherapy system, a significant change in strategy from single tumor therapy to the ability to one day treat multiple tumors in the same treatment session in cancers that have metastasized. Currently, the RefleXion X1 machine is cleared for the delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The company is also developing BgRT, which incorporates positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging data to enable tumors to continuously signal their location. The BgRT technology will synchronize these data with the linear accelerator to direct radiotherapy to tumors with subsecond latency.
Exciting stuff and if this technology proves successul in trials, it will revolutionize late-stage cancer treatment, and PSP will be part of it.

Lastly, the horrific crime in Nova Scotia has left every Canadian sad and distraught.

Among the 18 innocent victims was Heidi Stevenson, a 23-year veteran of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police:


A GoFundMe account was launched in support of Const. Heidi Stevenson’s husband, and their two adolescent children. The online fundraiser set out to raise $10,000. Within a day, more than $58,000 in donations poured in (the organizer has currently disabled new donations to this fundraiser).

Messages of condolence for the family can be sent to RCMP.Condolences-Condoleances.GRC@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

I join PSP in thanking law enforcement members and first responders who stepped in to ensure the community's safety and along with millions of Canadians, want to also express my deepest sympathies to all the families for this traggic loss of innocent lives.



We live in a crazy world and let's hope we never see such a horrific killing spree ever again.

Below, the New York Times reports as much of the world shuts down amid the worsening coronavirus pandemic, Mexico City’s streets are bustling and the country’s president insists on calm. “This is going to be as bad as Italy or worse,” says once concerned doctor. Let's hope he's wrong.

Also, Global News reports a rural Nova Scotia community is coming to terms with the tragic shooting that happened over the weekend. We are learning more about the 18 innocent lives that were lost in this senseless tragedy.

The RCMP just released new details of a mass shooting in Nova Scotia. RCMP say they now believe 22 victims died, in addition to the gunman.



Viewing all 2816 articles
Browse latest View live